Nathan Harris

10.4K posts

Nathan Harris banner
Nathan Harris

Nathan Harris

@Mordil

Probably wrote software you rely on | Younger than I look, but older than I am

Austin, TX Katılım Haziran 2010
106 Takip Edilen501 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Nathan Harris
Nathan Harris@Mordil·
@gunpolicy @RedWolfMenace @JT_TarranKemp “To be able to raise a well-armed militia, which is necessary for the defense of the State, the rights to keep and bear arms by the People shall not be infringed” is the more modern way of writing the 2A
English
7
3
70
0
Nathan Harris
Nathan Harris@Mordil·
Failing the test with those questions does not imply a specific answer either way. I could say “yes” to the questions, and fail because I did neither of those things. However, that, plus the exposé on the subject, COULD raise reasonable doubt to the case as a juror. It’s not a slam dunk
Viva Frei@thevivafrei

I don’t often use the word “BOMBSHELL”. But this right here is a BOMBSHELL, and I don’t think people yet appreciate the significance of it. The government produced discovery to Brian Cole Jr.’s defense attorneys. Brian Cole Jr. is the accused planter of the Jan. 6 pipe bombs, whom many people believe to be a total patsy. I am one of those people who believes he is a total patsy. The government just provided discovery to Cole’s defense team, which alleges that on November 6, 2025, Kerkhoff was subjected to a polygraph AND FAILED. She was allegedly asked two questions: “did you place those pipe bombs?” and “did you place those pipe bombs that evening?” She allegedly FAILED that polygraph, according to this filing from the defense. The date is critical, because the polygraph apparently occurred TWO DAYS before Steve Baker’s exposé was PUBLISHED. I emphasize the word “published” because the article was almost certainly known / circulated internally presumably because it was circulated for review and comment, legal, etc. Operating on the basis that the facts alleged in this motion are accurate (I would imagine the defense attorneys are not going to lie about Kerkhoff having failed a polygraph), it is stunning that the government would have willingly and knowingly communicated this prima facie exculpatory evidence to the defense, unless they had a good reason. Some of you are going to say “Brady obligations”, etc. To which I would respond that this would not be the first time the government has “lost”, “accidentally” deleted, or outright concealed / destroyed what would otherwise be exculpatory Brady disclosures. Heck, they did it to many of the Jan. 6ers in the first place. And many of the agents who violated the defense rights of countless Jan. 6ers still have their jobs. One of two alternatives is likely true: The government *did not know* they had that information when they turned over presumably hundreds of thousands of pages of discovery and terabytes of information to the defense. They didn’t know. They sent it off. They just stepped into it, and it’s going to come back and destroy their case. Or, they DID KNOW what they were communicating it to the defense, that it would destroy their case, AND THEY DID IT ANYWAY. Call it an act of sabotage, from corrupt agents within a DOJ that has not yet purged itself of corrupt “deep state” actors. To the extent that it destroys the case against Brian Cole Jr., who does it humiliate the most, and who does it benefit the most? It will humiliate the DOJ - or at least those in charge. Who will it benefit the most? Everyone who would otherwise want to sabotage the DOJ and the Trump administration, on the eve of midterms. When this case blows up, it will be exploited and weaponized to discredit the Trump DOJ. I have been saying for a while that under Bondi’s DOJ, there have been some debacles so egregious, they could only be the result of incompetence or sabotage. The government either did not know what they were handing over to Brian Cole Jr.’s defense team, or they did, and it was intended to be sabotage. Unless the allegations in the motion are incorrect, or there is another good explanation for what is alleged therein. This is a bona fide bombshell.

English
0
0
0
16
Nathan Harris
Nathan Harris@Mordil·
AI for QA COULD be used to automate the most grueling part of QA testing games: licking walls or verifying hyper-specific bugs don’t reproduce. Ideally, it’d leave them to be able to focus on the core parts: is it fun, is it balanced, playing like an actual human would
Grummz@Grummz

Interview reveals Arc Raiders used AI much more extensively than anyone realized. It was a “Trojan horse” test that drove costs way down while allowing them to ship faster. "What needs to be done by hand versus what a machine can do more efficiently?”

