Morveer

La perfección no está a mi alcance. Y me parece perfecto.

‼️ This is treason in plain sight. The Hungarian foreign minister has betrayed his country, the EU, and its partners, as well as the values on which the EU is built. In any democratic country, he would already be in prison! Crazy…

Victor Orbán’s minister offered Sergey Lavrov to send him EU documents through the Hungarian embassy in Moscow. It’s really beyond shocking.

Hace unos días colgué la historia de los 30€ que me estafaron en Wallapop hace 4 años. Resumen: Denuncia, juicio (al que no se presentó, claro), sentencia condenándole por estafa y cuatro años después: ha pagado 480€ de responsabilidad penal con días de arresto domiciliario y mis 30€ se ha declarado insolvente. Pues ayer llamé al juzgado a ver si se podía hacer algo. La señora que me atendió fue maja, pero esto me dijo: “Mire, como es insolvente, la responsabilidad civil queda ahí pendiente… pero no tiene nada que embargar. Ni sueldo, ni coche, ni piso a su nombre. Puede usted seguir ejecutando la sentencia, pero le va a costar más en tasas y abogados de lo que va a recuperar.” Vamos, que para intentar cobrar 30€ me tengo que gastar otros 200 o 300 pavos en un procedimiento que casi seguro no lleva a nada. Esto me ha dejado pensando. No es solo mi caso. Hay gente que pierde 500, 1.000 o 3.000 euros y acaba exactamente igual: con una sentencia a su favor que no vale para nada. El estafador sigue tan campante, y tú, que fuiste el pringado, te quedas con la sensación de que el sistema está montado al revés. Me genera bastante impotencia, la verdad. Da la sensación de que denunciar sirve para que “se haga justicia” en el papel, pero en la vida real la víctima sigue siendo la que paga el pato.

Bloomberg just dropped the Orbán tapes and it reads like a bad fanfic. Hungary’s prime minister spent a phone call with Putin calling him a “lion,” casting himself as the helpful little “mouse,” offering Budapest as a venue to end the war on Russia’s terms, and closing with “I am at your service.”

The White House wonders why Europe won’t rally behind America in Iran. Maybe start by asking why your Vice President is flying to Budapest to have a warm chat with Viktor Orban, the man running a Russian influence operation from inside NATO’s borders. While Europe has been bleeding money and weapons to stop Russian aggression, Hungary has been blocking NATO decisions, sheltering Russian intelligence, and doing Moscow’s diplomatic dirty work at every turn. Orban isn’t America’s friend. He’s Putin’s man in Brussels. And JD Vance calls him a “good friend.” Europe is supposed to line up behind a war that had no plan for day two, no strategy for the Strait of Hormuz, and no consultation with allies beyond Israel. A war that has already sent oil past $100 a barrel and left one of America’s most powerful warships reportedly retreating toward the Indian Ocean. You don’t get to lecture Europe about loyalty while embracing the man working to destroy the alliance from within, and then demand backup for a war you started without asking anyone. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

