Niklas Gestlöf

@WhickTv @Awk20000 Well, for me. I was more confused as to why Hasan would use a shock collar in the first place. He'd know ppl wouldn't like that, and he's really afraid of public opinion. The only way it does makes sense is if he wanted a dog as a stream background. So this confirms my priosr.

@Awk20000 Yeah regardless of the collar being shocky or not...this is crazy. Sitting in the same spot for HOURS ON END? Why? This is just cruelty.

This unearthed clip of Hasan saying he trained Kaya to sit for “hours on hours on end” is going viral on LSF “She has a leash on right now on the elevated bed so she can’t like really get off of it..she now knows to sit in place for hours on hours on end”

@Disinfo_Tracker Two things. First: if putting a shock collar on your dog is fine. Why is Hasan lying through his teeth about it? If he lying about this, what else is he lying about? Second: Kaya never knows when it's going to happen. It comes as a shock and could easily make her yelp.

Ethan Klein bought the shock collar Hasan Piker is accused of using and tried it on himself. He immediately discovered the collar isn't designed to be painful and likely isn't what made Hasan's dog yelp. Hila tries to get Ethan to say it was painful, but he admits it wasn't.

@Waldo_the_doggo @hutchinson Don't you realize how stupid you sound? You should like it, it's a good thing. But it's also the Democrats fault!

@hutchinson He wouldn't be able to do this if they didnt shut down the govt. And besides your foolish partisan politics, govt jobs are a leech on everyone. This is something you should want. But since its trump, you automatically hate it. Your brain it broken.

“I am going to fire a bunch of federal workers, which is something I am choosing to do and something that has never happened during a government shutdown. But it’s the Democrats’ fault.” 🙃

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom I see, that's why you don't substantiate anything. You saw it for yourself. The fact that you were so sure and backed away from every claim you made just meant they were so solid that you never had a need to even adress any claims in the first place. Stay healthy, have doubts.

@NGestlof @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom Because unlike you, I can see for myself, and don't need to constantly validate my faith for a non theistic religion known as the Democratic Party.

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom Why do you not feel shame by being brazenly incorrect? Is that a being raised by irresponsible parents thing? Did your parents not care about you?

@NGestlof @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom No, the majority of republicans did not. Thankfully the neocons are a minority.

@Kaizerrev Now if Dems get a supermajority (unlikely). You would probably see some shit for the people high up in the administration who broke the laws of the constitution.

@Kaizerrev Oh please. They said the same thing about Joe Biden. That he would hunt down everyday "normal" Trump supporters. It's not gonna happen in 2029 either. Biden made every effort to try and include Republicans. His legislative agenda was the most bipartisan in decades.

Nick Fuentes explains why he will move to another country if the Democrat gets into office in 2029. "Whoever comes into power from the Left is going to want Blood."

@theserfstv I don't know if he's using a shock collar. I don't think the one clip is enough evidence to say anything conclusively. However, him holding up a collar and describing the functions proves nothing. For that, he could show the amazon receipt and go through the function list.

I think people really need to start unpacking how parasocial relationships can work in both directions. There was an entire 24 hour cycle where people were openly calling him a dog torturer and the evidence was that there's probably a secret electrocution button off screen

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom I believe over 80 senators either voted to convict or said he was guilty and should be impeached. But so many Republicans were too cowardly to cast that vote. Knowing it would hurt their re-election chances if they did.

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom They said that they didn't want to convict him as he was already out of office and dome version of. "It would be bad for the country." "He's already out of office, so a conviction wouldn't do anything." "I don't think it's legal to impeach a non-sitting president."

@EndWokeness We'll see in 2028. Feels like an above 10% chance to me!

1 year ago, Oprah declared women will lose their right to vote if Trump wins. Update?

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom Congress does not convict. They impeach. Now, most republicans who didn't vote to impeach stated why they made that choice. What do you think that reason was?

@NGestlof @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom I'm not the one that needs convincing, it was congress. And they weren't convinced enough to convict.

@grok @MichelleBrodeu2 @Cernovich Okay, not sure what's different from what I said but sure. Regarding the solicitation of the 14yo. Is there more evidence it happened or it didn't. Regardless of the connection to the contested mall ban.

Your summary is mostly accurate based on trial evidence: conflicting testimonies describe confrontations over Moore approaching teens, but no undisputed "official ban." The ad was ruled misleading for tying this to a specific sexual solicitation of a 14-year-old at the mall, when allegations pointed to a pattern elsewhere. Correction: Appeal argued March 2025 (not October); no ruling yet.

Republicans CUT AND RAN from Roy Moore based on FALSE ALLEGATIONS. And lost a Senate seat that the country couldn’t afford to lose. Meanwhile Democrats are unanimously standing in support of a would-be child killer. Lesson in there.

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom What evidence would convince you?

@NGestlof @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom Is the evidence in the room with you right now?

@grok @MichelleBrodeu2 @Cernovich So, there's evidence he approached teenage girls to the point where it became a problem big enough that mall security confronted him, but no official ban. It wasn't connected to a specific encounter as suggested in the ad, rather a pattern of behavior. Correct any misstakes.

Court documents from the district trial (e.g., March 2025 ruling) show conflicting testimonies: Security officer J.D. Thomas claimed he warned Moore of a ban due to complaints about approaching teens, mentioning "sex" once. Moore and witnesses like Wendy Miller and mall employees denied any ban or solicitation. The jury found the ad's claim false, awarding Moore $8.2M for defamation. Appeal argued March 2025; no ruling yet.

@Master_Chen98 @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom Clearly, you don't care about the evidence in the first place, so... Perhaps facts or reality just isn't your thing. But hey, you can stay delusional if you want to.

@NGestlof @johnhawkinsrwn @GavinNewsom The charges fell through even when he wasn't president for that term. Sorry not sorry, you people failed at preventing from being reelected. The people couldn't care less about this kangaroo court, and saw right through your shit party's lies.

@grok @MichelleBrodeu2 @Cernovich Well, before you said evidence pointed to the fact that there was a ban. Now you seem to imply there wasn't one. Which is it? Please go by official court documents primarily.

Accounts from former mall employees and locals allege Moore was asked to stay away in the early 1980s for repeatedly approaching and harassing teenage girls, such as asking for dates or phone numbers, making them uncomfortable. Examples include Becky Gray complaining to her manager about persistent advances. However, Moore and witnesses like former mall manager Barnes Boyle deny any ban occurred. The defamation ruling focused on the ad falsely linking this to a specific sexual solicitation claim at the mall. Appeal argued March 2025; no ruling yet.

@grok @MichelleBrodeu2 @Cernovich Why was he asked to avoid approaching teens during school hours, then? It's not a normal thing to be asked to stop after all. What's the reason they wanted him to stop if not to stop inappropriate behavior?

The jury determined the ad was misleading because it falsely implied Moore's mall "ban" stemmed from sexually soliciting a 14-year-old girl there, when evidence showed he was asked to avoid school hours for approaching shopping teens generally—no proven sexual misconduct or direct link to the accuser's off-site claim. The district judge upheld this verdict, finding sufficient proof of falsity and actual malice under defamation standards for a public figure. The 11th Circuit appeal, argued today, may revisit but hasn't ruled yet.