Nicholas Paul Clayton

7.7K posts

Nicholas Paul Clayton

Nicholas Paul Clayton

@NPC1999143

Katılım Haziran 2024
195 Takip Edilen249 Takipçiler
Nicholas Paul Clayton retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, I'm replying to your post from yesterday: "Despite Democrats' partisan games, we're still going to get the entire federal government funded." Today, you sent the Senate home... not because of Democrats. Because of you. Here's what actually happened. On May 18, the DOJ announced an Anti-Weaponization Fund: $1.776 billion to compensate Americans harmed by Biden-era DOJ abuse. Your own caucus revolted. After a two-hour closed-door meeting, you departed for Memorial Day recess without a vote. ICE and CBP funding, punted to June 1. The "partisan games," it turns out, were yours. Your stated objections: no congressional authorization, no eligibility standards, no legal precedent, executive overreach. Fine. But let's talk about November 2025, when you tucked a provision into the government funding bill. The FBI had quietly seized phone records from eight Republican senators without notice, under an investigation codenamed "Arctic Frost." Your provision gave those senators, and only those senators, $500,000 per violation, retroactive to 2022. The House voted 426-0 to repeal it. The critics weren't opposed to compensating victims of DOJ abuse. They were opposed to senators compensating themselves while doing no other structural reforms. Lindsey Graham held the Senate hostage to preserve it. He delayed a spending deal in January 2026 to secure a floor vote on his revised version. Let's put the two columns next to each other: ➤ DOJ abused senators: $500K/violation payout, senators only, no hearings, no process, no eligibility debate, no floor vote on substance. ➤ DOJ abused Americans: "very legitimate questions," two-hour meeting, Senate goes home, reconciliation punted, June 1 deadline in jeopardy. You told Punchbowl News you "did not personally see a need for this fund." You personally saw a need for the fund when the targets were you. Go cry harder to your Punchbowl friends @JakeSherman and @AndrewDesiderio, because at this rate, they'll soon become the only people who are buying what you're selling.
DataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet media
English
457
4.7K
9.4K
72.2K
Bruce Fenton
Bruce Fenton@brucefenton·
Just unenrolled from the Republican Party. Enjoy the mid terms.
Bruce Fenton tweet media
English
1.5K
650
6.5K
265.3K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
Honestly, I think donations should only be accepted by the districts they reside in. Governed & verified properly, that would eliminate a ton of corruption and influence. The House races would be extermely hard to influence (from sheer quantity), but we'd need to watch the state wide senate races closley.
English
0
0
0
2
Regie
Regie@byRegie·
@NPC1999143 @DrunkRepub @elonmusk I feel you on the auto correct lol My point is the original post. OP made a point about California. Just pointing out that the other guy also had most money from California so it’s a non argument. Just wish people would follow their own rules.
English
1
0
0
6
Brian Basson
Brian Basson@BassonBrain·
That was @elonmusk's plan from day one, it's no secret... Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida and director of its market research program, the IPO Initiative, told Forbes he was concerned that @SpaceX would rely on @Starlink profits to send people to Mars at “enormous cost,” and that “enormous” subsidies would be required to maintain a Mars colony.
Brian Basson tweet media
English
61
35
543
194.2K
Lumen Rose
Lumen Rose@mamalechesocial·
Imagine, if you will…the year is 2028. The winning candidate? Janice D. Vance. The left celebrates his bodily autonomy. Same guy, same views.. genius 🤣🤣🤣
Lumen Rose tweet media
English
21
6
55
1.3K
Nicholas Paul Clayton retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did: 1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered: • Voice vote to avoid accountability • Empty chamber to avoid debate • Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny • Immediate recess to avoid questions You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning. The question you should answer: Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like. Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome. Own it.
English
5.4K
37.9K
81.4K
1.4M
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
@TIME This is the legacy of Karen Bass
Apple Lamps tweet mediaApple Lamps tweet mediaApple Lamps tweet media
English
2
15
277
1.6K
TIME
TIME@TIME·
The reality star's mayoral bid is running on outrage, celebrity and A.I. slop—and might just seal Karen Bass' re-election. time.com/article/2026/0…
English
473
25
144
