NB

9.5K posts

NB banner
NB

NB

@NNBarnes

On, Wisconsin!

Katılım Nisan 2011
504 Takip Edilen49 Takipçiler
J
J@jwoodmwq·
@triviumcolombia it is pretty amazing to look back to the "clean" years of cycling and see how much struggle/pain there was at the finish line as compared to pogi/others in the last few years. theyre not even breathing.
English
1
0
3
907
 e-Tour de Dope ™
 e-Tour de Dope ™@triviumcolombia·
460 watts... Outrageous! And the absurd thing is that the Impaler still looks far from his limits. Del Toro has come close to Fishboy but despite exceeding the levels of inglorious dopers like Froome, Armstrong or Pantani, he can not be called 'el Matador' yet. (1/2)
🅰ntoine VAYER 📸🖋️@festinaboy

Ce soir et lundi on vous dira pourquoi grace à @lapreuvepar21 ce Tour est trop Pantaniesque pour etre honnete. On se moque de vous et les radars Huez et Orcieres ne sont meme pas faits @cyclismedopage @chronoswatts

English
3
9
59
20.1K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@conorsen Memphis and NO have a ton of structural socioeconomic/crime issues that I don't think Nashville ever shared (at least not near the same extent). In the sense that Memphis (and to some extent NO) are more comparable to places like Jackson and Little Rock, could've been foreseen.
English
1
0
9
460
Conor Sen
Conor Sen@conorsen·
Was it obvious in the late 2000s that Nashville would boom relative to say Memphis and New Orleans? Would be interested to read about what the local civic/economic development community did to foster this.
Aaron M. Renn 🇺🇸@aaron_renn

Worth comparing Vandy/Nashville to WashU/St. Louis. Peers in some way. The latter made some interesting moves but couldn't fully capitalized. Vandy has been more innovative and more able to execute. An example of how the South wins, and prestige compounding there.

