MooooShroooom

@CabbotEllie It seems clear to me that she is in the WH as gov of her state to put her foot down & let him know how he is hurting the people in her state with tariffs. She said she wanted more manufacturing in her state. I don't know what she said that was wrong?

I fear some of you did not actually listen to what Gretchen Whitmer said and it’s ok for you to just admit that 🙂

@JayHHunter @jakebarber2025 Thank you Jay, for offering your help.

@jakebarber2025 Here's my imdb page so you can see my credits. imdb.com/name/nm0402870/

Vintage Camera Experts 🎥 We appreciate all the camera operator experts and enthusiast that have been reaching out. Ideally, we would love a robust army of imagers helping us gather as much imagery as possible - from different angles, distances, and altitudes with a variety of equipment. Two of the primary challenges for our camera operators right now are digital interference and the extreme speed and movement of the objects. For the former, there seems to be something about the phenomenon that interferes with digital camera technology. Because of this we are looking to also add a vintage camera suite. There’s lots of evidence that suggests analog imagery of the phenomenon produces better results in some circumstances. In regards to the speed and movement challenge, please see the below video clip from episode two. This is what we are dealing with. Note the speed and movement of the Tic Tacs at 100% vs. 15% . If you feel you’re up to the challenge and have something of value to add, please continue to reach out and offer solutions. 🙏🇺🇸

Taken case by case, the interesting bits of a UFO sighting are explained away. Boring stops there. The curious place all the data together and compare. Finding commonalities among small details that are not widely reported to the public. XPs hold back details so we can be sure.

What I have seen communicated is the opinion that witness testimony is weighted all the same. Not reliable. But in reality, things like eyewitnesses can be weighted. In reality, a large amount of anecdotal evidence - while being anecdotal - is evidence. Taken case by case /3

"When you've been on the water more in your life than you haven't been, you know the difference." -witness aboard the USS Jackson Hearing this last night on Weaponized, I was reminded of a point that skeptics like to make that is not necessarily true. Link in the reply.

@UAPUFO_Inv @KCegj4491 @MickWest @MvonRen @GarryPNolan @SkywatcherHQ "The Tedesco brothers waited for their peer review and do you know what has happened? NOTHING." There are many reasons the brothers have failed to have impact. Skywatch has approached this with sober planning for maximum impact. The UFO Twitterati is NOT their target market.

Ummm NO. @GarryPNolan is bound by various non-disclosure/security clearances from the Federal Government. So are certain members of @skywatcherHQ. All that needs to happen is a government official stepping in and making the whole thing one big classified secret. The information needs to be released immediately before this happens. Screw waiting for the peer review, the academics can look at the data after its released in total. The Tedesco brothers waited for their peer review and do you know what has happened? NOTHING. Since 2015 a few scientists have been looking at the Tridactyl Beings in Nazca Peru. Scientists outside of Peru have mostly ignored it. Why? because they are afraid of what their peers might say if they look into it. If you are not familiar with it please read this for starters; #okCuv7NukDBp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">drive.proton.me/urls/KGE4ZEF5P… Then you can go to Tridactyls.org for more. We need catastrophic disclosure of some type because the government isn't willing to release anything and everyone else is either looking for the cash cow or afraid of some type of repercussion.

Location data for Skywatcher can be found in the video itself. Just geolocate the mountains, and there it is. What exactly is so "sensitive" about this location data?

@KCegj4491 @UAPUFO_Inv @MickWest @MvonRen @GarryPNolan @SkywatcherHQ People who came out quickly after last night's show and started sharing their negative reviews have one thing in common. I was listening to a podcast last night and the host was livid after watching Part 2. Turned out he missed a lot of the details because of his negative bias.

@UAPUFO_Inv @MickWest @MvonRen @GarryPNolan @SkywatcherHQ It would be a mess your way, the debunkers would have a field day and dominate. They love that. And AARO's been to the "range" so there's implicit Gov curiosity.

@UAPUFO_Inv @MickWest @MvonRen "If one thousand people showed up to the location is that going to prevent them from doing their thing?" Yes. People who are able to expand their awareness and communicate with other beings would have you know that belief, intention & excited anticipation is a necessary mindset.

@MvonRen this time, for the first time, I am with @mickwest on this one. There is absolutely no reason they cannot release the data and stop the cloak and dagger secrecy. Sound scientific analysis does not rely on secrecy or hidden locations. If one thousand people showed up to the location is that going to prevent them from doing their thing? I think it is they just don't want to be bothered with people showing up watching their equipment and methodology. Please do not get me wrong here. I want them to succeed however I personally have had enough of the "its secret I can't talk about it" routine. It reminds me of the old man on a cart that dangles a carrot in front of the horse to get him to move. I have a open letter of sorts asking serious questions of their methodology and equipment being used. It has yet to be answered. In the video you are in, the representative states their servos cannot keep up with the UAP/UFO in order to keep it in the frame. If they would open up to the interested public and pose the problems they are experiencing, people may just have an answer to fix the challenges they are experiencing. I will copy you on my open letter and see if you have any thoughts about it.

@MickWest IDK. Maybe you don't need a bunch of looky loos on the site when you are doing research like this.. I'm pretty sure they have a secured area to protect their space from trespass.

