Mandy Dawn

@JedSkillman @ThomasSowell She seems to be representing the majority of MAGA voters that elected Trump based on his "no new wars" promise & opposition to regime change.

@ThomasSowell Megyn Kelly is a lawyer. She is trained to argue her client’s case, be it someone who spilled hot coffee on themselves or a gang banger who shot up a playground… So, the question is who are her clients?

Megyn Kelly on the Iran War: “As this thing goes south, we need to know exactly who talked [President Trump] into it and what representations were made to convince the president that this was a good idea. Who? Who specifically?”

Most Americans wouldn’t recognize a coup even if a foreign government bought the Congress and the major media, ran an intelligence agency driven blackmail scheme compromising top officials, pushed us into a war that isn’t ours, and had politicians lining up to pledge loyalty abroad; flying over for photo ops to kiss walls while neglecting their own people. Good thing nothing like that is happening.

If a vaccine injures your child, you can't sue the company that made it. They have a special legal shield no one voted for. My End the Vaccine Carve Out Act changes that.

This needs to change

@elonmusk It definitely seems like a double standard in some circumstances.

@BishStrick Very well put 👏

Statement regarding Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller   In recent days, I have become aware of the removal of Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller from the Presidential Religious Liberty Commission, along with the public accusations that have followed. After reviewing her account and the circumstances surrounding this matter, I believe it is necessary to speak plainly.   Ms. Boller has been treated unjustly.   A Catholic woman, speaking from a well-formed conscience and in fidelity to the teachings of the Church, has been publicly criticized and removed – yet no clear, substantiated reason has been provided. Such a lack of transparency does not serve justice. It damages reputations and undermines trust.   More troubling still is the apparent cause: that she raised legitimate questions about Zionism and defended the simple truth that Catholics are not bound to any political ideology.   Let me be clear.   The Catholic Church does not teach that the modern State of Israel holds a divine mandate that must be supported by all believers. Nor does the Church teach that opposition to political Zionism is inherently antisemitic. These are not doctrines of the Catholic faith.   At the same time, the Church unequivocally rejects all hatred toward the Jewish people. Every human person is to be loved, defended, and treated with dignity. But this truth must not be distorted. To question the policies or actions of a modern nation – any nation – is not hatred. It is a moral responsibility when innocent life is at stake.   We are witnessing great suffering in the Holy Land. Innocent men, women, and children – especially in Gaza – have endured immense devastation. To speak on behalf of human life, wherever it is threatened, is not political extremism. It is fidelity to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.   Mrs. Boller did what many are now afraid to do: she spoke.   She spoke for Catholics who are increasingly pressured to conform to political narratives that do not reflect the fullness of our faith. She spoke to ensure that antisemitism is not wrongly conflated with legitimate moral concern. She spoke for the dignity of all human life – Jew and Palestinian alike.   For this, she has been mischaracterized.   It is especially disheartening when such treatment appears to come, in part, from those within the Church who should be the first to defend the faithful when they speak truthfully and in good conscience. Shepherds are called to protect, not to abandon; to clarify, not to confuse; to stand with the sheep, especially when they are under attack.   Silence in the face of injustice is not prudence. It is a failure of charity and truth. Therefore, I express my support for Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller.   I affirm her right, as a Catholic and as an American, to speak clearly about matters of faith, morality, and public life without being unjustly labeled or removed without explanation. I also call for greater clarity and fairness from those responsible for her removal, so that truth – not speculation – may prevail.   This moment calls for courage.   Not political courage, but Christian courage – the kind that stands firmly in truth while remaining rooted in charity. We must reject hatred in all its forms, but we must also reject the misuse of that charge to silence those who speak in defense of life and moral truth.   Let us pray for peace in the Holy Land – for Jews, for Palestinians, and for all who suffer. And let us pray for the Church, that she may always speak with clarity, charity, and unwavering fidelity to Jesus Christ, who is the Truth.   In Christ, Bishop Joseph E. Strickland

Did you know that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have been studied for decades? The science behind mRNA technology isn't "new," and unfortunately, neither are its historical failures in animal testing. @DrKellyVictory

#ambition #wisdom #dreams #growth #peace #confidence #ego #doubt

The late Chuck Norris on why he left the left: “I used to be a Democrat, but unfortunately the Democrats went too far to the left... lost all reality of what America stood for… I realised that Republicans... are more focused on what is best for America.”

