Del Knight

@Ollie_PAFC 2 shots 2 goals, that's how. Simple maths.

How we’ve lost to this team is beyond me, 10 men, didn’t play any good football, schuey was obviously sucking off the ref. Poor defending and poor in the final third, only player that did well today was Kane #pafc

Ball to hand 😂 #bwfc

Superb performance first half by Jack Bonham, 2nd half, everyone of em. #bwfc

@iseenowmyprob @peterqbrook @samdebendern @SariArhoHavren Probably nothing, I do know it's a lonely place without friends. These are some of the friends I made alongside the US in the last issue we had. If you think you're better alone then that's a shame.

@MrMajeeka @peterqbrook @samdebendern @SariArhoHavren What would the US lose by dropping this “special relationship“ facade? and kindly ask Starmer to keep his ppl OUT of US elections.

It is interesting how NATO's possible collapse is presented as solely Europe's problem, thereby justifying American pressure and threats on allies. In reality, a breakdown of NATO, an alliance of 32 members, would be a major strategic loss for the United States. The damage would not be limited to losing allies in Europe; as NATO gives Washington a large, institutionalised bloc of advanced economies and militaries that amplifies US power. If that structure unravelled, the US would lose a force multiplier at least across five main dimensions and would face : 1) harder military problems: The US would lose military access (the current situation with Spain, Italy and Poland gives a taste of what that would be like), and would lose interoperability and command advantages 2) higher budgetary burdens over time: removing the alliance architecture would force Washington to compensate for lost allied capability and lost access; allies would, in time, buy weapons from elsewhere; (it would be cheaper to repair the current rupture) 3) reduced geopolitical influence: US global credibility would be damaged far beyond Europe 4) greater economic exposure to European instability 5) weaker global deterrence against revisionist powers, which would not make the US homeland any safer The overall strategic impact would be severe, making the US considerably weaker diplomatically.

@0hour1 Everyone in Vietnam would be speaking English had it not been for Ho Chi Minh.

Everyone in the UK would be speaking German if not for the United States.

@Wafc1300 @OfficialBWFC

@OfficialBWFC Gonna be so funny when you don’t go up

A happy April Fools' Day in 2025! ✊😆 #bwfc

@iseenowmyprob @peterqbrook @samdebendern @SariArhoHavren I think you need a fishing trip to calm down bud. You are on one side of an argument which ends in everybody losing.

@peterqbrook @samdebendern @SariArhoHavren He showed us who are actual allies are.. Fuck you England.

Mention one thing the EU is better at than the US and China.

@snyff Okay, I'll try tomorrow.

DO NOT JAVASCRIPT TODAY. I REPEAT: DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, JAVASCRIPT TODAY.

@MaMoMVPY $$$

This is again complete and utter bullish. LLMs are nowhere near human intelligence. And Amodei knows this. The question is why do he keep lying about it?

@StanCollymore As inspiring as Lee Dixon's punditry.

England supporters, your in depth, insightful and erudite full time appraisal of England 1 Uruguay 1, please. 👇🏽

Lee Dixon back pedalling on that penalty. Absolute nailed on.

@Keg767 Do we get a cut of the bonus when we give a decent shortcut?

This is bad. Very bad. There should be no financial incentives for stuff like this. As an example, I do a Flap 3 landing wherever I can. But there are certain runway configs where I can’t do it. So I lose my bonus because of decisions by ATC? What compromised choice do I then..

@CallsignTaken @SkyNews Pay for it then and stop whinging.

@MrMajeeka @SkyNews No, I need water. It's a fundamental human right. Vets, they're not. At least I don't remember seeing them on the ECHR I was reading last week.

BREAKING: A price cap will be placed on pet prescriptions, the Competition and Markets Authority has announced Pet owners will pay a maximum of £21 for their first prescription and £12.50 for any other medicines 🔗 Read more trib.al/ooH4b0E

@CallsignTaken @SkyNews Owning a pet comes with responsibility, agreed. But this is about fair pricing where there’s no alternative. You can’t wait or shop around in emergencies. You called out Southern Water for unfair costs, but now it’s “just pay it.” Same issue, different industry.

@MrMajeeka @SkyNews So don't get a pet. Anyone who has a pet knows they have to pay for healthcare. It's really not that hard.

