Battlefield Historian
38 posts

Battlefield Historian
@NeilPowell1964
We are an historical map and photo archive dedicated to making our nations' histories available to all.
Eye, Suffolk Katılım Ekim 2023
281 Takip Edilen219 Takipçiler

@BritishArmyWDs @rentaquill @ColesBooks @almurray and three for Sicily but none for Dunkirk I am afraid
English

Hard to photograph, but you can get a copy for your wall from @ColesBooks. Pontoon bridge in the wrong place ... buildings drawn in the middle of the road ... less than ideal ... but IDEAL FOR NAVIGATING BLACK TUESDAY @almurray .
coles-books.co.uk/books/history/…
British Army War Diaries@BritishArmyWDs
Yesterday I found a Town Plan Map of Arnhem used 80 years ago by the 1st Airborne Division.
English

@BritishArmyWDs @rentaquill @ColesBooks @almurray No I have Njimegen Eindhoven and Arnhem in the same series
English

@rentaquill @ColesBooks @almurray You could always get a full size, flat, unwrinkled, digital version @300DPI from us of course :)
English

@rjlinney @TooFatLardies Thats the erudite version of mine :)
English

@NeilPowell1964 @TooFatLardies I prefer, "Make something foolproof and someone will make a better fool," but I agree.
English

@ReassessHistory This document excludes Crown Copyright Jonathan - the rues around CC images are even clearer than this and make the images even more accesible
English

@ReassessHistory If we collected all the images we all hold and made them available then we have another way of skinnning this particular cat - just a thought
English

@ReassessHistory no one belives this can be done for free without a huge intervention but often people power is the strongest asset we have. We charge 7.50 per image to cover all our costs and there are no onward costs, no license fees, no copyright restrictions now 'sweat of our brow' costs :)
English

@ReassessHistory we will force institutions like the IWM to rethink their position. At Battlefield Historian we have been offering these images at a price that recognises that running a website costs some money and needs to be covered and the time to administer the images also has a cost impact
English

@ReassessHistory As a collective of historians/authors/collectors we must have thousands and thousands of these CC images in our own collections. Surely if we collect these images in a single location and make them available for everyone with no licence fee and no onward charges then ... /6
English

@ReassessHistory 4. These items belong to us as a collective. 5. The IWM positions is never going to change (I repeated that). 6. we are all approaching this the wrong way. Knowing that the IWM will not change their position then we need to find another way. /5
English

@ReassessHistory 3. These same images exist all over the world in archives such as Alamy, Getty, NAM, Bovington GTank Museum, NARA. There are multiple copies of most of these images. They can be obtained anywhere.
/3
English

@ReassessHistory There are some observations/factors that are clear. 1. The IWM's position is never going to change (revenue streams will prevent this) 2. They are wrong - after 50 yrs Crown Copyright (CC) ceases to exist and CC images move into the public domain. They do not belong to the IWM /2
English

@ReassessHistory At battlefieldhistorian.com we have been fighting this issue of presumed copyright for crown copyright material for twenty years. It is my belief that if we apply some good old fashioned JSCS planning to the problem it is easily resolved. /1
English









