Frank Mackey
19.7K posts

Frank Mackey
@NarrativeCombat
Deduce and destroy.
Boomtown, USA Katılım Aralık 2021
1.1K Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@timber001 You should read his book. Surely the answers must be in there.
English

@Pregory1 @FNazis85244 @mk4_lul @ceterispar1bus I’d make him follow me around everywhere to tell me the time whenever I ask so I don’t have to wear a watch anymore.
Excited to see what you do here as the possibilities are endless.
English

@NarrativeCombat @FNazis85244 @mk4_lul @ceterispar1bus Google says I can make him my indentured servant for a maximum of 7 years, but we’ll see what the courts have to say about that.
I will change his legal name to “Mildew” and make him do all my grocery shopping.
GIF

English

Citadel, as viewed by the vulgar
GIF
Frank Mackey@NarrativeCombat
When in doubt, always blame the sHoRt sElLeRs!!!! Because every story needs a villain & surely it’s not the fund manager who got himself into this mess in the first place. Speaking of villains, everyone wants to make Citadel one here but it’s actually the hero. Phew.
English

@OHare888 He’s right but that lesson extends well beyond just alts.
English

@dampedspring How does raising new capital dilute existing LPs?
English

My only comment on Leopold is from experience of closing down a fund. (Our problem wasn't losses it was a terrible job by our administration and our own back office to book our trades in an auditable fashion which caused an audit delay and redemptions)
Leopold had a margin call but that's not the big problem. He's liquidated his public book and paid off his margin and his shareholders who didn't subscribe in the last 3 months or so are up money. BUT all LP's now own a very different book. When we were faced with redemptions we sold perfect slices of our entire book and avoided side pockets. Selling the illiquid stuff was a challenge of course but the last thing we wanted was to force our remaining and loyal LP's to become massively exposed to our illiquid book while our redeeming clients (no longer clients) got out from proceeds from our liquid book. Why would you treat your loyal investors so poorly?
Just from press coverage of this event it appears the liquid book was liquidated to cover margin and likely if excess equity remained in that book that cash raised will pay redemptions.
LP's that stay will hold private illiquid assets only. That's a radical shift from what they used to own. Besides this perhaps they have less confidence in the team? Will they want to hold? Here's the thing. If you are an LP now you are staring at other LP's and when you are an LP of a fund with no liquidity you know that getting out first is best. Remember there are many many hedge funds and investment vehicles that you can replace your Leopold investment with. This isn't an investment decision this is a game theory redemption cycle thing. The fund needs to raise new capital if it can and that will dilute you. If it can't raise new capital redemptions pressure will cause a responsible fund to gate you. While the risk is now mostly gone. The leveraged holding of illiquid private stocks and the redemption dynamics make this a very difficult story.
English

@ebitdaddy90 Jesse Eisenberg is 42 years old. It’s not 2010 anymore.
English
Frank Mackey retweetledi

Financial markets are no place for friends. They are ruthless and uncaring, and frankly don’t work otherwise.
In a land of big bad wolves, Kenny G is a fucking dragon. Leo didn’t manage his risk so he burnt him to a crisp.
Ponzi Trader@buyerofponzi
one of the most predatory hits in modern financial history orchestrated by citadel
English
Frank Mackey retweetledi

@Newsandstuff4me @lilbabygandhi I/P broke progressive brains like COVID broke conservative brains
English

@Linus200712345 This is the case of someone excelling at something and then being abismally dog shit at another. The guy is too far gone.
English
Frank Mackey retweetledi

Tucker Carlson's favourite "political scientist", John Mearsheimer, and his ATROCIOUS predictions on the war in Ukraine:
Feb. 2022: "I don't think Russia is going to invade."
Sep. 2023: "The Ukrainians are doomed to lose."
Jan. 2024: "It's ridiculous to think Ukraine can hold the line in 2024."
Apr. 2025: "It's unimaginable Ukraine will hang on beyond 2025."
Jul. 2026: "The Russians are slowly moving forward."
The Jim Cramer of foreign policy predictions.
English













