💖💛💙North

@Lesibby_theGoob @MemesToFeel Honestly I should probably start doing the same thing. It’d be nice to purge my timelines of bigotry, I just assumed it’d be an impossible task, but I’m seeing more and more people have success with it. lol

@MemesToFeel Yknow what pisses me off? When I see a trans post, see that there’s comments, open it, and see nothing because I’ve been blocking transphobic accounts all day long. It won’t happen in my lifetime, but thank god that transphobia will inevitably die off. My grandkids will be safe🩷

@AdversAerialOne @Lesibby_theGoob @MemesToFeel Look all I’m sayin…. Is dat times was better when we had fewer teeth, dint read… and threw woman doctors into a big river. Thank you for defending the glorious past, Gobless

@AdversAerialOne @Lesibby_theGoob @MemesToFeel But that’s not the point!!! God said it best: “Just go chase out anyone who’s different, I want you to bully mentally ill people, and if someone is happy and different that’s even worse” -Jesus Christ Btw… thank you to witch hunter General jebadia for readin me that.

@JThomasB79 @NathanielSami Basically all you end up doing is being a little bit rude/linguistically inefficient while having to confront the exact same scientific data. lol

@JThomasB79 @NathanielSami According to your definition yes. This changes nothing about the clinical data indicating trans-gender men are better off receiving gender affirming care, among other forms of healthcare. Sometimes this means pregnancy care. So…. I don’t really get what this accomplishes.

The Democrats CHSOSE her to represent their side! What a JOKE.!!!

@RichardB680456 @NathanielSami There’s also the classic: “Niles…. Where is my penis? God damn you I never asked for this!!!!”

@RichardB680456 @NathanielSami You see… I’m torn Cause there’s a lot of funny jokes here: 1: that feels like a personal question… I don’t think it’s any of your business whether or not I feel biology 2: I probably feel biology more than you, just ask your mom/dad 3: I do pet a lot of cats….. 4: “yes…”

@PelziDragonNSFW I mean it takes a bunch of buttons, medicine, persistence, money, and time, But it is technically possible to achieve. lol

Im pretty confident / happy being a dude, but if I could press a button and instantly look like her I would do it ngl.

@leafadila Enter :3

morning ♥

@JFreedo41102272 @Hunter_Eagleman Ntm how weird it is to just go to a strangers house, and then try to pressure them into a political debate… Like I genuinely don’t understand what he was hoping to gain from this interaction. No serious person is gonna be like “hell yeah brother! Go be slightly annoying!” lol

@JFreedo41102272 @Hunter_Eagleman I’m no lawyer, so I’m not gonna make any kind of legal argument here, but im pretty sure the property owner shouldn’t have to say “get the fuck off my porch” 6 consecutive times before he cuts his losses and leaves. lol Even if this is 100% legal harassment, it’s still shitty.

😂🤣💀

@SaoriFur How much does one of these typically cost?

Look at how soft this is… 🐯 It’s like a real plush toy. Full one-piece plush suit Detachable head (zip system) Fits up to around 180cm You can wear it like a giant plush 🧸 DM me if you’re interested!

@TheChowDyeLo @amj966 @Vertex_am021 Interestingly… 1 man could have 2 wives if another has 0 according to that statement tho. lol It never specifies how many wives each man has, only that there’s 7 of each. (This notably doesn’t change the math tho)

@TheChowDyeLo @amj966 @Vertex_am021 “Each man and each wife” implies the following statement applies to all 7 men in addition to all 7 wives. There isn’t the same gramatical implication with “7 men have 7 wives”, so in that case there’s 7 wives divided among 7 men.

Only high IQs catch this pattern 🧠 logic puzzle that fools everyone

@amj966 @Vertex_am021 “Each man *and each* wife” implies the men and wives independently have 7 each. That’s 7+7 people total, 14 each having 7 kids. 14*7=98 total children Then we add the original count of 14…. 98+14= 112 total people.

@Vertex_am021 63 7 men + 7 wives = 14 persons Each couple has 7 children 7x7 =49 persons Total of 63 persons