Nanna Lauritz Schönhage

337 posts

Nanna Lauritz Schönhage banner
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage

Nanna Lauritz Schönhage

@NannaLauritz

PolSci Associate Professor @NTNU. Affiliated with @EXCInequality at @UniKonstanz & @VUBrussel. Voter accountability, partisan biases and information.

Trondheim, Norway Katılım Kasım 2016
297 Takip Edilen190 Takipçiler
Roberto Iacono
Roberto Iacono@Roberto__Iacono·
@NannaLauritz It depends on the use and type of ski trips you plan to do. On average, I would recommend a pair alpine skis and a pair mountain skis (fjellski).
English
1
0
1
28
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage@NannaLauritz·
Now that I'm in Norway, I rely on my colleagues both for their expertise in academic topics, and also their expertise in skiing. Because what kind of skiis should I get?
English
1
0
4
227
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage retweetledi
Oda Nedregård
Oda Nedregård@NedregardOda·
Very excited to see my paper with @JFiva out in QJPS! In the paper, we study the importance of political parties in disciplining and motivating their elected officials. nowpublishers.com/article/Detail…
English
6
9
62
9.6K
Ronja Sczepanski
Ronja Sczepanski@RonjaSczepanski·
I still have much trouble believing it but today I start at @sciencespo @SciencesPo_CEE as an Assistant Professor, continuing my work on the EU. I am very humbled by and excited about this opportunity. I am looking forward to work together with amazing colleagues and students
Ronja Sczepanski tweet mediaRonja Sczepanski tweet media
English
51
6
260
22.6K
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage retweetledi
Lena Schaffer
Lena Schaffer@schaffer_le·
Great first morning in L.A.: #PECE APSA pre-conference off to an exciting start & NEW publication on how the distributional implications of climate policy affect individual policy support AND redistribution preferences just out @Env_Pol. Thread to follow…tinyurl.com/43dcecj4
Environmental Politics@Env_Pol

New research article! 'Who’s afraid of more ambitious climate policy? How distributional implications shape policy support and compensatory preferences' by Lena Maria Schaffer. @schaffer_le tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

English
0
8
25
3.8K
Sara Hobolt
Sara Hobolt@sarahobolt·
The University of Oxford has got you covered when it comes to titles! My current favourites are “Younger” or “Queen” - or perhaps a combination!
Sara Hobolt tweet mediaSara Hobolt tweet mediaSara Hobolt tweet media
English
3
4
50
13.3K
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage@NannaLauritz·
& we show that local politicians are keen to attribute responsibility for poor outcomes to higher levels of government, especially when these are unaligned with the party of the respondent. This suggests vertical over horizontal partisan blame-shifting.
English
0
0
1
116
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage@NannaLauritz·
We study this using a between-subjects survey experiment fielded among local politicians in Norway (N = 1073). Findings: local politicians attribute responsibility for outcomes in primary education predominantly to school personnel and do not engage in local party-political blame
English
1
0
1
156
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage@NannaLauritz·
@DominicDWells @rmkubinec This has also happened to me, so although most feedback is extremely valuable, I have to consider whether it's worth changing things when another reviewer might dislike it.
English
0
0
0
21
Dominic D. Wells
Dominic D. Wells@DominicDWells·
@rmkubinec I got a rejection and made major revisions based on the comments from reviewers before submitting to another journal. The reviewers at the new journal mostly hated the things the first reviewers had suggested. I don't make major revisions based on comments from a rejection now.
English
2
0
13
528
Robert Kubinec
Robert Kubinec@rmkubinec·
Pls don't retaliate for this. Reviewer comments are very noisy; unless the journal gives an R&R, it often doesn't make sense to take all (or even any) comments into consideration--especially for junior scholars/grad students who need to publish before the end of the century.
Arturs Logins@ALogins

Received an invitation to review a manuscript I rejected for another journal where I gave tons of in-depth comments. The authors have taken exactly 0 of my remarks into account. Should I reject and send the same remarks? Decline to review (because of higher-order reasons)? Other?

English
13
8
265
134.6K
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage
Nanna Lauritz Schönhage@NannaLauritz·
Where would you publish a short paper/research note discussing null results from a field experiment? For political science journals?
English
1
0
1
483