Nancy Dalva

This footage. My heart project.

@ianbremmer The mortification of America.

the chinese played ymca for trump

@sachabrady @MerriamWebster “Girls, said our seventh grade English teacher Miss Harris, “Remember there is a ***rat*** in the middle of ‘separate.’”

@MerriamWebster Separate v desperate. Only learned how which has the middle 'a' and which a middle 'e' by exaggerating their pronunciation.

What word is your spelling nemesis? This is a safe space.

@Martina variety.com/2020/voices/ne…

lol

@RonFilipkowski Isn't this the plot of Peter Pan? When the children in the film or play (and the audience) clap to save Tinkerbell?

Please clap.

She's the genius of the universe.

The 92nd street Y, to their eternal glory, has uploaded hundreds of recordings of speakers who have graced their stage. We are talking T.S. Eliot, William Carlos Williams, Edmund Wilson (!), Mary McCarthy, Irving Howe, and much more. Check it out here! 92ny.org/archives

Oh he is absolutely darling. You have multiplied the people who love him. He is tucked into many hearts now. And his mama holds him as she did before he was born, near her heart. This does not ease the pain of losing him, but it lessens the fear that you will forget him, that you will miss him less. Your old life will return, but you will walk through it with him. He is still your baby.

A few people have asked for my son’s name; it was John Charles — we called him J.C. — and we named him after his grandfathers.

My son died. I know he didn't contribute anything to mankind — he was only two months old — but I like to believe he was destined to do something good for humanity. It's been a while since his death, and I hate to dwell on it so publicly, but I wanted you to know him.

We want to look to tradition, with a bow to the Brits, because CORGIS, with this in mind: The cat at 10 Downing Street's official title is Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office. "Chief Corgi to the Campaign." Or, "Corgi in Residence." Simple, dignified, sadly does not mention his ears or his good cheer.

Need an official campaign title for Clyde Conway the Corgi Initial thoughts: Director of Canine Affairs Campaign Spokesdog Volunteer Coorginator Field and Ball-Chasing Director Pawlicy Analyst Suggestions welcome in the replies. Thx! 🙏🏼

Some of the artwork from the "Madeline" books really is stunning. Unfathomable to imagine it appearing in children's books today.

@stein_mark20322 @NBCOlympics or Petroushka.

@NBCOlympics ...the performance was like something out of the Firebird Suite by Stravinsky. Good.

This reminds me of interviewing the Wooster Group stalwart, playwright, scholar, and translator Paul Schmidt on live radio, when the then Lady President of UT, a dietician by training, was listening during her lunch hour. (On Tuesdays, it was me, bringing culture.) So I asked, "Tell me Paul Schmidt, what brings you to the University of Texas at Austin?" And he replied, "Well, Nancy, I just like to sit out by the pool, smell the flowers, and blow dope." It was the best segue of what would be my long career, as I replied, "Speaking of Baudelaire...."

@DAMendelsohnNYC Daniel, dear, I do confess this billet doux strives to express my deep delight in your endeavor-- Such wit! Such pith! Delicious pleasure!

Niobe, won't your quit your crying?! Yes, your fourteen kids are dying— If you'll be mine, you'll never blubber; I'll be sure to use a rubber! #classicalValentines #ValentinesDay #ValentinesDay2026

@RonFilipkowski "who's"

The US Ambassador to Poland is a disgrace. It is clear that the Trump admin is implementing a premeditated plan to alienate and infuriate all of our closest allies to destroy relationships that were built over many decades. Putin loves it all since it is his plan.

At the Kennedy Center....

This fall, I had the pleasure of re-reading Karl Ove Knausgaard’s work for the New York Times. I’m grateful for the assignment, the brilliant editing, and Knausgaard, for giving me so much to think about, as always: nytimes.com/article/karl-o…

The Essential Karl Ove Knausgaard nytimes.com/article/karl-o… My favorite writer on his favorite writer: Adam Dalva reads (all of) Knausgaard.