😡 Un ilustrador catalán. 38 años cotizando como autónomo. Sin fallar un solo mes. En abril de 2025 hace los trámites de jubilación. Han pasado 12 meses. No cobra. Esto es lo que le ha pasado: Presenta la solicitud en la Seguridad Social de Terrassa. Le dicen que todo está correcto. Pasan tres meses sin respuesta. Vuelve a preguntar. Le informan de que su expediente se ha enviado a Cádiz. Nunca ha cotizado en Cádiz. Ni fuera de Cataluña. La explicación: "estaban saturados de trabajo." El expediente llega a Cádiz. Desde allí dicen que han encontrado "una irregularidad en 1988 y 1989." Devuelven el expediente a Cataluña. Cataluña lo revisa, ve que todo es correcto, y lo reenvía a Cádiz. Cádiz lo devuelve exigiendo que se explique "por qué es correcto." La pelota cambia de tejado tres veces. Nadie resuelve. Intenta hablar con la persona que lleva su expediente en Cádiz. Le dicen que está de vacaciones. Que ya le llamarán. Pasan dos meses. Nadie llama. Contrata a un gestor laboralista. El gestor envía un escrito a la Seguridad Social. El INSS tiene 40 días para responder. No responde. Silencio administrativo. El gestor consigue localizar al funcionario que lleva el caso. Sorpresa: ya no está en Cádiz. Lo han trasladado a Sevilla. Le dicen que le "darán prioridad." No se la dan. Escribe al Síndic de Greuges. Escribe al Defensor del Pueblo. La respuesta: "El documento ha entrado." Punto. Hoy, abril de 2026, este hombre lleva un año sin cobrar la pensión que le corresponde. Más de 11.000€ que no ha recibido. Y como no tiene la jubilación aprobada, tampoco puede acceder a su propio plan de pensiones. 38 años pagando. Ni un mes sin cotizar. Y el sistema no es capaz de tramitar su jubilación en 12 meses. No le han denegado la pensión. Eso tendría solución — recurres y listo. Lo que le hacen es peor: no le dicen ni sí ni no. Le marean. Le pasean el expediente entre tres ciudades. Le dejan en un limbo donde no trabaja, no cobra y no puede reclamar sin ir a juicio. Y si va a juicio, puede tardar otro año. Y las costas las paga él. Esto no es un caso aislado. Es el sistema funcionando como funciona: sin responsabilidad individual, sin plazos reales, sin consecuencias para quien no responde. Si le haces esto a un cliente, te denuncian. Si te lo hace la Administración, te dicen que "el documento ha entrado."

La propia nota de prensa confirma que siguen bloqueando lo que les da la gana. Si la app de localización usa a Github o Cloudflare como parte de su estructura crítica, terminarán bloqueados en España cuando hay partidos. Cosa que ya sucede. @Laliga miente con la tranquilidad que les da la impunidad de hacer lo que quieran bajo la mirada de aprobación de el gobierno y una sociedad en que el futbol importa más que los derechos fundamentales de los españoles.

Rusia sigue asesinando a niños en Ucrania pero esto no es noticia en muchos medios. ¿Es porque no hay judíos a los que culpar? ¿O es porque algunos medios dan prioridad a las versiones de dictaduras como Rusia, China e Irán sobre cualquier otra cosa?

Trump’s “victory timeline” claims. Mar 3: "We won the war." Mar 7: "We defeated Iran." Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." Mar 9: "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully." Mar 11: “You never like to say too ⁠early you won. We won. In ​the first hour it was over.” Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet." Mar 13: "We won the war." Mar 14: "Please help us." Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it." Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." Mar 16: "I was just testing to see who's listening to me." Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad." Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." Mar 17: "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO." Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip - step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 20: "NATO are cowards." Mar 21: "The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don't use it, we don't need to open it." Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait" Mar 22: "Iran is Dead" Mar 23: "We had very good and productive talks with Iran." Mar 24: "We’re making progress." Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.” Mar 26: "Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away." Mar 27: "We don’t have to be there for NATO." Mar 28: No major quote Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing Mar 30: "Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences." Mar 31: Claimed a deal was "very close" and that Iran would "do the right thing" Apr 1: "We’ll see what happens very soon." Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen." Apr 4: Said Iran must comply "immediately" or face further consequences. Apr 5: "Open the fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah." 😂

Kherson. Its streets have long been turned into a shooting range by russians. 📽 This is what a “human safari” looks like up close. Every day, russian FPV drones hunt innocent civilians—then the perpetrators brag about it on their channels. This is what russians are.

Un analista enviado al estrecho de Ormuz con 15.000$, un Xiaomi, un equipo de grabación oculta y un paquete de puros cubanos tumba el precio del barril del petróleo un -5,7%. 👇 - Firma un acuerdo en la frontera de Omán prometiendo no recopilar información. Lo ignora. - Se sube a una lancha sin GPS con un desconocido, se mete en el Estrecho de Ormuz mientras sobrevuelan drones y llega a 18 millas de la costa iraní. - Se da un baño en el mar mientras se fuma un puro. - La Guardia Costera lo detiene y le confisca el teléfono. - Consigue volver a casa y escribe un artículo para contar todo lo que vio. Lo que descubrió este analista de @citrini cambia todo el análisis de Wall Street: Los barcos apagan el GPS y falsean destinos → los datos “oficiales” no los cuentan → Wall Street cree que hay poco tráfico → Wall Street cree que el estrecho está cerrado → el precio del petróleo sube más de lo que debería Los datos que usan todos los hedge funds para valorar el riesgo en Ormuz tienen un punto ciego del 50%: Irán tiene 29 petroleros cargados moviéndose con transponders apagados. Han movido 3B$ en crudo hacia Malasia desde que empezó la guerra. Los generales retirados en la CNBC, los analistas de satélite y los traders de Bloomberg están mirando la mitad del tablero. Un tío en una lancha con un Xiaomi y unos cigarros ha obtenido mejor información que todos ellos. El precio del barril de petróleo cae de 115,50$ a 108,90$ en unas horas.

