NGO Monitor

The current controversy reinforces what our research documents: @AmnestyUK is not a neutral human-rights authority, but an active political participant whose charitable privileges, activist infrastructure and lawfare demand greater scrutiny by UK authorities. Read ngo-monitor.org/reports/uk-pro…

@AmnestyUK’s record on antisemitism reflects selective standards: it defended a coordinator who shared Nazi/Holocaust comparisons as a “highly principled human rights activist,” while its 2015 AGM rejected proposals to campaign against and monitor antisemitism in the UK. >>

.@jk_rowling says @AmnestyUK has become a “self-appointed, vainglorious policeman of wrongthink” and “what it was created to fight.” 🧵The fallout over Amnesty’s “anti-rights” report echoes our longstanding warning: the “halo effect” allows ideological campaigning to escape scrutiny. Our new report documents how that problem has manifest since Oct7. >>

The result: “Academic journals, professional associations, and humanitarian organizations risk becoming seen by serious medical professionals as simply another form of mass manipulation.”

The real aim of @TheLancet’s piece appears to be Israel’s isolation and delegitimization, not medical ethics. @GeraldNGOM warns that as politics overtakes scientific institutions, doctors and researchers face “ideological and immoral litmus tests unrelated to medicine.” >>

By circulating a new anti-Israel petition, @TheLancet acts as “another front of Hamas’s war against the people and institutions of the Jewish state.” 🧵NGO Monitor Pres. @GeraldNGOM exposes how the 🇬🇧 medical journal became a mouthpiece for the pro-Hamas lobby. >>

The Woke journals problem is getting serious now. The Grievance Studies Affair has never been more relevant.

The findings point to failures in OCHA-oPt’s vetting, oversight, transparency, and risk management. Donors and UN bodies must demand an independent review and stronger counterterrorism due diligence to protect aid from manipulation and exploitation. ngo-monitor.org/reports/ocha-o…

PFLP-linked groups and representatives also participated in OCHA-led bodies that shape priorities, assessments, implementation, advocacy, and donor engagement. Examples include PNGO, Bisan Center, and UAWC. >>

.@dcexaminer reports on our findings: @UNOCHA relied on Hamas-controlled bodies in Gaza for beneficiary data, project approvals, and field operations. Terror-linked NGOs received funding and institutional roles. Washington committed $3.8B to OCHA-managed programs since Dec. 🧵