@dieworkwear Both of these threads are (It's a) wonderful (life), but it really helps with these clothes to also look like Jimmy Stewart. Or be him, really. Unless under those clothes is somebody we don't think of as "Jimmy Stewart," and it's all tailoring.

the clothes look better in motion, but you can't attach a video in the format i used above. so here is a clip in a separate tweet.

I can tell you what's stopping most men from dressing like this. Please click open this thread (into a new window) so that you can see the correct placement of my photos. This will help you understand my argument more clearly. We should first identify what we're looking at. This is James Stewart in the 1946 film It's a Wonderful Life, now beloved as a holiday classic, but during the immediate postwar years, it was eyed with suspicion. During the early days of the Cold War, the FBI thought this film was communist propaganda. After all, the film is about a kind-hearted man who sacrifices his own self-interest to help others. He starts an organization to help working-class families secure affordable housing and takes a stand against the villainous banker Mr. Potter. The FBI felt this was an attack on the upper classes, especially since two of the screenwriters were suspected of being communist sympathizers, so they referred the film to the House Un-American Activities Committee, although no action was ultimately taken. For the menswear-minded, the film will stand out especially. Despite portraying the humble George Bailey, James Stewart's wardrobe is remarkably good in this film. We see him in some things that today might be judged as strange — such as a peak-lapel single-breasted tweed suit with four (four!) patch pockets, including two at the breast — but for the most part, his clothes have aged very well. Meaning, you could take many of these clothes and wear them today (hence the original poster's question, "what's stopping you from doing so?"). The secret to this success is in the quality of the make and proportions. In the film, Stewart wears trousers that are high enough to cover his shirt when the coat is fastened. The coat bisects him halfway from the collar to the floor. The trousers are full enough to create a smooth silhouette between the bottom and top halves of his outfit. A sharp eye will also notice that the lapel has a very pleasing roll — evidence of hand pad stitching. And of course, the collar always hugs his neck. The overcoat, which sparked this discussion, is also very long (long enough to reach below his knees, which is what you want in blustery weather). Like the lapels on his suit jacket, the his overcoat lapels are neither overly skimpy nor overly wide — just classic enough so you can never peg the garment to a specific fashion trend or decade. Given what we know about how actors dressed for films during this era, along with what we can see in photos, we can reliably guess that these garments are both bespoke and hand-tailored. By bespoke, I mean the garments were made from scratch and perfected through three fittings. The advent of ready-to-wear manufacturing in the mid-19th century, along with the explosion of designer clothing and sportswear in the postwar period, effectively swept away our domestic bespoke tailoring trade. Instead, what's left across the country are primarily made-to-measure shops run by businesspeople, not tailors, who have relationships with overseas factories. This system can be fine, but it may not achieve some of the effects you see here. This is especially true if the shop has been influenced by fashion trends (which most have). Such shops produce shorter, tighter garments made from fine, silky materials that don't achieve this look. Thus, the simple answer to your question is: most men don't dress like this because they don't have access to bespoke tailors. However, some men have access to bespoke tailors. In the United States, such people tend to be concentrated in or around major cities, such as New York City or San Francisco. However, even in these areas, the number of bespoke tailors remains small. There are several reasons for this. First, skyrocketing rents make it very difficult for these businesses to survive. Most people have an upper limit for how much they're willing to pay for the outfit you see in the original image, and that limit is not $10,000. To get bespoke tailoring prices down, we must create affordable housing and commercial real estate. Second, even if you were to open a bespoke tailoring shop in the US, who would you hire? There aren't many skilled tailors in the US for various reasons. It takes a decade or more to train to be a bespoke tailor — and how would you even do so? Can you survive without health insurance for twenty years? Can you find enough customers to pay for astronomical rents? The US tends to celebrate wealthy entrepreneurs, not craftspeople, and the latter requires slow, steady concentration over decades, often living in poverty until you finally perfect your craft. To help create more craftspeople, we need universal healthcare, affordable housing, and a shift in American values (less worship of money). Thus, even if you're in NYC or San Francisco, the chances of you getting a bespoke garment from a domestically based tailor are slim. That's why most people who are into bespoke tailoring rely on the many international tailors who swing through major US cities three to four times a year to meet with clients. Such tailors typically hail from the UK, Italy, Japan, or South Korea. But here we land at yet another problem. During their last tour through the US, the managers behind the South Korean tailoring shop Assisi told me that customs and border agents hassled them, seizing some of their luggage. They consequently lost some of their swatch books, which were critical for their trunk shows. As directed by President Trump, border agents have been unusually harsh to travelers. This creates another barrier for US customers to dress like Jimmy Stewart above. Let us assume that you're able to see one of these tailors in NYC or San Francisco, and that they've somehow successfully navigated borders and customers without issue. And you're able to repeat this four times — initial meeting to be measured and place an order, then basted fitting, forward fitting, and final fitting. Let's assume there are no other issues, and the item can be shipped to you. Congrats, you've now been hit with a customs bill. Due to Trump's tariffs, a new tax is levied on incoming shipments (which vary depending on the country of origin). For most bespoke tailors, I've seen this range anywhere from 10% to 20% of the declared value (which can be a lot given the price of bespoke clothes!). If you order something made from cashmere or a cashmere blend, it can be as high as 50% (not an unusual fabric for an overcoat). This creates yet *another* barrier for men to dress like this. So, to answer the question of why men don't dress like this, a big reason is location. Most men don't live in a major US city. Second, the US doesn't have a culture or climate suitable for raising craftspeople — the worship of money, lack of universal healthcare, and skyrocketing rents (both commercial and residential) make it very difficult to become a bespoke tailor in the US. And if you use one of the international operations, you will have to pray that border agents do not hassle your tailor. And when your garment arrives, you will have to fork over more money to cover Trump's tariffs. The combination of all these effects makes dressing like this a dream for most men. This is assuming they can get past the cultural stigma of men being less masculine or heterosexual if they express an interest in clothes, which will undoubtedly come through if you dress like James Stewart in the 1940s. Breaking this barrier down requires us to expand our understanding of masculinity or to be less judgmental about gender norms.

