Dogs Nads

20.3K posts

Dogs Nads

Dogs Nads

@NadsDogs

Katılım Şubat 2019
194 Takip Edilen273 Takipçiler
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@SavonAnkka @TBrit90 But loaded... They've got to have issues with munitions availability soon as well...presumably the US will do the usual restock..
English
1
0
0
100
SavonAnkka
SavonAnkka@SavonAnkka·
@TBrit90 Tremendous amount of flight hours, but not all flight hours are equal. I imagine a lot of those being basically ferry flights from Israel to Iran without too much hard maneuvering
English
2
0
6
495
Britsky
Britsky@TBrit90·
The Israeli airforce is gonna be tired after this war.
Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian@manniefabian

The Israeli Air Force has dropped over 12,000 bombs in Iran since the start of the war, in over 8,500 separate strikes on Iranian regime targets, the military says. A senior IAF official says that "in 18 days, we flew as much as we would in a year." Of the 12,000 munitions, 3,600 alone were used in strikes in Tehran, according to the IDF. IAF fighter jets have carried out 5,700 separate sorties, including over 540 to central and western Iran and 50 deeper east in the country. Military officials say that the IAF is carrying out constant air operations over Iran to thwart ballistic missile fire on Israel, using new techniques that allow for longer operations without the need for refueling. In this formation, dubbed "metro sorties" by the IAF, drones and fighter jets loiter before carrying out strikes on ballistic missile launchers, Iranian soldiers, and other targets, based on "real-time information." When a new target is identified, IAF aircraft can be quickly dispatched to strike it. This was the case for the killing of Iran's intelligence minister, Esmaeil Khatib, in Tehran yesterday, according to the IDF. Officials say this effort relies on maintaining air superiority over Iran. The military assesses that its strikes have destroyed around 85% of Iran's air defense and detection systems. More than 300 targets relating to Iran's air defenses, including missile launchers and radars, have been struck, the IDF says. In terms of Iran's advanced air defense systems, the IAF assesses that it has destroyed 92% of them, with only a handful of such systems remaining, including some that are hidden and not in use. The IDF says it has destroyed around 80% of Iran's older air defense systems, along with 80% of its radars. Iran also has what the military describes as "decentralized" air defense systems, where missile launchers are connected to various optical systems, such as rudimentary cameras with artificial intelligence tracking software, to target Israeli aircraft. Some 75% of these systems have been destroyed, and military officials acknowledge they are much harder to locate than the advanced systems. Additionally, the IDF says it has destroyed or disabled around 60% of Iran's estimated 470 ballistic missile launchers. Some previous military estimates put this number at 70%. Around 200 of the launchers were destroyed in strikes, while another 80 are not considered to be operational after the IAF struck tunnel entrances to subterranean facilities where they are stored, according to the military. The IAF says it continues to hunt down the remaining roughly 200 launchers to reduce the missile fire on Israel. The military also assesses that Iran still has hundreds of ballistic missiles that can reach Israel. It has so far launched over 350 at Israel, with the rate of fire slowing to 10-20 missiles a day in the past week, with just one or two missiles at a time.

English
5
2
121
15.1K
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@ArmaJacked @SandyofCthulhu When the QE arrived she destroyed most of the forts...turned out well directed 15inch shells will do that...the Turkish short batteries were down to a tiny amount of ammo as well...
English
0
0
0
7
Jack Tribolet
Jack Tribolet@ArmaJacked·
@SandyofCthulhu A ship is a fool to fight a fort. The British used their worst ships and consistently overshot their targets. It wasnt until they incorporated aircraft for targeting they began to hit their mark. Most importantly, they squandered surprise enabling mass Turkish reinforcement.
English
1
0
1
231
Sandy Petersen 🪔
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu·
The British fleet could absolutely have forced the Dardanelles. They did lose ships - old ones. They didn’t need a powerful fleet in the Mediterranean where they reigned supreme. It would have been worth losing many more ships to force the straits and bombard Constantinople into a truce. The Sultan was already preparing to give in. Then the fleet turned tail. Because of the cowardice and fecklessness of the British Mediterranean admirals, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost at Gallipoli, Mesopotamia, and Sinai.
InfantryDort@infantrydort

On this day in 1915, Allied forces launched a naval assault on the Dardanelles. >3 battleships sunk in hours >Multiple others crippled >A narrow strait became a killing zone Sea power alone could not force a chokepoint. Confined waters and prepared defenses caused chaos.

