NGO Monitor

Watch the full interview: youtube.com/watch?v=2EcyIM…

“Kristof is now on the defensive because all of the indications show that much of this was orchestrated... by an organization which is known as a Hamas front.” NGO Monitor Pres @geraldngom discussed @NickKristof's reliance on Hamas-affiliated Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor in his @nytimes column. Interview with @ILTVNews 🔽

🔵Desde @ACOM_es agradecemos profundamente al Prof. Gerald Steinberg por sus 25 años de liderazgo excepcional al frente de @NGOmonitor. Le deseamos lo mejor en esta nueva etapa como Presidente Emérito. ¡Enhorabuena a @olga_deutsch por su nombramiento como nueva Presidenta! Hacemos votos por una continuada y fructífera colaboración entre ACOM y NGO Monitor. jewishinsider.com/2026/05/ngo-mo…

.@nypost: @GeraldNGOM, founder of NGO Monitor, urged readers not to believe “‘eyewitness testimony’ from Hamas terrorists,” calling the column “a mix of lies.”

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor publishes no donor information, budgets, or annual financial reports. Its current Board Chair is Richard Falk, known for promoting 9/11 conspiracy theories and comparing Israel to Nazi Germany. This is in addition to the group’s documented ties to Hamas, as detailed in our research: ngo-monitor.org/ngos/euro-med-…

7/ Next problem: the article’s “evidence” for an Israeli policy of sexual torture leans heavily on Euro‑Med Human Rights Monitor, cited as if it were a neutral watchdog. In reality, Euro‑Med’s leadership has documented links to Hamas and a long record of extreme, unverified accusations against Israel. In June 2024 it even claimed Israel “trains dogs to rape prisoners” – the same grotesque libel echoed in Kristof’s piece. There is not a shred of credible evidence whatsoever for any systematic program of “trained rape dogs,” and, based on canine biology and behaviour, the scenario described is inherently implausible as a repeatable, controlled practice. This is not a neutral fact‑finding body. It’s an ideological advocacy group whose narratives the NYT has simply laundered into print.

1/ The @nytimes just published one of the most serious sets of allegations imaginable against Israel – claims of systematic sexual violence, including a bizarre story about carrots and trained rape dogs. We checked the sources. What we found is journalistic malpractice. 🧵

.@NickKristof begins his @nytimes anti-Israel hit piece by stating, “we should be able to unite in condemning rape.” He then goes on to rely extensively on Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, whose chairman Ramy Abdu dismisses overwhelming evidence of Hamas' sexual atrocities.

"NGO Monitor investigated ties between 'the worst and most cited NGO, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor,' and Hamas terrorists."

First in @jewishinsider: @GeraldNGOM will step down as NGO Monitor’s head in January, and will pass the torch to Olga Deutsch. More from @TZieve here: jewishinsider.com/2026/05/ngo-mo…

See more in our research on Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor ngo-monitor.org/ngos/euro-med-…

.@pressfreedom, which @NickKristof cites and refers to as “a respected American organization,” has a history of laundering terrorists as “journalists” and being forced to remove neutralized terrorists from its list of journalists killed in Gaza. >> x.com/Aizenberg55/st…

“A principal NGO quoted in Mr. Kristof's piece is Euro-Med Monitor… its leaders Ramy Abdu and Mazen Kahel have been repeatedly found to have links to Hamas.” 🇮🇱 Ambassador @yechielleiter shares a photo we found of founder and chairman of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor Ramy Abdu posing next to senior Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh. 🧵>>

‼️ NGO Monitor research was cited in the recent @Europarl_EN budget resolution. EU Lawmakers directly referenced our December 2025 report exposing Hamas’ control over humanitarian operations in Gaza. Building on these findings, the resolution urges the European Commission to investigate infiltration in EU-funded projects and to suspend or recover funding where breaches are confirmed.

A organização Médicos Sem Fronteiras (MSF) abandonou a neutralidade e a imparcialidade em sua cobertura da guerra na Faixa de Gaza, favorecendo os números e as narrativas do Hamas em relação à Israel e minimizando as ações do grupo terrorista. A conclusão é de relatório da NGO Monitor, que afirma que a MSF já não é uma organização humanitária confiável. “A MSF não é mais neutra: sua linguagem humanitária agora serve à uma causa política”, afirma o ex-secretário-geral da MSF Internacional, Alain Destexhe. Segundo o relatório, mais de 40% das declarações de funcionários e figuras importantes elogiavam o grupo terrorista e o massacre de israelenses em 7 de outubro de 2023. Alguns inclusive se vangloriavam de participação na construção de túneis e na produção de armas. Via: The Jerusalem Post

"NGO Monitor reported that Refugees International has a history of anti-Israel statements, having previously called for an arms embargo on Israel, denying Israel the right to self-defense, and claiming famine was imminent in Gaza." honestreporting.ca/petitions/cbc-… @HonestRepCanada

Our research: ngo-monitor.org/ngos/defence_f… ngo-monitor.org/palestinian-mi…

Regarding its April 7 closure, @nshavelson1 notes that “DCIP’s dishonesty and ties to terrorism eventually caught up with it.” Far from “defending children,” DCI-P turned a blind eye to the reality of child indoctrination by terror groups, described as “one of the most prominent affronts to the security of youths in the Palestinian territories.”>>

While @DAWN_Journal whitewashes Defense for Children - Palestine (DCI-P), a new op-ed by NGO Monitor’s @nshavelson1 exposes the lie: the terror-linked NGO was running cover for its anti-Israel political warfare under the guise of “defending children.” 🧵>>