@CallsignTaken @SkyNews You're talking about paying for convenience and not waiting for the free alternative. Animals don't have this luxury. They know what people will do and pay for the animals they love.

@SkyNews For those complaining about pricing, I'll ask you this. Have you ever paid for private medical intervention? Because it's considerably more than a vet. X-Rays can hit £250. £100 for a 5 minute private GP appointment.

@Travel_Up Bit of a disgrace. 3 weeks and not one reply? Are your lot typing with one finger? Gonna have to be some mega discounts in future to even get us to look.

@_sHx_ @shanaka86 Why ask for help then?

@shanaka86 It is only one submarine, carrying 30 or so Tomahawks, which is about one-tenth of all Tomahawks fired in the war so far. So much exaggeration for such tiny firepower. UK involvement is symbolic at best.

BREAKING. The country President Trump called “very late as usual” just parked a nuclear submarine within Tomahawk range of Iran. HMS Anson, an Astute-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, is now positioned in the northern Arabian Sea with cruise missiles capable of reaching targets deep inside Iranian territory. Britain did not announce this with a press conference. The Daily Mail published the positioning. The submarine speaks for itself. HMS Anson left Perth earlier this month and traveled 5,500 miles to the Arabian Sea. It carries Tomahawk Block IV cruise missiles and Spearfish heavyweight torpedoes. Its Rolls-Royce reactor will not need refuelling for 25 years. Its pump-jet propulsor makes it one of the quietest submarines in any navy. It does not need to surface to strike. It does not need permission from Washington. Starmer authorises launches through Permanent Joint Headquarters at Northwood. This is a British weapon under British command. The sequence matters. On the first day of the war, Iran fired two intermediate-range ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia, a British territory in the Indian Ocean. Neither hit. Trump publicly criticised the UK as “very late” and “disappointing” in its response. Starmer initially hesitated on US requests to use British bases for strike operations. Then Britain authorised the use of UK bases, including Diego Garcia, for operations to prevent Iran from attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded by warning that British lives are now at risk. Britain responded by sending a submarine that can put a Tomahawk through a window in Tehran from underwater without surfacing. The escalation ladder from “very late” to nuclear attack submarine took less than three weeks. Starmer’s calculation is not ideological. It is economic. The UK imports significant quantities of LNG and oil through Gulf supply routes. The Strait of Hormuz carries approximately 20 percent of global seaborne oil trade. British energy prices are already surging from the Hormuz closure. British pharmaceutical supply chains depend on Indian manufacturers who depend on Gulf crude. The same supply-chain vulnerability that connects Modi’s Nowruz phone call to Ohio pharmacies connects Starmer’s submarine deployment to British gas bills. The submarine is not defending democracy. It is defending heating costs. The Astute-class is the most capable attack submarine Britain has ever built. Seven are planned. Five have been commissioned. HMS Anson, the fifth, entered service in 2022. At 97 metres and 7,800 tonnes submerged, it carries a crew of 98 in a hull designed to operate at depths exceeding 300 metres. It is smaller than the American Virginia-class but rated quieter by multiple independent assessments. It carries fewer missiles but needs fewer sailors. In a strait where stealth matters more than volume, the boat that cannot be heard is more dangerous than the fleet that can be seen. The UK is now the third nation with strike capability deployed in the war theatre, after the United States and Israel. France has the Charles de Gaulle carrier group for air operations. Greece has a Patriot battery defending Saudi refineries. Twenty-three nations signed a statement. But only Britain has put a nuclear-powered platform carrying land-attack cruise missiles underwater in the Arabian Sea with the authority to fire them on the Prime Minister’s order. Trump said late. Starmer sent a submarine. The missile it carries can reach Tehran. The reactor that powers it will not need fuel until 2047. And the man who authorises the launch is the same man Iran threatened by name when it said British lives are at risk. The threat was noted. The submarine arrived. Full analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@OfficialBWFC First one out the door in summer. Should've been replaced along with Forino and Johnston. Legacy Evatt issues rearing their heads at a similar time.

🎙️ Eoin Toal spoke to Wanderers TV after today's game. #bwfc

@OfficialBWFC @officialcarmats Schumacher out thinking himself. Absolute disgusting performance from a team that is trying to get promoted. Toal, Johnston, Forino. Like watching the Titanic turn when teams attack.

Defeat this afternoon. #bwfc | @officialcarmats