English
23
7
390
32.2K
DisappointedIdealist
DisappointedIdealist@DisIdealist·
@Arcus_Gladius Why is the middle east of strategic importance the uk but not, say, Germany, France, Netherlands or any other country which doesn’t have a base in Cyprus?
English
3
0
7
627
DisappointedIdealist
DisappointedIdealist@DisIdealist·
The open and frank conversation needed is inside the UK. Why do we have these huge, expensive military bases in Cyprus? Why is the UK in the eastern med? It’s not 1925. We’re not an empire any more. We’ve no need to guard Suez. Why are we spending money to be there at all?
Lewis Goodall@lewis_goodall

Cyprus PM on future of British bases: “When this unfortunate situation in the Middle East is over, we need to have an open and frank conversation about the status and future of the British bases in Cyprus,”

English
13
35
245
15K
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@JonA2i @gregbagwell I don't doubt MICA figures, very surprised about Asraam...its got a larger rocket motor and uses the same seeker as 9X...
English
1
0
0
9
Aerospace Analysis
Aerospace Analysis@JonA2i·
@NadsDogs @gregbagwell No price given, but my man said ASRAAM was cheaper for Qatar than -9X and MUCH cheaper than Mica, whose IR variant is said to be 'eye wateringly expensive'...
English
1
0
1
29
Greg Bagwell
Greg Bagwell@gregbagwell·
Coming soon? 1/3 the cost of a Martlet and 1/10 the cost of an ASRAAM, APKWS could be the low cost anti-drone solution we have been waiting for…. (Image credit: Tech Digital Photography)
Greg Bagwell tweet mediaGreg Bagwell tweet media
English
21
35
411
29.9K
Alex Hollings
Alex Hollings@AlexHollings52·
This is very interesting stuff... Notable that the F-35 made it home. Most surface-to-air interceptors launched by long-range systems have massive warheads (~320 lbs). I don't think Fat Amy could eat one of those in stride — so what was the interceptor?
OSINTdefender@sentdefender

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has release a statement, accompanied by video footage, which claims to show the targeting of an American F-35A/B Lightning ll with a surface-to-air missile in the skies over Iran. This claim by the IRGC follows reports that a F-35 was damaged and forced to make an “emergency landing” at an air base in the Middle East due to hostile fire over Iran.

English
99
9
448
169.1K
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@JonA2i @gregbagwell There was something going on with both large orders, particularly as Thales had a separate contract to secure components/supply chain. Wouldn't shock me if some work on Starstreak, to update Starstreak 2 (to remove the obsolescence that we'd previously removed) was included.
English
1
0
0
10
Aerospace Analysis
Aerospace Analysis@JonA2i·
@NadsDogs @gregbagwell The Ukrainian figure was so much higher than that, and such an outlier, that I ignored it. £1.16 Bn for 5,000 missiles - eg £232K per round!
English
1
0
0
11
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@JonA2i @gregbagwell The Asraam price of £200,000 is one from years and years ago as well...I don't think they're cheaper than AIM-9X.
English
1
0
0
33
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@JonA2i @gregbagwell LMM... Original cost was £50m for 1,000 missiles + all the development and test, documentation etc etc. The figure of £51-79k was one I worked out elsewhere based on an order for Ukraine...but I believe it includes some of the new CLU as well...which are pricy...
English
1
0
0
14
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@JonA2i @gregbagwell I know where that figure came from....me. I now think that order included some other gear like CLU's...
English
2
0
0
76
Aerospace Analysis
Aerospace Analysis@JonA2i·
@NadsDogs @gregbagwell Martlet may have started out at £50K, but it's now estimated at £59-71k per round. $40K is £29,950 as of today's exchange rates. So APKWS is roughly half the cost of Martlet.
English
1
0
1
86
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@chrisschmitz type is cleared outside that by UK MoD and CAA. Thats RG.1 Protector...and it was only very recently cleared. UK was unable to use its own MQ-9 in the UK because of this. It's exceptionally unlikely that a US drone has been allowed...
English
1
0
0
29
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@chrisschmitz Slight problem with the Mildenhall markings... UK will not allow unmanned aircraft to operate in its airspace outside of a tiny number of areas (Salisbury Plain and some drone testing sites on coast)...unless they are specifically designed to do so and cleared by CAA...only 1...
English
1
0
0
132
Mark
Mark@Rubble2012·
@FennellJW This is a useful wake up call to Whitehall and Westminster
English
1
0
2
129
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@ChrisO_wiki Houthis (i.e. IRGC) have been using IR tracking for an age....sometimes with the jet powered loitering munitions, but sometimes with re-purposed IR homing AAM's launched from ground like AA-11's...
English
0
0
5
951
ChrisO_wiki
ChrisO_wiki@ChrisO_wiki·
Still to be confirmed, of course, but if this is verified it looks very much like a direct or near-direct hit on an F-35 using a guided missile. My bet would be that this was some kind of laser-guided munition, somewhat like the US APKWS. Stealth would provide no defence.
خبرگزاری فارس@FarsNews_Agency