@SKEPTICLBELIEVR @ChrisKMellon We will never know unless someone asks and someone answers.

Congrats to this law enforcement officer and Airman Jeff Nuccetelli for keeping records and speaking out; to Ryan Graves for assisting him; and to George and Jeremy for an excellent interview. When you research UAP and encounter scores of well-documented individuals and cases like this—cases involving credible and reliable military personnel working at our most sensitive military facilities—your perspective inevitably changes. The cumulative effect, frequently combined with radar or photographic data, is impossible to ignore. Astronomer Dr. Peter Sturrock of Stanford demonstrated that an overwhelming majority of astronomers—who are mostly skeptics—become supporters of UAP scientific research after just 50 hours of exposure to UAP data. Most normal people—not to mention brilliant scientists—will follow the path of learning and come to realize the UAP topic is legitimate if they take the time to dig into the subject by reading serious books or investigating the issue online. The DoD has gathered over 1,800 official UAP reports in just the last few years, and most cases likely go unreported. There have been hundreds of thousands of UAP reports since WWII. It is not easy to awaken the public, especially when the mainstream media refuse to publish cases like this—but more people are coming forward; more scientific research data the government can’t control is being acquired; Congress and AARO are investigating; and all manner of surveillance technology is improving. The truth—whatever it proves to be—will inevitably emerge. It is only a matter of time. weaponizedpodcast.com/episodes-3/epi…

@TravelingOnX @ShadowofEzra It also sounds like you have believed everything a skeptic told you. I bet you are a James Randi fan lol

Come on people. This is a psyop. Where is your critical thinking? Just ask some questions! 1. Consider the source. It's coming from the CIA - confirmed liars. That is literally one of their jobs. 2. I have no problem with "woo" but, Given that Project Sun Streak relied on remote viewing—a practice widely criticized as pseudoscience—how much weight can we reasonably give to a psychic’s description of an object they never physically observed? 3. Vague: The psychic described a “coffin-shaped object made of wood, gold, and silver” with a “six-winged angel.” How does this conclusively point to the Ark of the Covenant rather than any other ornate artifact or reliquary from history? 4. Inconsistant info: The Ark of the Covenant is traditionally described in the Bible as a gold-covered wooden chest with two cherubim (angels) on top, not six wings on a single angel. How do you reconcile this discrepancy with the psychic’s account? 5. Location: The statement suggests the object was “possibly” buried in Ethiopia or elsewhere in the Middle East. Why is the location so imprecise, and what specific evidence ties it to Ethiopia beyond speculation? 6. Guards?: What are these mysterious “entities capable of destroying intruders”? Are they supposed to be supernatural, technological, or human guards? How does the document explain their presence and capabilities? 7. Ok, where is it then?: If the CIA supposedly located the Ark in 1988, why has no physical proof—like photographs, samples, or detailed expedition records—surfaced to support this claim? 8. Motive: Why would the CIA invest in finding a biblical artifact using psychics, and if they succeeded, what incentive would they have to keep it secret rather than leverage it for political, religious, or cultural influence? 9. Follow the narrative: Is this "information repeated across multiple mainstream networks? Look into it. You'll see. 10. Emotional Triggers: Classic, people want to believe this. It helps them get rid of some of their fear of death. Think about it. This is so easy for me. It seems most people have lost the ability to question anything. People often just believe whatever they have heard and take it as face value. That's a complete fail - especially in this great world of lies. In conclusion, the CIA’s alleged psychic hunt for the Ark of the Covenant unravels as a probable psyop, undermined by a dubious source, pseudoscience, vague and inconsistent details, and no evidence. Amplified by mainstream narratives, it exploits emotional hopes rather than reason. In a deceptive age, unquestioned acceptance signals a critical thinking crisis, demanding sharper skepticism.

@TravelingOnX @ShadowofEzra So many words for someone who has never really investigated or tried remote viewing.

@theericjacobus @ShadowofEzra dumbass. No people that age are getting checks. If you knew how computers worked you would understand why they were listed that way.

@ShadowofEzra Wonder how many "remote viewers" talked to those dead social security recipients and convinced the government to put them back on the dole.

@DoreenVirtue @ShadowofEzra Get tired of grifting new agers now onto Xtianity!

If God allows the Ark of the Covenant to be discovered, He wouldn’t have the discovery happen through the condemned practice of remote viewing by a psychic, as this article describes. Before my salvation, I taught and practiced remote viewing and it is 100% controlled by demons trying to deceive and confuse.

If you repost this garbage then your a moron who is spreading lies.

@3d4yourlife @_SolFoundation Do you know what they even do? Where all that money goes? I have found until you walk in someone's shoes, you have NO idea about what the day to day reality of that person.

@3d4yourlife @_SolFoundation You can listen to what they say for free in your underwear if you like! In person pricing is for people who are, knowingly, donating to a just cause. I don't think grannies are using their last social security checks to buy seats there. What do they spend it all on? Aha! /1

Last call: The Sol Forum's first meeting will take place TODAY at 12:30 pm PDT/3:30 pm EDT (and 20:30 CET in Europe) and will feature Jacques Vallée, Hal Puthoff, and Larry Lemke in conversation about the science of UAP and their participation in the Invisible College. To access the meeting, use this link: youtube.com/live/wRkz4jqwI…