English
0
0
0
19
Nathan Harris retweetledi
Spaceballs The X Account
Now that Artemis II has launched we have 10 days to get everyone on Earth a Planet of the Apes costume so we can do something hilarious when the astronauts return 😁
Spaceballs The X Account tweet media
English
2.1K
16.6K
87.1K
2.1M
Nathan Harris retweetledi
Frank J. Fleming
Can I own the space of believing in the Apollo missions but claiming this new one is faked? I assume that position is less crowded.
English
37
27
1.8K
38.2K
Nathan Harris retweetledi
S.🎧
S.🎧@1ssve·
Apple: Touch ID makes signing into your MacBook a breeze My MacBook literally every day: Your password is required to use Touch ID :)
English
66
269
11.8K
426.5K
Nathan Harris retweetledi
Pat Stedman | Dating & Relationship Coach for Men
Boomer conservatives tended to raise their daughters like sons. Often even more so. It's one of the major reasons in spite of a lot of surface "rightwing" political views they haven't conserved anything. Their behaviors were ultimately extremely progressive. And confession time: to be candid I'm not sure even I'm entirely immune to it either. I intend to encourage my daughters to be free thinkers and entrepreneurial. I don't want them to be helpless and totally dependent on a man. I want to develop their gifts and their dreams. But I also want them to understand that a husband, children, and family should be priorities and are what would make me most proud. I will be blunt and realistic with them both about what men want, and about the perils of spending their 20s romantically fucking around. They should date intentionally from the start. In other words I don't want them to he some independent "boss babe" but I DO want them to be an asset for a top quality man across the board. And to me that means encouraging confidence in their capabilities as well as their femininity wiles. This feels like the proper balance but honestly I don't know. Seems like we're starting from scratch and just trying to adapt to the world.
Here to Watch It Burn@WindowToTheAbys

@juansondeluxe @revenant_MMXX My wife was raised in the church and a good girl. Her parents were on paper conservatives. We didnt have children until our mid 30s, because she dragged her feet and her "conservative" parents encouraged her to. "You have time!" Waiting for a career to take off that went nowhere.

English
40
19
386
38.6K
Ron Snyder
Ron Snyder@RonSnyder9681·
@wretchedmarine If the ads were only visual, I would not care. The audio defaults to a noise level of 11 and is maddening.
English
1
0
11
85
chris™
chris™@wretchedmarine·
To whomever decided to put ads on gas pumps… You suck.
English
46
12
695
13.4K
🇯🇵砂川 泉🎌
🇯🇵砂川 泉🎌@26ers_bp115·
アメリカ人はこれを文化の盗用だと思うのだろうか? 彼らは古き良き時代のアメリカに生まれた音楽とダンスを愛してるだけだよ。
日本語
4.7K
940
21.9K
459.4K
Nathan Harris
Nathan Harris@Mordil·
@TheOtherBill2 @ShamashAran @26ers_bp115 The only true cultural appropriation is trying to claim the culture is actually yours. It’s like if Whites tried to claim Jazz was originally from us. Or if Gumbo is actually a traditional midwestern dish. Everything else is appreciation. “Hey this is awesome, can I join in?”
English
1
0
2
34
Nathan Harris
Nathan Harris@Mordil·
@Paytreearckey1 @TRHLofficial No. Leave it to the states to decide, like Arizona. Congress can mandate that the States MUST pick one or the other and stick with it - but not a one-size-fits-all decision
English
1
0
4
66
The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarian@TRHLofficial·
Changes I would make during an Article V Convention of States: 1. Cap the Supreme Court at 9. 2. Only Citizens can vote. States can refine further. 3. Term limits 4. Repeal the 16th 5. Repeal the 17th 6. Repeal the 19th (mutes post) 7. Ban congressional stock trading 8. Ban lobbying/pacs 9. Ban foreign money 10. Write the second amendment so that a 2 year old may understand it 11. Ban dual citizens from holding office. 12. No reelection for Congressmen without a balanced budget 13. Abolish the Patriot Act 14. Fire all Bureaucrats 15. President Washington’s cabinet was 5 people: Treasury, State, War, VP, and AG. Cap it there. Abolish everything else 16. No foreign aid while we are in debt 17. Return to the gold standard and subsidize it with other precious metals. 18. National Ron Paul Day of Celebration 19. Single issue bills only. 20. all congressmen who vote in favor of war must send their first born son 21. Abolish the tax code. 21. No pay for Congress during a shutdown. 22. Cut spending by 7% a year 23. Make the Declaration of Independence the Law of the Land. 24. Abolish birthright citizenship 25. Reinstate the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act’s domestic dissemination ban on propaganda. 26. Fix the food— the soil, the GMOs, the dyes, the chemicals. Make food food again 27. Ban communism. 28. Ban transing kids 29. Death penalty for pedophiles 30. Reinstate duels This is just a start. I reserve the right to add to this list.
English
2.1K
3K
17.3K
409.1K
Nathan Harris retweetledi
Vasiliy Zukanov
Vasiliy Zukanov@VasiliyZukanov·
I still can't get over this irony: For decades, we said documentation is critical for software projects, but most orgs barely cared. Then LLMs arrived. Now everyone is rushing to document everything: AGENTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, SKILLS.md, WHAT_I_LIKE_FOR_LUNCH.md, etc. We finally do for AI what we never bothered to do for humans 😳
Vasiliy Zukanov@VasiliyZukanov

AI skills remind me of that revolutionary idea from the past...

English
41
23
237
24.3K