Un joven ataca a una familia de turistas con bebé para robarles en Barcelona. La izquierda a veces lo justifica porque "provocaban" luciendo un reloj valioso. No podemos normalizar estas barbaridades. Y el Gobierno lo regularizará en vez de deportarlo.

Joven pierde localización de su padre con demencia gracias a bloqueos Tebas Su padre tiene demencia y para tenerlo localizado lleva un GPS,el cual siempre falla en fin de semana gracias a los bloqueos de IP de Tebas. A lo que la liga ha hecho el comunicado siguiente… forocoches.com/foro/showthrea…

France Has Moved All Its Gold Out of the United States The Banque de France has completed a full withdrawal of its gold reserves from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Between July 2025 and January 2026, 129 tonnes of French gold stored in New York were sold and replaced with equivalent bullion purchased in Europe. All of France’s 2,437 tonnes of gold now sit in Paris. Every last bar. The timing is hard to ignore. With Trump tearing up the postwar rulebook and transatlantic trust at historic lows, France has quietly made sure its financial bedrock is no longer stored on American soil. The operation generated a 13 billion euro windfall on the back of record-high gold prices, turning a 7.7 billion euro loss in 2024 into an 8.1 billion euro profit in 2025. Macron essentially got paid to exit. And France is not alone. Germany still holds 1,236 tonnes of gold at the Federal Reserve, roughly 37 percent of its total reserves. The pressure to bring it home is building fast. Michael Jäger, head of the Association of German Taxpayers, has been blunt: Trump is unpredictable, does everything to generate revenue, and Germany’s gold is no longer safe in the Fed’s vaults. That is the mainstream conversation in Berlin. France has already acted. Germany is watching and calculating. The age of trusting Washington with Europe’s gold may be quietly coming to an end. As absolutely everything else. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

Iban a tomar el cielo por asalto pero al final se conformaron con tomar el sol en un chalet de 600.000 lereles

@JavierSanz @Bel_Arispocrita @keynutiiil @TuTu68279296 Parece un chico centrado y educado, este Javi. Voy a entrar en su página a que se siga ganando la vida con información irrelevante. PD: No 😁. Silenciado y no toco una web tuya ni con un puntero de ratón.

@Bel_Arispocrita @keynutiiil @TuTu68279296 Siempre es agradable llamar subnormal al que es subnormal, como es tu caso

¿De qué sirve ser el primero en GOOGLE si no te vas a llevar el CLICK? Absolutamente de nada. Nos roban la información y se quedan ellos la visita. Estamos todos muertos. Buscad "Prefijo 44" por ejemplo y lo veis... nadie pulsa en ADSLZone que es la primera

la web en cuestión: «nosotros y nuestros 945 socios necesitamos tu consentimiento» para que tú puedas saber que +44 es Reino Unido en una web con 5 anuncios

Applebaum's piece is worth reading slowly because the specific details are doing work that the summary can't. Danish military commanders - inside a NATO alliance the United States founded - had to sit in a room and war-game whether their forces would shoot down American planes and kill American soldiers. Some of them still haven't fully recovered from running that exercise. The most popular app in Denmark during Applebaum's visit was one that identifies American products so users know not to buy them. NATO has invoked Article 5 exactly once in its history. On behalf of the United States. After September 11th. Allied troops went to Afghanistan and some of them died there. Trump told reporters those allies "stayed a little back, a little off the front lines." The families of soldiers who didn't come back heard that. Now Trump is in the middle of a war in the Persian Gulf with the Strait of Hormuz locked, oil prices spiking, and he's telling NATO allies - the same ones he insulted and tariffed and threatened - that he's "demanding" they come help solve a problem his own decisions helped create. Applebaum's conclusion is precise: he doesn't connect what he does on one day to what happens weeks later. Allied leaders have drawn their conclusions. The rupture, as Mark Carney called it, isn't coming. It already happened.