English
34
4
89
43K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@tarapalmeri Relitigating the 2020 election, in 2026, after Trump coasted to victory in 2024. Yes, that's it. That's what the American people want!
English
0
0
3
200
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@AndyHermanNFL England went to the MLF prevent the win O, amazing.
English
0
0
0
137
Andy Herman
Andy Herman@AndyHermanNFL·
Argentina just doesn’t quit. They always find it. It’s unreal.
English
10
4
172
12.6K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@THEbadgermaniac @morepellent Maybe 80th to 90th if we’re talking multiple years consistently, but Brogdon managed that for about 2/3 of one NBA season on a bad team.
English
0
0
0
12
Badgermaniac
Badgermaniac@THEbadgermaniac·
@NNBarnes @morepellent Becoming a 20 PPG scorer while shooting 39% from 3, 87% from the line, and 46% overall while being a plus defender would be a GREAT outcome for Burries..probably in the 80th or 90th percentiles of possible outcomes.
English
2
0
0
48
Badgermaniac
Badgermaniac@THEbadgermaniac·
Have watched 1.5 of the Bucks summer league games to see the youngsters. Nate Ament does not look like an NBA player, let alone a late lottery pick. Burries will be fine, but lacks explosion, which isn't a deal breaker, but looks like a higher floor as opposed to higher ceiling.
English
11
2
25
6.6K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@THEbadgermaniac @morepellent I don’t know, he seems better at basically everything offensively than Brogdon was. I don’t think he’ll ever be as good of a defender, though.
English
1
0
0
35
Badgermaniac
Badgermaniac@THEbadgermaniac·
@NNBarnes @morepellent Brogdon comp was about his overall level of contribution, not specifically about their attributes as a player.
English
1
0
0
37
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@THEbadgermaniac @morepellent Burries tested better, is more explosive, bigger and longer, and has had a far better rookie summer league, all at a younger age than Jalen Brunson. Seems a little early to call Burries' ceiling "fine" or comp him to Brogdon. Far better comp is Murray, who's quite good...
English
2
0
0
104
Badgermaniac
Badgermaniac@THEbadgermaniac·
@morepellent I agree with assessment. He reminds me a bit of Malcolm Brogdon in this way...won't wow you with the highlight plays, but a nice rotational player.
English
2
0
0
109
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@notbobkoz I don’t blame him either, 18 year olds are dumb. My only point is that program doesn’t matter for one and done NBA level talent. Kentucky is a “better” program simply because it has more talented players. Although now that money is above the table instead of under, we’ll see.
English
0
0
0
18
not bob kozlowski
not bob kozlowski@notbobkoz·
@NNBarnes I’m not discounting that the Badgers have done that I’m saying that Kentucky as a program is a much better one I don’t blame the kid lol
English
1
0
0
27
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@notbobkoz Herro has more NBA talent (elite shooter) than Dekker ever did. No school would’ve changed that fact. What was Kaminsky as a recruit? Johnny Davis? Herro could’ve played at any high major for a year and been in the same exact place.
English
1
0
0
36
not bob kozlowski
not bob kozlowski@notbobkoz·
@NNBarnes Dekker was a top recruit in the nation Number 8 in his class per 247 Didn’t get drafted until his junior season Herro was 38 nationally. Got drafted after freshman year Kentucky as a program does matter dude.
English
1
0
0
42
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@notbobkoz Not the point, the elite Kentucky guys were always NBA level no matter where they went. Wisconsin took lower level recruits and got them plenty of exposure to get them drafted in lottery.
English
1
0
0
29
not bob kozlowski
not bob kozlowski@notbobkoz·
@NNBarnes None of those guys had/are having much nba success like I said Can’t even compare to Kentucky and their list of dudes
English
1
0
0
27
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@notbobkoz Wisconsin has made some marginal NBA guys a lot of money by making them lottery picks despite their talent and games not warranting it…Dekker, Kaminsky, Johnny Davis.
English
1
0
0
38
not bob kozlowski
not bob kozlowski@notbobkoz·
And guess what: he’s not wrong Wisconsin is not known for developing NBA talent. They’ve had a few draftees but not many. and the few who were drafted in the last 15 years didn’t exactly have nba success He made the right decision. It hurt you. Oh no. Move on.
English
5
0
18
2.2K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@DanClarkSports 162 games, and none of them should be fun.
English
0
0
0
6
Dan Clark
Dan Clark@DanClarkSports·
Boomer take alert, but I'll own it 💯... Jackson Chourio is not a left handed hitter. He never has been. Yet last night he batted left handed in the 9th. Playing MLB should never be trivial. Many guys bust their asses for years and never get the opportunity. Terrible look.
English
2.4K
40
1.7K
1.9M
NB retweetledi
Ben Dreyfuss
Ben Dreyfuss@bendreyfuss·
It was nice of America to let Belgium score those two goals so that Europe which is poor and insignificant on the global stage could feel better about themselves
English
24
25
422
19.2K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@LeonKrauze FIFA, quite literally, sold World Cups to Qatar and Russia. But Euros are big mad and draw the line now when FIFA correctly reverses a bad call? Nah, you'll all just complain and then keep watching like good little Euros who passively accept the world passing them by.
English
0
0
2
179
León Krauze
León Krauze@LeonKrauze·
With all due respect. What makes this case extraordinary is not that a red card was rescinded. It is that the rescission occurred amid public pressure and lobbying from the highest levels of political power in the host country of the tournament. The comparison isn't with a missed penalty call or an unfortunate refereeing decision. It's with one of the foundational principles of international sport: that political power should not intervene in the administration of competition. The "spirit of the game" argument isn't some quaint European attachment to suffering nobly. It is the recognition that sporting institutions derive their legitimacy from the perception that they operate independently of political influence. Once a government (particularly the government of the host nation and the world's most powerful country) appears capable of influencing disciplinary outcomes, the problem is not a “red card”. The problem is the integrity of the competition itself. And yes, FIFA's history is riddled with corruption, hypocrisy and political accommodation. But that is not an argument for accepting yet another breach of sporting independence. Quite the opposite!! It is precisely why even the appearance of political intervention should alarm anyone who cares about the credibility of international competition.
Ellen Carmichael@ellencarmichael