@dieworkwear These are excellent photos.

for those who may be unfamiliar, this type of shirt is supposed to be worn with dress studs and some type of waist covering, such as a cummerbund or formal waistcoat (which is cut lower than a business vest). this way, your dress studs show but the bottom button does not.

DEI button

@skiistiredasf Alex Katz (after the artist) whose dogs for Paul Taylor's "Diggity" look like this, as does the artist himself.

give this dog a name;

@dieworkwear Sir Frederick Ashton's "Peter Rabbit." Someone on your Bluesky thinks this is a donkey, which would make it a very strange "Midsummer," which Ashton also choreographed. The donkey wears pointe shoes.

How to get this outfit. First, you will obviously need a chore coat. If you have money to splurge, I like the options pictured below. In order: — Bryceland's — Orslow (check Canoe Club) — Vintage 1960s Lee 81-LJ at The Major's Tailor If you're looking for something more affordable, check Vetra, Le Laboureur, Arpenteur, and Le Mont Saint Michel. Just don't go too slim — chore coats look best when they're loose and heavily broken in. Brut also recently opened a store in NYC. They will likely have something cool in this sort of design. Alternatively, you can find a vintage French chore coat, which are available eBay and Etsy, as well as curated vintage shops such as Wooden Sleepers (NY), Raggedy Threads (NY), and Butterworth's Vintage Company (UK). Again, don't fuss too much about the sizing — these look best when they fit loose and not too perfect. Another alternative: the barn coat, which is a close cousin. I was recently admiring this one (pic 4) from the South Korean brand Man on the Boon (pic by Unipair Managing Director Jaeyoung Kang; IG jaeyoungkang). In the US, you can more easily get a hold of something from LL Bean or J. Crew (search vintage). Again, don't go too slim. It's nice to be able to layer it over other stuff, like you see in the fourth pic. Finally, you will need a banana. I like Kapital, but you can also get a basic bandana for like $5 from a vintage shop. Todd Snyder also makes nice bandanas from finer materials like thinly spun wools.

this is what some of you look like in your chore coats