Musing On Coffee

13.4K posts

Musing On Coffee banner
Musing On Coffee

Musing On Coffee

@MusingOnCoffee

Christian. Husband. Dad. American. 1689 2LBC.

Florida, USA Katılım December 2022
1.9K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler

2026 Yıllık Özeti

@MusingOnCoffee hesabının Twitter yılını gör

Irlandarra
Irlandarra@irlandarra2019·
Candace Owens has dropped a massive spreadsheet exposing ties between Erika Kirk’s Romanian orphanage and a sex trafficking organization Testimony by a Romanian woman who knows exactly what Romanian Angles Ministry allegedly did, trafficking 86,000 children from poor families. this is the truth about Erika Kirk.
English
190
4.3K
10.3K
216K
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
So dumb. If Israel was committing a holocaust, there would be closer to 2 million dead instead of 100k. The Gazans have no power to stop them, nor ever did. You're entire premise is make believe. In war, people die. You're a part of the most naive, spoiled generation in human history. Congrats.
English
0
0
1
4
ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸
Candace Owens: "Judaism is a faith, Israel is a state, what Netanyahu has done to the Palestinians since Oct 7 is a holocaust.’ No lies detected.
English
436
4.4K
29.4K
372.9K
sophie:)
sophie:)@bittersexyhag·
Kid I babysit for telling me his favorite country is Israel unprompted…
GIF
English
182
3.1K
81.4K
1.7M
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
@Trew_Jew Yup. There is no context to this thread. Your racism doesn't place you on the racist's side at all. How retarded of me to remember there's a context to this thread. You're a racist.
English
1
0
0
14
Christ’s Handsomest Swoledier
I’m noticing racism because it’s his idol and it has been for years, at least. Or did you forget about the Mahler debate where he claimed that the statement “race is real” is damning?
English
1
1
0
65
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
@MistMistsku Pepper spray. Could've gotten them both in one go and walked away. Also without seriously injuring them.
English
0
0
1
285
Mist
Mist@MistMistsku·
Two Black males tried to assault and harass a white man’s wife. The husband stepped in to defend her, knocked one out cold but was dropped by the second Black male😤😧
English
1.4K
216
5.3K
4.9M
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
This is said as a non-dispensationalist. If John's stance was so hopeless, then why does he have the largest evangelistic reach in modern history? Why wasn't he without hope? Why was he constantly evangelizing? The reason why I think most people are upset with Jeff's take is because it ignores every other doctrinal reasons one might have hope outside of eschatology, and even within dispensationalism. Furthermore, it ignores the fruit of his life.
English
0
0
2
49
🎸 Matt 🎸
🎸 Matt 🎸@ChristandGuitar·
I like Jeff Durbin and I like John MacArthur. I don’t agree with either of them on everything, and that’s fine. Mature Christians can have heated theological debate without breaking fellowship. Coming from a postmillennial perspective, Jeff’s assessment in this clip isn’t primarily a mischaracterization — though I understand why some are taking it that way. He’s expressing genuine frustration with the lack of continuity between an eschatological system and its practical outworking in the world. If someone believes the church will be raptured out of this world, that the present age ends in increasing darkness and destruction, yet still insists we must work and vote for the betterment of this material world, the question becomes: why? In the dispensational premillennial framework John held, the trajectory of this age is one of deterioration. Christians remain a minority, evil advances, and the church does not achieve lasting cultural transformation until the millennium after Christ’s return. The consistent expectation he taught was: “we lose down here.” What, then, is the motivation for pouring energy into building up the institutions of this world if, in that eschatology, the church ends up losing in history? That’s the heart of Jeff’s criticism. If the real issue is his tone, we can find examples of imperfect presentation from respected teachers on both sides. People aren’t perfect. As Christians we need to be slow to speak, quick to forgive, and strive at all times to be peacemakers.
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty

I don’t know too much about Jeff Durbin. From the relatively little I’ve heard, I thought he was a man of character, but watching his disrespectful and slanderous handling of John MacArthur’s teaching in this podcast episode actually brought tears to my eyes. I couldn’t finish it. I don’t know the motives in the hearts of these men that would cause them to post such an egregious misrepresentation of MacArthur’s beliefs, but a clear-thinking person would actually have to work to butcher his meaning and miss it this badly. To accuse such a faithful and consistent man of “ping-ponging,” being inconsistent, and not making sense, and perhaps even most arrogant and dishonoring of all, to attribute MacArthur’s bold action of defying the government to obey God during COVID of him being inconsistent to his own eschatological beliefs and behaving as though he held theirs is truly appalling and petty behavior. The sarcastic and disrespectful responses seen here in this clip are shocking. If these men didn’t actually know why MacArthur taught what he did, they would have been far better off to stay quiet and seek out the answers from the over 50 years of clear and faithful teaching that MacArthur left behind. They could have found the answers within minutes. Instead, we get this. Shameful.

English
37
4
31
4.9K
Samuel Sey
Samuel Sey@SlowToWrite·
I finally watched The Odyssey. I’ll save my thoughts on it for an article or a YouTube video…or both. All I’ll say for now is, some of you have DISQUALIFIED yourselves from ever being taken seriously again when it comes to movies.
English
41
1
198
36.3K
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
Personally, I'm no longer a dispensationalist, nor have been for years. I also think eschatology and the different hermeneutics that arise around them should be debated and discussed. Commonly. However, far too often, I find the elevation of secondary doctrines to a level that is unhealthy to be far more of a problem than believing the wrong hermeneutic or secondary error. I've seen church discipline and church slips due to such issues far too often. Take Martin Luther's take on Zwingli's view on the Lord's Supper. It neared the level that Luther didn't believe he was converted, though he gave a little wiggle room, and wouldn't fellowship with him. How many issues are there like this? Lord's Supper, Human will, God's sovereignty, Human depravity, Election, Baptism, Head coverings, Etc., and yes, Eschatology. Ultimately, we're all wrong on something. There are too many doctrines that aren't as exhaustively taught throughout scripture as the essentials are. Keeping essentials as essential and secondary as secondary won't just allow friends to stay friends, but its essential for unity. We've all been there. Especially new Christians, or those who realize they've been wrong for years, become very zealous when their eyes are opened. But if its not an essential doctrine, even if it would benefit those you love the most, isn't essential for them to believe or to affect their standing with Christ. Neither are they any less wise. It is the Holy Spirit that removes the blinders. For some reason, He does it when he desires, and doesn't give us all perfect doctrine. That's according to His good will.
English
0
0
1
46
Sophisticated Fido.
Sophisticated Fido.@Christo44229571·
I wouldn't say dispensationalism is heresy but it certainly needs to be put to the side and not be used to understand scripture. I used to be a dispensationalist. Only because that is what I was told. Like most are. That was 30 years ago. What I learned is that it regularly takes Scripture out of its literary, historical, and canonical context. The entire structure of distinct “dispensations” as tested periods of time, the postponement of the kingdom, and the pretribulational rapture are later theological constructs read into passages rather than drawn out of them. The early church, the Reformers, and the majority of historic premillennialists did not find these categories in the same texts. What made me change my mind. John Macarthur did. His quote The timing of the rapture “cannot be conclusively determined from this passage alone” (commenting on 1 Thessalonians 4). No solitary text makes the entire case by itself. The position emerges when multiple passages are compared (1 Thessalonians 4, John 14:1–3, 1 Corinthians 15:51–52, Revelation 3:10, the absence of the church in Revelation 4–18, the distinction between rapture passages that contain no judgment language and second-coming passages that do, the doctrine” That bothered me enough for me to ask why not? Dispensationalism is a must if you want to try to support something that scripture contradicts. Simple as that. His mention of 1 Thessalonians 4 does indeed give us the timing. When you learn that Paul and the other apostles paraphrased the Olivet discourse then you understand that Scripture supports the timing of the resurrection/Rapture. For clarification Paraphrasing means putting someone else's ideas into your own words while keeping the original meaning the same Or having the same context. That makes sense because we are dealing with multiple individual accounts. Text co text context. Text: 1 thes 4:16-18 For the Lord himself shall. DESCEND from heaven with a SHOUT , with the voice of the ARCHANGEL and with the TRUMP of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be CAUGHT UP TOGETHER with THEM in the CLOUDS , to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. 18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words. Cotext: Matthew 24:30-31 And then shall appear the sign of the SON OF MAN IN HEAVEN : and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the SON OF MAN COMING in the CLOUDS of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send his ANGELES with a great sound of a TRUMPET , and they shall GATHER TOGETHER HIS ELECT from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. Context In the clouds said Jesus in the clouds said Paul with the angels said Jesus with the angels said Paul with a shout said Jesus with a shout said Paul With a trumpet said Jesus With a trumpet said Paul gather together said Jesus gather together said Paul Resurrection/rapture at the 6th seal. Scripture is meant to be joined together not separated. Another example Paul wrote, 2 Thessalonians 1:7 and give relief to you who are troubled, and to us as well this will happen when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven in blazing fire with his powerful angels. Christ said, Matthew 24: 29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. (Jesus is revealed from heaven 👇👇) 30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. (with his powerful angels.👇👇) 31 And he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. God bless
English
1
0
0
96
Ryan Denton
Ryan Denton@TexasPreacher·
John MacArthur is not above criticism. He was a good man, full of the right stuff, we could use a hundred more of him, but his dispensationalism was a tremendous problem. Are we not allowed to say as much?
English
121
22
447
24.2K
#StopCopCity
#StopCopCity@ChuckModi1·
Minnesota Lynx Coach Cheryl Reeve for the win with “Trans Kids Belong” shirt, no matter what the mob says.
#StopCopCity tweet media
English
1.1K
166
2.5K
114.1K
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
@JamieBraziel You aren't taking your own advice about being equally measured in this post about being equally measured.
English
0
0
0
18
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
This.
Matthew Fledderjohann@mfledd

