ras retweetledi
ras
23 posts

ras
@Mukmier
◢◤ | newbie cyclist | Macro & Fixed Income
Katılım Haziran 2020
37 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler

@thinkorseek wkwk I still remember our chat back in March about how BI 'seemed' late to hike rates. At least our discussion 2 months ago basically pointed to 2 rate hikes in the end anyway 🤣
English

@notintofinance lagi cari Report Designer nih
Job descnya simpel, cuma design analysis yang udah kita bikin jadi report yg rapih & engaging:
1. Diutamakan mahasiswa
2. Fully paid & remote working
3. Kalo bisa asik, krn kita kerja sambil ngelantur wkwkwk
Bisa langsung dm gue aja ya dan lgsg kirim portfolio / cv 🧙♂️
#infoloker #infomagang

Indonesia
ras retweetledi

US Treasury 30-year yields are now above 5%, sitting around 5.06%, and that is globally consequential especially when it is happening alongside rising JGB yields in Japan.
The issue is not simply that developed market yields are moving higher. The real issue is that the global risk-free rate itself is repricing upward at the same time fiscal deficits, geopolitical risks, and inflation uncertainty remain elevated.
For emerging markets, this matters enormously. If you are an economy running a current account deficit, you structurally require capital account inflows to help fund that imbalance. In other words, you need foreign capital to keep coming in consistently. Once US long-end yields move above 5% while Japan also begins offering higher domestic yields, global capital suddenly has more attractive lower-risk alternatives.
That naturally raises the question: what level of compensation are emerging markets offering investors for taking additional currency risk, governance risk, liquidity risk, and policy risk? This is fundamentally a risk premium discussion.
When global liquidity was abundant and developed market yields were near zero, investors were forced further out along the risk curve into EM equities, EM bonds, private markets, and frontier assets. But once the US Treasury market itself begins offering historically attractive nominal yields again, the hurdle rate for EM capital allocation rises materially.
Countries with strong institutions, credible policy frameworks, current account surpluses, stable currencies, and predictable regulation can still attract capital. But weaker macro structures become increasingly exposed because global investors no longer need to stretch for yield the way they did during the zero-rate era.
This is also why several EM currencies continue struggling despite officially solid growth numbers. Capital ultimately flows toward the best risk-adjusted returns, not simply the highest headline growth rates.
In Indonesia’s case, the situation becomes more sensitive because the economy still relies meaningfully on foreign participation across bonds, equities, and strategic investment flows. At the same time, markets are increasingly questioning policy consistency, regulatory predictability, fiscal transparency, and the broader investment climate following recent developments around commodity policies, DHE rules, downstream regulations, and institutional governance concerns.
That does not mean Indonesia lacks long-term potential. Structurally, the country still possesses major advantages through demographics, natural resources, industrialization ambitions, and strategic positioning within global supply chains. But in a higher global yield environment, investors become significantly more selective.
The spread between Indonesian assets and developed market risk-free yields must now compensate investors adequately for: 1) currency volatility, 2) policy uncertainty, 3) governance concerns, 4) liquidity risk, and 5) external funding dependence. If that compensation becomes insufficient, capital outflows and rupiah pressure can intensify even if headline domestic growth remains relatively solid.
This is ultimately why credibility matters so much. In a world where the US Treasury itself yields above 5%, emerging markets can no longer rely purely on growth narratives. They increasingly need institutional credibility, predictable policy frameworks, and investor confidence to compete for global capital.
The broader implication is that the world may be entering a structurally higher cost-of-capital regime. In that environment, risk premiums matter more, policy credibility matters more, and institutional quality matters more.
Cheap global liquidity is no longer there to hide structural weaknesses.
English
ras retweetledi
ras retweetledi
ras retweetledi

Hard to believe it’s been 10 years since AlphaGo! It was wonderful to catch up with Lee Sae Dol last week in Korea and join Shin Jin-seo for a special Go match. Great to reminisce about AlphaGo & super interesting to hear how it changed the way players approach the game of Go!


Demis Hassabis@demishassabis
#AlphaGo WINS!!!! We landed it on the moon. So proud of the team!! Respect to the amazing Lee Sedol too
English
ras retweetledi

@PeterMcCormack I think this combination is perfect for opines on economics and its impact on investment instruments, especially bonds. Feel free to add if you have any other suggestions..


English


