The most interesting part of the red card saga isn't the ruling. It's how differently Americans and Europeans process the idea that they might have been wronged. Europeans are fundamentally different from Americans in one particular way: they expect life to be aggravating and at times unfair. It's just a fact of moving through the world. I joke that in Europe, the customer is always wrong. You didn't read the fine print. The only pharmacy in town is closed every other Tuesday for three hours, and even if the times weren't posted, that's still your problem. Too bad if you want the bill, because the waiter's on his union-mandated half-hour smoke break, and you're just going to have to wait. To quote the great Mark Knopfler: sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. There's something freeing in that. Things are less in your control, so there's less angst in managing your expectations. In America, things couldn't be more different. We simply can't accept a wrong left unrighted. The flight attendant sneezed handing you a drink on your one-hour flight? 15,000 frequent flyer miles. Didn't like your appetizer? A replacement is on the way, and the whole course comes off the bill. There's a reason our interstates are lined with trial lawyer billboards. Europeans have turned complaining into a continental pastime with no expectation that the universe owes them a remedy for their grief. You gripe about the train being late, your friends nod solemnly and everyone goes back to their apéro. In America, we launch a full-blown investigation of the train system, sue the government (and its contractors) that allowed for the tardiness and hold a Congressional hearing on the state of national infrastructure. So to an objective observer, the red card shouldn't have happened, and VAR was a travesty. To Americans, our star player shouldn't be unfairly banned from a match we couldn't afford to lose for a card he so obviously didn't deserve. Who cares that FIFA used a little-used reversal to fix it. Who cares that other people are mad about it. We. Were. Wronged. It was unjust. It must be corrected. We would accept nothing less. Europeans waxing poetic about the sanctity of the game are, of course, talking about a governing body whose last tournament host was decided via confirmed cash bribes — one that imposed dress codes on women, shrugged off widespread allegations of modern slavery and reconfigured the entire tournament calendar to suit the host country. Which is exactly the point. If you've made peace with all of that, at least enough to watch the tournament four years later, a probationary suspension isn't actually a scandal. Maybe that's the real divide. Over millennia, Europeans have made peace with being the bug. Americans have never once considered it, and apparently, we're not about to start now.

English
78
233
1.1K
65.8K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@JulianRoepcke It's been over for you for an entire week.
English
0
0
1
5
Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦
Bei aller Liebe, aber diese WM ist doch zu Ende. In dem Moment, wo ein Staatschef auf den ausführenden Verband eines Turniers einwirkt, um rote Karten rückgängig zu machen, ist das Spiel doch einfach im Eimer. Trump zerstört alles, was er berührt …
Deutsch
2.2K
9.7K
54.6K
790.2K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@Ike_Saul I think what's "Wow" about all this is that the Dems made so many excuses for Mr. Nazi Tattoo that it even got to this point.
English
0
0
2
166
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@MaMoMVPY No. In Europe, people like you call it "respect for the rule of law" when in actuality it's just subservience to bureaucracy. Americans, on the other hand, loathe inane and illogical application of bureaucracy. Also why there was so much more pushback to covid regulations in US.
English
0
0
0
10
Lars Christensen
Lars Christensen@MaMoMVPY·
This is basically all wrong. In Europe there still is respect for the rule of law. In the US the rules will be changed by the King when it suits him. And Americans now more or less accept that this is ok.
Ellen Carmichael@ellencarmichael

The most interesting part of the red card saga isn't the ruling. It's how differently Americans and Europeans process the idea that they might have been wronged. Europeans are fundamentally different from Americans in one particular way: they expect life to be aggravating and at times unfair. It's just a fact of moving through the world. I joke that in Europe, the customer is always wrong. You didn't read the fine print. The only pharmacy in town is closed every other Tuesday for three hours, and even if the times weren't posted, that's still your problem. Too bad if you want the bill, because the waiter's on his union-mandated half-hour smoke break, and you're just going to have to wait. To quote the great Mark Knopfler: sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug. There's something freeing in that. Things are less in your control, so there's less angst in managing your expectations. In America, things couldn't be more different. We simply can't accept a wrong left unrighted. The flight attendant sneezed handing you a drink on your one-hour flight? 15,000 frequent flyer miles. Didn't like your appetizer? A replacement is on the way, and the whole course comes off the bill. There's a reason our interstates are lined with trial lawyer billboards. Europeans have turned complaining into a continental pastime with no expectation that the universe owes them a remedy for their grief. You gripe about the train being late, your friends nod solemnly and everyone goes back to their apéro. In America, we launch a full-blown investigation of the train system, sue the government (and its contractors) that allowed for the tardiness and hold a Congressional hearing on the state of national infrastructure. So to an objective observer, the red card shouldn't have happened, and VAR was a travesty. To Americans, our star player shouldn't be unfairly banned from a match we couldn't afford to lose for a card he so obviously didn't deserve. Who cares that FIFA used a little-used reversal to fix it. Who cares that other people are mad about it. We. Were. Wronged. It was unjust. It must be corrected. We would accept nothing less. Europeans waxing poetic about the sanctity of the game are, of course, talking about a governing body whose last tournament host was decided via confirmed cash bribes — one that imposed dress codes on women, shrugged off widespread allegations of modern slavery and reconfigured the entire tournament calendar to suit the host country. Which is exactly the point. If you've made peace with all of that, at least enough to watch the tournament four years later, a probationary suspension isn't actually a scandal. Maybe that's the real divide. Over millennia, Europeans have made peace with being the bug. Americans have never once considered it, and apparently, we're not about to start now.