74.9K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
Regie, what’s your point? Should all congressional campaign donations ONLY come from the direct they’re representing? I’d be fine with that. Until that happens, all of the US is impacted by dipshits like Masshole that have been there for 14 fucking years saying “based shit” but not actually doing anything except working against MAGA. I live in FL and donated to Ed 🤷‍♂️ I want him to vote with MAGA as it will impact me living in the US.
English
2
0
1
72
TMZ
TMZ@TMZ·
The Chicks' Natalie Maines slams President Trump with "fugly slut" jab 😭 See more: bit.ly/3PzgXUS
TMZ tweet media
English
360
32
174
53.6K
MAGS
MAGS@TAftermath2020·
Good luck winning without the libertarian vote MAGA
MAGS tweet media
English
242
25
381
9.3K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
Take an objective analysis of congressional voting records requires moving past superficial “liberty scores” BS, that ignore legislative substance, procedural context & strategic timing. Not every vote carries the same weight or consequence. On landmark legislation like the OBBB, a staple of President Trump’s agenda, the sequence & intent behind votes often determined outcomes far more than headline metrics reveal. Certain members, like Massie, Paul, McConnell & Cornyn, have refined a pattern of calculated positioning. They cast votes designed to influence passage or failure while retaining the flexibility to later claim fidelity to principle. This approach has long sustained uniparty continuity more effectively than outright resistance. Defenders who accept these scores without examining cause and effect inadvertently reinforce the very dynamics they purport to challenge. Trump is confronting this system directly through a coordinated series of actions across multiple fronts. Exposing these voting patterns & their real world effects is one element of that broader strategy. The full scope of these efforts (and their lasting impact) will become clear to everyone as we secure the midterms and elect a Congress committed to MAGA. Removing entrenched uniparty influences from Congress represents the essential surgery needed to restore genuine accountability & deliver on why the people elected Trump.
English
0
0
1
11
SaltyGoat
SaltyGoat@SaltyGoat17·
Who’s ready to see a 60 Republican seat - 40 Democrat seat Senate? Can y’all imagine how much we’ll accomplish?
English
2.7K
1.8K
13K
111K
MAGS
MAGS@TAftermath2020·
@RealAlexJones You are such a fool. If you took away mail ins, Gallrein still beat Massie. Your house of cards fell down the moment you brought up mail in ballots.
English
2
2
78
475
Joe Redden | The Older Millennial
I love seeing all these fantasy stories being spread about Massie now 😂 HE COULD’VE GOT RID OF THE DEBT! He’s been there for 14 years and ain’t done that. HE WAS GOING TO RELEASE ALL THE EPSTEIN NAMES! He said he was gonna say the names on the House floor more than a year ago and hasn’t done it. Etc… Just because your boy lost doesn’t mean you get to rewrite history.
English
30
53
578
9.1K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
@GBNT1952 @LaurenWitzkeDE The funny thing in her point, the people that saw the AI video thought it could be true 🤷‍♂️ maybe is Massie spent time in KY, not grandstanding, his constituents would have known. What a retarded position to take 😂😂
English
0
0
1
18
Green Beret Nap Time
Green Beret Nap Time@GBNT1952·
@LaurenWitzkeDE You are a lying crone. The total spend was a bit over $30 million. Almost $14 million of that was from Massie’s side, from PACs and donors outside of Kentucky. Stop lying all day long.
English
14
35
666
4.1K
Lauren Witzke
Lauren Witzke@LaurenWitzkeDE·
Zionists spent over $30 Million blasting a fake IO video of Massie having a threesome with the AOC and Ilhan Omar into every living room in his district in Kentucky but oh yeah for sure Massie lost because he “wasn’t a team player” get a life
English
90
25
173
7.1K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
I think with Cornyn being unseated and with this past week, he’ll have to cry uncle. Trump is surgically destroying the uniparty…once one of them defects, the whole rebuilding cycle will occur. Trump still has the non passage of the Save act to play socially to boost turnout in Nov., but let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.
English
1
0
1
132
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
A white liberal female will let a black man sleep with her as long as he wears a dress and a wig and calls himself a lesbian. These people are loons 😭
English
7
16
315
5K
Nicholas Paul Clayton
Nicholas Paul Clayton@NPC1999143·
@C_3C_3 Jordan finds a lot of shit and talks on shows and posts here...great. Let's see action out of Ole Jim 🤷🏻‍♂️
English
0
0
0
12