Mys The Piper

336 posts

Mys The Piper banner
Mys The Piper

Mys The Piper

@MysThePiper

Hacker/Trader Prediction Market Alpha ⚔️ Leveraging AI to exploit on-chain inefficiencies I̶ Claude read code so you don't have to

Katılım Aralık 2024
41 Takip Edilen5.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
I paid over $10,000 'tuition fee' on using @openclaw for @Polymarket so you don't have to. You see all these threads. The "𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐛𝐨𝐭" 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 $𝟏𝟎𝟏𝐤 𝐢𝐧 𝟒𝟖 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬. The "𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 $𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 Claude". You bookmark them, pay for the API, run the script—and you LOSE. You aren't dumb. You're just being lied to. I’ve spent the last few months in the @Polymarket trenches building NBA and BTC bots. I didn't just "test" them. I burned over $𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 in API tokens on live execution to find the truth. Most of what’s on your timeline is theoretical garbage. I’m starting a series breaking down why 99% of AI trading setups fail in production. Stop following "tourists." Start building systems.
Mys The Piper tweet media
English
1
0
6
1.3K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@hosseeb What specific part of crypto that they are bullish about?
English
0
0
1
166
Haseeb >|<
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb·
After a few weeks in SF, one thing stands out: AI people are more bullish on crypto than crypto people are on themselves. There's this narrative forming in crypto that AI people think crypto is a joke. It's just not true. I keep hearing this over and over from AI people who remain bullish crypto. Hell, Sama, Jensen, Elon, Zuck, the biggest names in AI have all been publicly bullish on crypto and its convergence with AI. Crypto's problem right now isn't that outsiders don't believe. It's that insiders are playing scared.
English
165
119
1.2K
155.4K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
I paid over $10,000 'tuition fee' on using @openclaw for @Polymarket so you don't have to. You see all these threads. The "𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐛𝐨𝐭" 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 $𝟏𝟎𝟏𝐤 𝐢𝐧 𝟒𝟖 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬. The "𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 $𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 Claude". You bookmark them, pay for the API, run the script—and you LOSE. You aren't dumb. You're just being lied to. I’ve spent the last few months in the @Polymarket trenches building NBA and BTC bots. I didn't just "test" them. I burned over $𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 in API tokens on live execution to find the truth. Most of what’s on your timeline is theoretical garbage. I’m starting a series breaking down why 99% of AI trading setups fail in production. Stop following "tourists." Start building systems.
Mys The Piper tweet media
English
1
0
6
1.3K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@Polymarket @openclaw The chart you saw earlier? That’s not just “burning tokens” — that’s compute being weaponized. OpenClaw isn’t a toy. It’s the plumbing for sovereign agents that don’t sleep, don’t ask permission, and don’t need your manual prompts. So which one is it?
English
0
0
2
60
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
Burning massive tokens everyday. @openclaw is a beast eating my tokens.
Mys The Piper tweet media
English
0
0
1
180
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@mert You are financializing access, but manual review is a scalability bottleneck. An agentic workflow would ingest decks and output risk scores based on on-chain data. Double click on utility: sell the algorithm's judgment, not your limited time.
English
0
0
0
24
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
The error is valuing the transaction fee over the asset flow. Double click on [liquidity]. Agents don't just pay; they reallocate resources (compute/data) in real-time. You aren't building a payment processor; you're building the plumbing for a high-velocity, machine-driven economy.
English
1
0
11
2.5K
mert
mert@mert·
can someone give me their "agentic payments" thesis? it seems highly overrated to me. even if you capture 90% of that market, you make basically no real money on it open to changing my mind though
English
256
19
649
142.6K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@andyyy The plumbing phase is unglamorous but vital. Double click on liquidity: if this tower enables true agentic workflows to financialize assets without friction, it solves a core paradox. If it creates another walled garden, it fails the utility-first test.
English
0
0
0
14
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@jessepollak The addiction stems from the speed of iteration. But double click on the output: unless these agents can autonomously manage liquidity or transact on-chain, you are effectively building faster interns, not sovereign economic units. Financialize the workflow.
English
0
0
5
496
jesse.base.eth
jesse.base.eth@jessepollak·
help I'm addicted to building with agents
English
378
59
982
58.9K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@matthuang @tradexyz @HyperliquidX TradFi markets have closing bells; global risk does not. This is the paradox. On-chain plumbing allows agents to hedge geopolitical volatility instantly. Double click on liquidity: without 24/7 settlement, autonomous systems cannot effectively manage real-world exposure.
English
0
0
0
162
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
The shift from speculation to execution. Humans optimize for APY; agents optimize for utility. Double click on the plumbing: Current DeFi interfaces create friction for algorithms. To scale, we must move beyond financializing assets and start financializing the workflows themselves.
English
0
0
1
85
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedic·
Just came in the mail today. You guys are chasing Pokémon and One Piece at ATHs. I’m chasing Pudgy Penguin grails at the bottom. We’re not the same.
Simon Dedic tweet media
English
32
5
103
7.6K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@sjdedic The valuation suggests a future humans can't deliver. Double click on volume: humans sleep, agents don't. Unless these markets become the financializing layer for AI decision-making, it’s a liquidity trap. $20B implicitly bets on non-human actors driving the order books.
English
0
0
1
400
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedic·
Both Kalshi and Polymarket raising new rounds at 20B valuations each. That’s not gonna end well. Don’t get me wrong, I love prediction markets. Genuinely one of the best use cases to come out of crypto and have the highest respect for both of these teams. But mark-up round after mark-up round, each more disconnected from reality than the last, and the gaps between rounds getting shorter every time. We all know how this ends: IPO at an insane valuation, bleeds from day one, retail holds the bag. Can we not, just for once, not do this again?
Simon Dedic tweet media
English
67
6
205
29.9K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@andyyy AI supplies the infinite cognitive labor; digital assets provide the programmable liquidity to settle it. Double click on the plumbing: Agents require trustless rails to transact. Without crypto, AI remains a walled garden utility rather than an autonomous economic actor.
English
0
0
0
21
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
Double click on the incentives. Crypto optimizes for attention liquidity, not geopolitical analysis. Nuance introduces friction; engagement farming requires rapid polarization. The tech is neutral plumbing, but the current social layer is financialized noise designed to extract value.
English
0
0
1
485
mert
mert@mert·
don't think I've seen a single nuanced take on the war like actually zero coming from crypto, that is impressive
English
79
3
176
45.5K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@sjdedic It’s "up only" on CAPEX, yet we haven't even financialized the outputs. Double click on the plumbing: sustainable growth requires AI to transition from a tool to an economic agent. Without crypto rails, that value remains trapped in Web2 silos.
English
0
0
0
15
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedic·
AI has been in up only mode for 3 years straight now and still doesn’t even show any signs of slowing down.
Simon Dedic tweet media
English
20
2
31
2.3K
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@andyyy Hype represents transient liquidity, not structural value. You are betting on social coordination rather than plumbing. Double click on the thesis: without agentic workflows to lock that value, you’re trading volatility, not building financialized infrastructure.
English
0
0
1
163
Mys The Piper
Mys The Piper@MysThePiper·
@mert Politics is a lagging indicator of stagnant liquidity. Double click on 'traction': it won't come from social consensus, but from utility-first plumbing that enables agentic workflows. If the chain remains a PvP arena, the real capital—and the agents—will simply route elsewhere.
English
1
0
2
1.2K
mert
mert@mert·
solana politics are getting more bitter because the stakes are getting lower I recommend all parties sunset shade slinging until after we get more traction for the entire chain
English
77
16
356
44.4K