100,000 American troops in Europe = a free ride for Europeans? Let's check the facts. 🔹 American military bases are not free Germany, Italy, Spain, and Romania pay for the infrastructure, land, utilities, and civilian personnel of US bases. Germany alone contributes over $1 billion annually to support the American military presence on its soil. 🔹 Europe is the largest customer of the American defense industry F-35s, Patriot missiles, HIMARS, Apaches — all purchased by Europeans with real money. Every security alarm in Europe translates into contracts for Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing. 🔹 American bases in Europe don't only protect Europe Ramstein in Germany coordinates operations across Africa and the Middle East. Sigonella in Italy covers the Mediterranean and North Africa. Romania secures the eastern flank and the Black Sea. These are global American strategic assets — not neighborhood security for Europeans. 🔹 Command is American, not European NATO is always led by an American Supreme Commander (SACEUR). Europe contributes troops, bases, and money — but America holds the controls. Those who control the structure are not the ones getting a free ride. 🔹 The nuclear umbrella is not altruism American nuclear deterrence in Europe keeps the dollar as the world's reserve currency, keeps European markets open to US corporations, and legitimizes American hegemony against Russia and China. But what would actually happen if America withdrew its troops from Europe? 🔹 For America — immediate strategic losses Without bases in Europe, American response time to any crisis in Europe, Africa, or the Middle East grows from hours to days. Ramstein, Sigonella, and Incirlik cannot be replaced by aircraft carriers. Infrastructure built over decades disappears overnight. 🔹 The American defense industry loses its biggest customer A Europe without the US umbrella will build its own defense industry — and fast. Airbus Military, KNDS, Leonardo, and Rheinmetall will take the contracts that Lockheed and Raytheon currently win. Billions of dollars shift from America to Europe. 🔹 The dollar weakens Dollar hegemony is partly sustained by American global military credibility. A withdrawal from Europe signals to the world that America no longer guarantees the postwar order. Alternatives — the euro, the yuan — become more attractive as global reserve options. 🔹 Russia wins without firing a single shot Not necessarily through immediate invasion — but through political influence, energy pressure, and the gradual destabilization of countries on the eastern frontier. The Baltic states, Poland, and Romania enter a security grey zone that no one can guarantee quickly. 🔹 China watches and draws conclusions about Taiwan A precedent of withdrawal from Europe sends a direct signal to Beijing: American commitments are negotiable. The cost of deterrence in the Pacific rises exponentially. Withdrawal is not isolationism. It is strategic abdication. America would not be leaving Europe because it no longer has interests there. It would be leaving while ignoring that those very interests are what make it a superpower. The "free ride" narrative doesn't describe Europe. It describes exactly what America has in Europe.

Right then. Let me explain something very slowly, because it appears some basic logic has gone missing somewhere over the Atlantic. No serious nation in the history of warfare has spent fourteen months insulting its allies, threatening to annex their territory, siding with their common enemy, and then knocked on their door expecting them to come running to rescue a catastrophe of its own making. That is not how alliances work. That is not how anything works. You abused the UK. You threatened Canada. You tried to grab Greenland. You called the EU an adversary. You praised Putin, the one man every serious NATO ally has spent decades preparing to fight. You hosted Kremlin officials in the Capitol. You undermined European elections. You abandoned Ukraine. You imposed tariffs on your closest partners. You did all of this loudly, proudly, and on camera. And now you are surprised that nobody is returning your calls. Here is a question worth sitting with. Why do you think that is? Is it possible, just possible, that when you treat your allies like enemies for over a year while cuddling up to their actual enemy, those allies might update their opinion of you? Is that concept too complicated? Does that require more working memory than is currently available? You did not plan this war with your allies. You did not consult them. You did not build a coalition. You started a conflict, watched it go sideways, and then got on your knees asking for help from people you spent fourteen months calling weak, corrupt and irrelevant. NATO is not what it was. Not because Europe changed. Because Washington made crystal clear which side it is on. And it is not ours. You want European boots on the ground? Start by explaining why America is more aligned with Moscow than with Brussels. Take your time. We will wait. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1