@mamacita4life2@RockyAtotheK You guys are fucking retards if the USA invades iran they will have massive amounts of casualties and have below a 10% chance of even succeeding, look up how long iran has been preparing for this, how many soldiers they have, the terrain our troops would be fighting in, nd drones
Wow… what a chessboard this could be ♟️
What if this is all strategic?
What if Trump is dismantling the old system piece by piece… forcing a reset?
Closing the Strait of Hormuz would shake the world’s oil supply to its core 🌍
And suddenly… dependence shifts.
Back to American energy.
Back to American manufacturing.
Back to self-reliance.
While the rest of the world scrambles through the chaos, the U.S. fortifies, stabilizes, and stands on its own foundation 🇺🇸
It sounds wild… but also strangely calculated.
If this is the plan, it’s not checkers. It’s high-stakes, endgame chess.
I hope there’s truth to it::
@crypto_andream@Cointelegraph@glassnode And now you blocked me for making you realize youre a retard😭😭 and responding to my reply before to make it look like you actually did something? All i was saying is the last 3 or next 3 escrows arent a surprise as you insisted in your dumbass post😭
@crypto_andream@Cointelegraph@glassnode Youre a retard, it takes 5 secs to look up the scheduled escrow releases and that theyve always been the same. Please do humanity a favor and delete your X account.
For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years.
The mission of SpaceX remains the same: extend consciousness and life as we know it to the stars.
It is only possible to travel to Mars when the planets align every 26 months (six month trip time), whereas we can launch to the Moon every 10 days (2 day trip time). This means we can iterate much faster to complete a Moon city than a Mars city.
That said, SpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about 5 to 7 years, but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster.
🇺🇸THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES NAMES #XRP AS AMERICA’S FIRST CRYPTO STRATEGIC RESERVE CURRENCY!
🔥THE MASSIVE WEALTH SHIFT INTO TOKENIZATION HAS BEGUN! TRILLIONS ARE POSITIONING TO POUR INTO THE XRP LEDGER AS RWA ASSETS OPEN UP A MULTI-TRILLION-DOLLAR MARKET!
IN 24 HOURS REAL TOKEN WILL BE LISTED ON A CENTRALIZED EXCHANGE LISTING! 🌍 DYOR/NFA
👉 BUY REAL TOKEN NOW:
xmagnetic.org/dex/REAL+rKVyX…
BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just reposted on 𝕏 to his 229 Million followers supporting Congress passing
- Voter ID
- Paper Ballots
- Same Day Voting
- Proof of citizenship
THIS NEEDS TO BE OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY
TIME TO GET LOUD MAGA
In 60 minutes $WLFI is going live.
I have absolutely 0 paid affiliation as always, my private opinion is this opens the gates for a crypto alternative that can one day rival the fed.
And that is the long and short of my interest in this.
Are you watching closely?
coinmarketcap.com/currencies/wor…
there are no partnerships, they told the SEC themselves that banks don't use their products
partnerships they did have pulled out
you can also give an LLM a list of the partnerships and ask it to check using verified sources and nothing much will come up, I gave it a list of about 40 and this is what it told me
the tech is outdated, there's no need for a bridge currency any more (words of the ripple president), XRP is only a gas token on XRPL now which is ranked 48th for total value locked in, it has no smart contracts and does about 200k total volume on chain on 3 of the 4 dapps
Plus why would they pick to use XRPL which is completely centralized with 35-40 validators compared to something like ethereum which has 400k. Most of these institutions will run their own chains like JP Morgan with Kinexys where they can control the security, not XRPL where ripple still owns 50% of the circulating supply
Why do you think they pivoted to a stablecoin? Most of RLUSD isn't even on XRPL it all lives on eth.
If you need sources for any of the stuff I said lmk, I can provide them. The same can't be said for the usage/adoption of Ripple
I know people are VERY opinionated about this but I’ve been following XRP since 2014 and I still have not found the answers to these questions. Genuinely looking for thoughtful responses:
- Ripple has 300+ bank partnerships, but after 13 years, shouldn't there be billions in daily on-chain volume?
- If XRP is volatile, why use it over stablecoins for transfers?
- If volatility is not an issue because it’s a bridge currency, what is the incentive to hold it?
- Are bridge currencies still necessary when stablecoins will cover most pairs in the future?
- Why would giants like BlackRock use XRPL for tokenization instead of building their own blockchain? (Robinhood uses Arbitrum and plans their own)
- Geopolitical risk. Why would foreign countries trust a US based private company payment network?
This does not mean FedWire funds as transitioned to ISO 20022 yet, it’s simply a status update on the health of the services.
This is a real-time status view used by financial institutions to monitor the operational health of U.S. payment infrastructure. Its importance is heightened as we approach the July 14, 2025 ISO 20022 Fedwire migration, because even minor disruptions can have cascading effects on settlement, liquidity, and compliance triggers across the banking system.
@johnjames1131@timguyHQ@WhaleInsider Because they dont understand true utility and mistakenly believe bitcoin is going to be used worldwide for payments