🎥 لحظۀ هدف‌قرارگفتن جنگندهٔ F35 آمریکا توسط پدافند نیروی هوافضای سپاه

English
92
116
1.2K
141.6K
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@sigourneybeaver There are other options out there...but...there will always be something cheap on them if they're less than £700. Usually the screen... The Mac and Surface have excellent screens, reasonably tough and will fit in a bag really easily.
English
0
0
1
4
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@sigourneybeaver Genuinely the best choice is a Macbook...or failing that (if you're not into Apple) a Microsoft Surface Laptop. c£800-900, but both are bombproof, look good, with decent battery life and will last an entire degree with no issues. John Lewis or Costco best for price/warranty
English
1
0
1
74
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@TBrit90 @Saul_Sadka Apparently the first intercept attempt was Davids Sling that missed. The final ultra low level one was Tamir...
English
0
0
0
15
Saul Sadka
Saul Sadka@Saul_Sadka·
Israel's Iron Dome wasn't designed to intercept ballistic missiles arriving from outside the atmosphere. But its relatively cheap Tamir interceptors seem to have developed the ability to do exactly that, as increasing numbers of videos like this show.
English
21
121
1K
82.4K
Paul Fanning
Paul Fanning@trivet1806·
@AndyAitcheson Putting aside the 'West Berlin' sign, the crappy uniform and the fact that he appears to be carrying an M1 Carbine, I think my favourite detail is the guy giving no fucks and waving to the camera apparently from the other side of the border where there's zero barbed wire.
English
2
0
7
466
Dogs Nads
Dogs Nads@NadsDogs·
@areid602 @BenObeseJecty BAE themselves warned the Gov. Nothing wrong with the engines themselves...it was the US built intercooler who performance did not meet spec in real world conditions..closure of Pyestock test facility didn't help either... But...PIP is belt and braces, RR and RN have fixed them..
English
1
0
2
9
Allan Reid
Allan Reid@areid602·
@BenObeseJecty Some canny old Clyde shipbuilders have told me that the Government was warned about the risks with the powerplant selected.
English
1
0
0
64
Ben Obese-Jecty MP
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty·
What would leave a Type-45 destroyer as a “sitting duck” would be if it, for example, had engines that didn’t work. It was Geoff Hoon who in 2000 under the last Labour Government took the decision to equip them with the ill-fated WR21 engines. Labour then halved the number of ships from 12 to 6, so we had fewer ships, all with unreliable engines. The £160 million Power Improvement Project is still rectifying that decision today. HMS Duncan still hasn’t had her engines replaced. The HMS Dragon farrago can be traced all the way back to Hoon.
LBC@LBC

'This would double the risk to the West.' Defence Secretary under Tony Blair, Geoff Hoon, says that sending a British warship to the Strait of Hormuz would leave it as a 'sitting duck'.

English
45
52
301
35.1K