NOS Apps

@GlobalDiss The Dutch block shows even allies don’t trust data to be safe from foreign overreach. The real fix is architecture: if the tool never holds your data, no law can compel access. #Privacy isn’t just jurisdiction, it’s design

🚨🇳🇱 The Netherlands BLOCKED an American takeover of its Digital ID app over fears the US government could access citizens’ data through the CLOUD Act. Dutch officials said the privacy risk was simply TOO BIG. Even allies don’t trust Washington with their data anymore.

#Encryption is under attack. Governments push for access, Big Tech may comply. Who protects your data? @get2Cus: encrypted, secure, independent infrastructure. No backdoors. The future is private. 🔐 Article by @paulvieira Via @WSJ wsj.com/world/americas…

Your cloud. Your encryption. Your control. ☁️🔐 @get2cus wraps #Drive, #Dropbox & more in AES-256 #encryption you hold the keys to. No trust, just #security.

SIM-swapping turns your phone number into a weapon. The fix? Ditch the #SIM entirely. @get2cus gives you a 555 virtual number for SIM-less devices. No carrier to trick. No number to steal. 🔐 Read the @guardian angle: theguardian.com/money/2025/jun…

get2Cus #FaceCheck: The moment your receiver opens a file, or message, the front camera automatically captures a selfie. No buttons, no prompts, no facial recognition or biometric scanning, just a quick, timestamped photo as ultimate proof of who opened your file.

@SecurePrivacyAI When politicians, CEOs, and journalists use privacy tools, it's not a secret, it's a standard they deny others. Privacy isn't impossible; it's just inconvenient for profit models built on your exposure. Tools exist. Choose ones that protect, not exploit.

"You can't function in modern society without giving up privacy." Yet: - Politicians use encrypted phones. - Executives use privacy-first services. - Journalists use anonymous tools. Privacy isn't impossible. It's inconvenient for profit models built on your exposure.

@BigBrotherWatch Live facial recognition turns public spaces into lineups. Real security doesn't require identifying everyone, just verifying what's necessary without exposing who you are. Design that never collects identity can't be turned against you

👁️The Government is about to unleash the “largest ever” roll out of live facial recognition surveillance, putting our rights & freedoms at risk. Here are 5 reasons for YOU to join our fight to #StopFacialRecognition⤵️

Your phone comes with its emojis. @get2cus adds exclusive sets you won't find on #Android or #iOS extra expression that sits right alongside the ones you already use. Everything stays encrypted, nothing leaves your private chat. Express yourself. Securely. 🌌🔐

@Forbes reports that stablecoins are becoming "the go-to option for cross-border freelance payments." Why? Because traditional banks can take up to 15% in fees. @get2cus was built with a #Bitcoin wallet for exactly this reason. forbes.com/councils/forbe…

@GlobalDiss “Protecting children” shouldn’t mean building a surveillance state. Real safety is designing tools that verify without collecting identity, not banning access behind ID gates. Temporary bans have a habit of becoming permanent infrastructure. Choose solutions that protect everyone

🚨🇪🇺 Ursula wants to “temporarily” ban kids from social media and the EU could push new internet laws THIS SUMMER They always use “protecting children” as the excuse for MORE CONTROL. This is NOT about safety. It’s about censorship and surveillance.

Size limits. Expired links. Zero accountability. That can be one side of the story get2Cus gives you another: unlimited transfers, AES-256 encryption, and delivery receipts that show who opened it. Your files, finally treated seriously #get2Cus #FileSharing #FreelancerTools

@GlobalDiss When "protecting children" means surveilling everyone, it's a telescreen, not safety. Real #privacy tools prove you can secure without collecting data. Don't trade freedom for Orwell's warning

🚨🇪🇺 Stop the EU’s DIGITAL 1984. Charlie Weimers MEP: “Protecting children” and “fighting disinformation” are just excuses for mass surveillance and censorship Digital ID. Chat control. Speech policing Orwell warned us. EU is sleepwalking into tyranny

@nym Centralizing data for "safety" just builds a bigger target. The only unhackable vault is the one that never fills. Real protection doesn't hoard personal info, it designs systems that never collect what can be stolen. No honeypot, no breach

The Online Safety Act is creating a huge honeypot of data ready to be hacked.

@nytimes : Digital nomads priced out of returning to the U.S. The remote life needs security that moves with you. @get2Cus: encrypted messaging, 555 virtual numbers, FaceCheck. Zero-access. nytimes.com/2026/04/19/bus…

@NoToDigitalID Forcing ID to speak is silencing before you type. Free expression isn't just what you say, it's being able to say it without your identity demanded first. Real speech protection means tools that don't require a name, a scan, or permission. Anonymity isn't a loophole; it's a right

The European approach to "free speech" is to force every user of the internet to digitally identify themselves, then, prosecute them for the speech they choose to share. This approach is becoming the common across the Anglosphere too, and must be resisted.

@get2cus closes the accountability gap completely. No limits, no expiry roulette, full visibility.

Data-heavy look at the state of freelance work in 2026 by @Forbes: $24B market by 2033. Top earners $200K+. Profit for those treating freelance as a business, security, client control, keep more. @get2Cus built for that. forbes.com/sites/chelseat… #FreelanceTrends #get2Cus

@TutaPrivacy @AnnCavoukian If it collects personal data to verify age, it's not safety, it's surveillance. Real protection proves eligibility without exposing identity. Centralizing data creates a target; decentralized, zero-knowledge verification asks only what's necessary and stores nothing

Don’t call it age verification. Call it centralised personal data collection. And understand that it serves surveillance, not safety for children.

@krzysztofmulawa "Scanning for safety" still means someone can read your messages. Real privacy is binary: either the tool can't access your data, or it can. Once that capability exists, it's not just for "good" reasons, it's a backdoor waiting to be abused. Build tools that can't spy, period.

Inwigilacja w UE wkracza na nowy poziom. Bruksela forsuje przepisy, które pozwolą na stałe i automatyczne skanowanie prywatnych wiadomości, zdjęć i plików w komunikatorach, nawet tych z szyfrowaniem. Projekt Chat Control 2, bo o nim właśnie mowa, byłby najdalej idącą ingerencją w prywatność w historii UE. Cyfrowy nadzór, albo i nawet cyfrowy totalitaryzm - tak powinien nazywać się projekt, w którym urzędnik lub korporacja decyduje, co wolno nam pisać i jakie pliki możemy przesyłać. Prywatność to fundament wolności. Nie gódźmy się na ten cyfrowy dyktat.

The Number Exposure gap is real. 📵 get2Cus gives you a dedicated business line with zero #SIM and zero midnight spam. Separate work from life completely