A few further thoughts on the Durbin–MacArthur controversy and the distinction between losing here and overcoming in Christ: Revelation 6:9–11 portrays faithful saints being slain because of the word of God, while Revelation 12:11 says that they overcame by the blood of the Lamb and did not love their lives even unto death. They may be killed on earth and yet overcome in Christ. That is the distinction I understood MacArthur to be making when he said, “We don’t win down here, we lose,” and then clarified, “We lose on this battlefield, but we win on the big one, the eternal one.” His examples were explicit: “It killed Jesus. It killed all the apostles,” and, “They killed Him, they killed the apostles, and in every generation they kill the people who proclaim the truth.” The world really does hate Christ and those who belong to Him, just as Christ taught. MacArthur spoke about persecution, suffering, and death on this earthly battlefield. His statement did not deny every temporal victory, providential mercy, advance of the gospel, or season of rest granted throughout church history. The church may experience genuine fruitfulness and deliverance in this age while still suffering real losses until Christ returns. Yet even when the saints are persecuted, dispossessed, or killed, they overcome in Christ and will be openly vindicated when He comes. Revelation 6 and 12 display that pattern plainly. Micah expresses the same hope in God’s vindication: “Do not rejoice over me, O my enemy. Though I fall I will rise; though I dwell in darkness, Yahweh is a light for me. I will bear the indignation of Yahweh because I have sinned against Him, until He pleads my case and executes justice for me. He will bring me out to the light, and I will look on His righteousness” (Micah 7:8–9). Perhaps some expectations of continual growth and earthly victory have been shaped more by the unusual peace and prosperity experienced in the United States over the past half century than by the experience of much of the church throughout history. The United States has been an instrument of many real blessings, but it has also promoted and participated in much evil. Its prosperity and influence should not be confused with the victory of Christ’s kingdom. Yet none of this is a reason for passivity or despair. On the contrary, we are to be steadfast and immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that our labor in the Lord is not in vain (1 Corinthians 15:58). We must always be ready to give a defense to anyone who asks about the hope within us (1 Peter 3:15). What is that hope? It is not confidence that every faithful labor will produce the earthly results we desire, that we will necessarily see revival, or that the church will finally triumph over the rebellious world before Christ returns. We may see visible fruit and revival according to God’s will, but our hope rests in Jesus Christ, crucified, risen, reigning, and coming again. In Him we have forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, and eternal life. Our final and public vindication will come when our Lord returns, raises us bodily, and brings us into the fullness of everlasting life with Him. Earthly treasures will perish, but our treasure is in heaven. Christ is our hope. Eschatology substantially shapes this disagreement. If Christ returns before the millennium, then the church does not finally subdue the rebellious world through historical progress before He comes. Paul likewise teaches that the rebellion precedes the day of the Lord (2 Thessalonians 2:3). Final public vindication arrives with the returning King and the resurrection of His people. But if Christ returns only after a prolonged era of widespread Christian ascendancy, then the statement “we lose down here” will naturally sound contrary to that expectation. MacArthur could have stated the distinction more fully or qualified his wording more clearly, but he did not need to, because nothing he said was false.