English
1.1K
335
3.9K
157.3K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@JerryCap It's so dang embarrassing that FIFA ended up getting a decision correct. Almost unbearable. How will this immense weight of a decision being correctly corrected be carried?
English
0
0
0
95
Jerry Capital
Jerry Capital@JerryCap·
How is this not the most embarrassing thing possible as a US soccer fan/team member. The US is effectively eliminated themselves. If they win it's because they cheated. Pretty lame if youre on that team. He shouldnt play.
English
6
0
19
3K
NB
NB@NNBarnes·
@Dave6qb @AdamCrafton_ Cannot imagine being so far behind a country with a reality TV show host as president. Must be so bad you resort to being a crybaby about this.
English
1
0
0
31
Adam Crafton
Adam Crafton@AdamCrafton_·
Something FIFA appear to have completely underestimated when signing off Balogun decision is the current U.S. administration will always prioritize claiming credit over how something is seen optically, and if (in their eyes) it winds up buttoned-up Europeans, then even better.
English
57
285
3.3K
258.9K
Count Shmuckula
Count Shmuckula@shmuckula·
@NNBarnes @Microinteracti1 Wrong. They only lifted it because Trump threatened them. It’s pure cheating. I’m American and I’m humiliated by this. I was all excited and rooting for my team before today but now I hope we lose “bigly” today. Everything Trump touches is ruined. Period.
English
1
0
2
60
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
And so, inevitably, we arrive at the USAians. Their goalscorer got a red card. A ban. A game in the stands. The rules every nation on Earth accepts. You foul, you sit, you come back. Simple. Now, the Americans insist it was never a red card at all. And who knows, maybe it wasn’t. Even if the opponent’s leg looked like it might snap in half, referees get things wrong all the time. That is football. We love it and hate it for precisely this reason. But here’s the thing everyone else on the planet understands: a red card means a suspension even when the referee is wrong. Even when VAR is wrong. You can rage about the decision all you like, but the consequence stands. It always stands. That is the entire deal. Think of it this way. A defender hacks someone down in the box, the whistle goes, penalty. Maybe it was soft. Maybe it was a dive. Doesn’t matter. The other team takes the penalty. What does not happen, what has never happened in the history of the sport, is a president ringing FIFA afterwards and having the goal quietly removed because his team didn’t fancy the outcome. The decision on the pitch is the decision. Full stop. Except America’s response was to have the President of the United States, the actual man with the nuclear codes, telephone FIFA. FIFA, the most gloriously bent organisation in world sport, an outfit so crooked it makes a corkscrew look principled. And lo, the ban evaporated, the rulebook was rewritten, and Balogun trotted back onto the pitch as if nothing had happened. Belgium complained. Obviously. And the American answer? A lecture. “We don’t understand the whining. We Americans always want to beat the best team. That’s when victory feels earned. Anything less is loser mentality.” What a load of drivel. Belgium wants exactly the same thing. They want to beat the best American team. Nobody in Brussels is hiding under the bed because one striker is good at football. That was never the complaint. The complaint is that this is cheating. Plain, old-fashioned, unambiguous cheating. Getting your head of state to lean on a governing body until an ordinary suspension disappears. And everyone knows what we say about cheaters. Nothing they win counts. Ever again. Every goal from here carries an asterisk the size of Texas. If they lift the trophy, the entire planet will know how it was done, and nobody, not one single soul outside their own borders, will ever accept that this team won anything. What they’ll see instead is a squad of snivelling, cowardly, crying children who screamed until daddy fixed it. There is no honour in this. None. A tournament that began so well for them now ends the only way it can: as a permanent embarrassment for American football. Forever. And the tough-guy speech about always wanting to face the best? LOL. Embarrassing as well. If they win now, they’ll never admit how. And honestly, they’ll never need to. The whole world already knows.
Sky News@SkyNews

BREAKING: UEFA accuses FIFA of crossing 'red line' by suspending US striker's red card ban - after Trump lobbying #liveblog-body" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">news.sky.com/story/world-cu…

English
162
371
1.8K
101.3K