C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺

6.9K posts

C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 banner
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺

C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺

@Mr_Algific

27 ✝️🎗

Katılım Haziran 2020
302 Takip Edilen301 Takipçiler
Dexerto
Dexerto@Dexerto·
A judge has decided that if ChudTheBuilder makes bond, he will be required to: - Wear a GPS ankle monitor - Surrender his weapons - Avoid giving interviews - Avoid posting about the incident on social media
Dexerto tweet mediaDexerto tweet media
English
271
239
6.4K
286.7K
Culture Crave 🍿
Culture Crave 🍿@CultureCrave·
Lupita Nyong’o on the discourse around her casting as Helen of Troy in ‘The Odyssey’ ⚔️ “this is a mythological story” “I’m very supportive of Chris’s intention with it and with the version of this story that he is telling. Our cast is representative of the world. I’m not spending my time thinking of a defense. The criticism will exist whether I engage with it or not” (via @ELLEmagazine)
Culture Crave 🍿 tweet mediaCulture Crave 🍿 tweet media
English
591
159
2.1K
225.5K
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
Seed Oil Disrespecter™️
Seed Oil Disrespecter™️@SeedOilDsrspctr·
Unless there are some clips I haven’t seen…. This makes me wonder if most of History is fake
Seed Oil Disrespecter™️ tweet media
English
128
219
3.6K
27K
Pop Base
Pop Base@PopBase·
New look at Zendaya as Athena in ‘The Odyssey.’ (via ELLE) In theatres on July 17.
Pop Base tweet media
English
302
574
18.2K
473K
Kumashun🇯🇵🐻💎
Kumashun🇯🇵🐻💎@isfjcutebear·
🇯🇵Just in: Japan government just announced their new population policy ▶️"If we give foreigners Japanese citizenship, there would be no such problem as population decline"
English
255
88
528
19K
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
Serf
Serf@TheRoyalSerf·
UPDATE: ChudTheBuilder is going to win his case and walk free
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English
20
46
1.2K
40.6K
Antony Vo
Antony Vo@AntonyVo·
Free @ChudTheBuilder he is innocent. I just saw clear video evidence Joshua Fox attacking and threatening Dalton Eatherly’s life.
English
558
791
6.4K
292.8K
Autumn Christian
Autumn Christian@teachrobotslove·
@JamesMMiller2 I stopped watching the second season, when I realized that people's actions were excused or condemned based on whether the showrunners had placed them in the "good" or "bad" category.
English
7
4
157
10.5K
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
Oilfield Rando
Oilfield Rando@Oilfield_Rando·
I just can’t. I just can’t accept that my government takes my money to bring these people here and then takes more of my money to buy all their shit and then takes more of my money to bankroll all of their flagrant Medicaid scams. It’s entirely unacceptable.
Oilfield Rando tweet mediaOilfield Rando tweet media
AF Post@AFpost

Somali daycare owners featured in Nick Shirley's YouTube video have been charged with fraud in a $4.6M scheme. Follow: @AFpost

English
887
9.9K
48.8K
1M
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
🚨UPDATE: Minnesota fraudster is charged for childcare fraud. Fahima Mahamud received 3.67 million dollars for her “daycare” and tried to escape America prior. This is the SAME daycare where the $250 million dollar “feeding our future” scam took place ARREST ALL THE FRAUDSTERS
English
1.4K
18.7K
89.8K
1.2M
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
J.T. Alexander
J.T. Alexander@JTAlexander·
“And he’s so cowardly and blubbering and pathetic, as are most strong men when you remove their power and they’re and they’re faced with their imminent death, they rarely handle it bravely.” This quote alone proves to you that Kripke is a Revenge of the Nerds type coward and weakling. This single sentence says so much about this man. He thinks “strength” means “power,” and thus rationalizes his own weakness as merely an absence of real power, acquisition of which would be a major sin. He believes his weakness is a virtue. This is absolutely typical of Hollywood writer types. This is why they write stories featuring jocks as low IQ meatheads, when in reality most of the great men of history were both athletes and intellectuals (Plato and Nixon as two great examples millennia apart). They misunderstand “blessed are the meek” as “blessed are the weak.” People like Kripke cannot believe in real strength and real courage because *they* could never feel it. He can’t even imagine it. All those strong and brave men are, secretly, just as chicken shit as he is. The only thing separating Kripke and Audie Murphy is that Audie Murphy had power—or something like that. I don’t care about this show, never have watched a single episode, and have never understood the appeal. But everything I have seen and heard of the showrunner leads me to believe without any doubt that he is the most dangerous kind of person—an utterly weak and cowardly man that cannot even imagine being a stronger and braver one. Be very wary of weak men.
Emir Han@RealEmirHan

In The Boys finale, Homelander had to look powerless according to Eric Kripke “Yeah, it was really important to us for Homelander to at least experience a little bit of time powerless.” “People have asked me, ‘Well, why don’t you send him out in the world powerless, wouldn’t that be the ultimate punishment?’ “I’m like, it would, until he gets his hands on some more Compound V, and then you’re back to where you started.” “So, he cannot walk out of that room alive, but we can spend time with him powerless to really reveal what everyone’s been saying all season, which is, ‘Take away those powers and you are nothing.’ “And he’s so cowardly and blubbering and pathetic, as are most strong men when you remove their power and they’re and they’re faced with their imminent death, they rarely handle it bravely.”

English
246
798
8.9K
377.2K
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi
C🅰️RS🅾️N 🌧️ 🌺 retweetledi