Neiled It

@gt65dusk @SonofManwithus Imagine your house is casing a shadow on your back garden, like in the photo below. Now imagine that beyond that 20 foot long shadow is nothing but space. We may have gone to the moon, but the photos are fake.

@PKoolen1967 @JamesBlunt So does @JamesBlunt. They're beautiful....

@JamesBlunt I shave mine.

I use conditioner on my armpits.

@Oceanbreeze473 Isn't she the woman that got thrown off the Water gate inquiry?🤣

Young Bill & Hillary Clinton in the 1970s. Still together 50 years later. No scandals. No cheating. No drama. Just true love.

@Bob76046 @BGatesIsaPyscho Flat Earthers are retards, agreed. You don't have to be a flat earther to consider that they "may" have lied to us about the moon landings.

@BGatesIsaPyscho Flat earthers are more retarded and desperate today than ever before.

Spot The Difference

@Rudbrps @alexboge @Th0ughtcrime2 Not anti-science at all. Science is all about questioning and understanding. Not blindly accepting what you are told. If scientists tell me an apple is an orange, I will challenge it. Only a science denier would accept it. I can only say what I see with my eyes.🙂

@NeilBritt4 @alexboge @Th0ughtcrime2 The anti-science layperson from X has spoken everyone! We can put the moon hoax debate to bed now.

Dear Deniers in my comments… YAWN 🥱 Can one of you - just ONE - ever bring something new to the table?! Or is it the same brain-dead comments, the same dumb claims, the same debunked memes, and the same pathetically misunderstood photos and videos on infinite repeat? Everything you’re typing has been explained, dismantled, and buried thousands of times. These aren’t “theories” anymore. They’re zombie conspiracies - dead on arrival, no brains left, just shambling around mindlessly repeating the same scripted lines they were programmed with. That’s why we get short with you. That’s why we roast you on sight. That’s why we point, mock and laugh at you. 
Because the second we see your comment, we already know the exact garbage you’re about to drop… and we already have the receipts that destroyed it years ago. You don’t research. 
You don’t learn. 
You just deny, ignore, and regurgitate. Welcome to the zombie apocalypse, folks. 
And the zombies are in my comment section. 🧟‍♂️

@apollo_owl @NASA I'm happy with them for less than 500 quid. Thanks for your support.

@NeilBritt4 @NASA Your photos look indead taken with a cheap telescope and phone. Blurred. Chromatic aberration... Etc etc... Don't be so hard on yourself though - calling your photos rubbish. Although you are correct.

New photos from the Moon! We're continuing to unveil new images from the Artemis II mission—including these two photos from April 6, showing a crescent Earthrise and a closeup of the lunar farside. Keep up with the latest: nasa.gov/artemis-ii-mul…

@itsBhengz @NASA Have you heard of telescopes? They've been around at least 300 years.

@NeilBritt4 @NASA Bro how do u get clear shot of 243,000km away?

@liamgallagher 🤣🤣🤣🤣Yeah, right.😂

I wanna thank all the people who voted for us it’s a real honour ever since I was a little kid and singing in the shower I’d dream about 1 day being in the RnR hall of fame it’s true what they say anything is possible if you have a dream LG x

@digijordan Just take some photos of daytime stars then. I'll wait.

The first photo, I took tonight with my phone. The second one NASA took…with billions of dollars. I was screamed at by dozens of rabid people, about how it’s IMPOSSIBLE to capture stars with a bright light in the foreground. The pic I took has tons of light pollution AND the atmosphere working against it… And you can see hundreds of stars. NASA’s has ZERO STARS. I just really don’t get it.

@alexboge @RealActionBill @Paulssen5 I'm right. Only a few hundred at most would need to be involved.

@NeilBritt4 @RealActionBill @Paulssen5 You are wrong, think harder.

@alexboge @Rudbrps @Th0ughtcrime2 I see what you are saying. But it really doesn't look like that to me. The terrain looks flat with a shadow at 45' which nearly touches the horizon. This is true of almost all lunar photographs.

It looks like a “close horizon” because it isn’t a true horizon at all. On the Moon, the real geometric horizon is much farther away, but the surface is uneven. What you’re seeing in that photo is nearby terrain, a slight rise or ridge, blocking your line of sight. With the camera low to the ground and the lens compressing distance, that rise looks like a horizon even though it’s only a short distance away. The shadow runs up that slope, and perspective makes it seem like it’s reaching that “horizon.” So it’s not a distant edge of the Moon, it’s just local terrain rising into view, which is completely normal on a rough surface like the lunar regolith.

@alexboge @RealActionBill @Paulssen5 Please just explain the photo then.

@alexboge It's a real fucking photo. You are disbelieving the evidence of your own eyes and can't cope. Please explain the shadow on the official nasa photo.

@NeilBritt4 Fake photos and lies from deniers isn’t new

@RealActionBill @alexboge @Paulssen5 You're wrong. Only flight control need to be in on the hoax. The second that rocket leaves the ground all the scientists and engineers believe they have done their job and built a machine "capable of reaching the moon and returning safely.." Please explain the photo.

@NeilBritt4 @alexboge @Paulssen5 x.com/RealActionBill…

@Rudbrps @Th0ughtcrime2 @alexboge Are you an actual retard? This is an actual NASA photo that you decline to acknowledge. The shadow almost touches the horizon. How can this be? commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apol…

> but the photos are fake The official NASA images are not. But yes, these Photoshop composites assembled by anti-science conspiracy theorists ARE in fact quite fake. It raises an interesting point though: Why are MoLDs and Flerfs so inherently dishonest? Why can't they (you) simply post authentic, officially approved photographs to make your points?

@Batboy_Supreme @BGatesIsaPyscho Yet you don't understand light and photography.

@NeilBritt4 @BGatesIsaPyscho A vastly better one than you could ever imagine to be.

This was recorded from Earth using a Nikon Telescope. So why couldn’t Artemis II provide us better imagery given that it’s 240,000 miles closer & why couldn’t they do the reverse but zoom in on Earth? Simple questions with what should be a simple answer.

@alexboge You asked for something new, now you can't cope.🤣🤣🤣🤣

@alexboge x.com/i/status/20436…

@alexboge @goodlobster1 You're gonna block me in 5, 4, 3... Cause you can't get your head round it either.

@NeilBritt4 @goodlobster1 You can’t prove me wrong, you are a mental midget.

@alexboge @Paulssen5 Insults but no answers. You lose. Please make it make sense.

@NeilBritt4 @Paulssen5 Your inability to accept you’re retarded should tell you enough,

@alexboge @Rudbrps @Th0ughtcrime2 Ok. Explain the original Nasa photo then. I sent you the link. Struggling much?

@NeilBritt4 @Rudbrps @Th0ughtcrime2 Fake photo, no earth in the original

@alexboge @goodlobster1 Yet you can't explain the lunar landers shadow. You lose.