English
0
0
1
41
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
@TonyaMichelle65 @farmingandJesus His ex-wife is the splitting image of feminist girl-boss who's preferred idol is her own happiness. That doesn't make him a good father, but their divorce isn't evidence that he's a bad one.
English
0
0
1
19
ABiblicalWorldview
ABiblicalWorldview@TonyaMichelle65·
@farmingandJesus So folks who defend him can miss me with the "he's such a good dad" routine. Good dads are good husbands FIRST.
English
3
0
5
141
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
I'm more than willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but be clear and don't be naive. There are people all over X right now using this same argument while calling dispensationalism heresy and those who believe lost. Furthermore, what extra-biblical texts, non-canonical writings, or alternative religious scripture did MacArthur rely on for his doctrinal position? There are some that have relied on Scofield and the like, but as someone who formerly believe dispensationalism based on the hermeneutic MacArthur used and not an extra-biblical source, I only heard about Scofield through dispensationalist who told me how wrong he was. In my experience, your take only applies to a segment of dispensationalism and it has nothing to do with MacArthur.
English
2
0
0
96
Sophisticated Fido.
Sophisticated Fido.@Christo44229571·
@MusingOnCoffee @TexasPreacher My comparison Is not sinful. Good grief The point that I am making is that each of these groups rely on faulty extra-biblical texts, non-canonical writings, or alternative religious scriptures that absolutely affects the essentials of faith.
English
1
0
0
101
Dr. God Abeg ooo
Dr. God Abeg ooo@josh_uglyasf·
She said she could beat him… she thought his exercising restraint was fear until they were both in the ring.
English
2.3K
6.6K
75K
4.3M
redeemmycountry
redeemmycountry@promuatn·
@TexasPreacher @MusingOnCoffee Growing up I had to accept that some were more special than me and if I didn’t uphold the law I would be left here to face my head being removed or eternal damnation. Puts a weird slant on my loving God. Then I read the Bible….
English
1
0
0
29
Musing On Coffee
Musing On Coffee@MusingOnCoffee·
@Christo44229571 @TexasPreacher They have a different hermeneutic that doesn't affect the essentials of the faith as with the Mormons, JWs, Catholics. There is an extreme difference. Your comparison is sinful.
English
2
0
0
94
Sophisticated Fido.
Sophisticated Fido.@Christo44229571·
@TexasPreacher @MusingOnCoffee Correct Pseudologos The Mormon relies on the book of Mormon. The Jehovah’s Witness relies on the New World translation. The rabbi relies on the Talmud . Catholicism relies on the Catechism . Most evangelicals rely on dispensationalism .
English
1
0
1
119
Finance Lady
Finance Lady@FinanceLady5·
@MusingOnCoffee @TexasPreacher BTW, we KNOW he noticed this because he was friends with Ken Gentry and RC Sproul - I find it hard to believe that they never tried to correct MacA. Jerusalem was surrounded by armies in 70AD. That was the AoD. Josephus describes exactly what Jesus said would happen.
English
1
0
0
20