REPORT: Newly resurfaced CIA documents reveal the U.S. military didn’t just study the weather, they were actively working to control it, weaponize it, and reshape warfare itself. And if that sounds too far-fetched, the paper trail shows this wasn’t theory, it was already underway decades ago. Declassified CIA-era files outline plans to manipulate storms, trigger floods, and disrupt enemy infrastructure using the weather itself. By the late 1960s, programs like Project Popeye were already extending monsoon seasons in Vietnam to cripple supply lines. A later Air Force document goes even further, detailing a strategy to “own the weather” by 2025 and treat it as a full-spectrum weapon. Officials have long framed this as battlefield-only technology, but the scale and ambition behind these programs suggest far wider implications, including potential civilian impact that can’t be ignored. So how far did this actually go, and what’s still happening behind the scenes today? @zeeemedia's report connects the dots most people still haven’t seen. 👇 rumble.com/v77aybm-msm-ad…

“I promise you… that we will never let this happen again.” Assistant Secretary for Health, Admiral Brian Christine promises the country will never return to how Americans were treated during Covid. “Under the previous administration… truth was sidelined, science was weaponized, and our rights as Americans, as parents, and most fundamentally as humans made in the image of God, were infringed upon.” “Our citizens were coerced, they were lied to, and they were intimidated with fear.” “Physicians like myself and nurses were threatened with loss of license.” “And voices crying out in the wilderness, like @SecKennedy or @NIHDirector_Jay, were canceled.”

There’s a viral tend going on where you post photos of “What were you like in the 90's?” An American made a video of the viral trend but instead of making the video about themself, they made it about our skies in America This video got over 55,000+ Likes in under 24 hours “Society seemed healthier when we had the 90's”

A resurfaced video shows a young Alex Jones warning about private banks controlling the money supply and the rise of biometric tracking. This was 30 YEARS ago.

On June 18th, I had a text exchange with Charlie Kirk. He said he was spending two full days at the White House trying to persuade President Trump not to initiate a war with Iran. Given that Charlie was close with the President and that he represented a large constituency essential to Trump, and given that many proponents of the war with Iran saw a U.S. attack as urgently necessary to the survival of Israel, it is reasonable to wonder if his refusal to back down from his steadfast opposition somehow resulted in his murder. A good investigation could have settled the matter. What we got only increases the reason for concern. Asking this question may be unforgivable, but it is in no way unreasonable. Charlie was in a strong position to keep us from doing what we have now done, and the timing of his death removed him from the equation and likely changed the course of history--as Charlie himself worried it might.

The Epstein Affair is not going away. Every sane, decent human knows you do not abuse children and the stripes on pedophiles come in all colors and classes. If you abuse a child, and it is clear many elites did, these people must be held accountable. No one is excused. And despite Epstein being an Intel asset or not, the lure was children for the degenerates he was able to entice. Make accountability great again.

@canammissing Not sure who is to blame, but it is worth taking a look at who is in control over the Cyber Security for the hospital and that platform. Unfortunately our country has historically had a pattern of false flag attacks to gain support for unpopular wars.

Stryker is a medical device company that is a major supplier in the hospital arena. They suffered a huge attack on their Microsoft related platforms. Several sites are reporting that Iran is taking responsibility. #1- it was an attack through their Microsoft platform and isolated to that. In the past year there have been several articles about Microsoft hiring CCP engineers. #2- Iran and CCP are tied at the hip. Both support each other. #3-The CCP is not happy we infiltrated Venezuela and now Iran. Who is the real perpetrator that infiltrated Stryker? fox17online.com/news/local-new…

The Senate must enact the will of the people

@MJTruthUltra 👑

Unbelievably stupid… 🚨 Ted Cruz says the phrase “CHRIST IS KING” is being used as an online Code-Word to say “I hate the Jews” Drop a 👑 if you believe Christ is King and you don’t hate Jews. rumble.com/v772ada-ted-cr…