Network Law Review

The end of net neutrality? Daniel Spulber argues that recent court decisions have effectively ended the FCC's net neutrality regulation, which will encourage investment, innovation, and support the continued expansion of e-commerce networklawreview.org/farewell-net-n…

This month’s reading suggestions from @profschrepel. Inside: an LLM that predicts case outcomes, the fight over public ownership of the big AI labs, and whether you can tell when AI wrote the article. Plus Pinker on common knowledge. networklawreview.org/june-2026/

Each month, the Network Law Review publishes curated reading lists selecting the most relevant new papers in antitrust, AI, and tech policy. Combined with case-law tracking across jurisdictions, it becomes a real working tool. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscribe/ (it's free)

🎉 Celebrating the 10th issue of Antitrust Antidote! @kwongervin, Jeremy Kauffman, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson share everything you need to know on US antitrust from April–June 2026: from the Nexstar-Tegna merger fight to Phhhoto v. Meta and beyond networklawreview.org/antidote-10/

In memoriam: Marius Schwartz (@Georgetown) In tribute to Marius, we are republishing the article today. We extend our deepest condolences to his family, to Yongmin Chen, and to his many colleagues and friends. networklawreview.org/default-positi…

📚 Our Editor-in-Chief @ProfSchrepel shares his May reading suggestions: rugged landscapes & competition policy, populist antitrust’s error costs, the data-center water debate, EU AI-compute sovereignty, blockchain governance & more. networklawreview.org/may-2026/

What if the most important innovations of the next decade aren’t in technology, but in institutions themselves? @profjasonpotts thinks they are. Come and listen to his provocative talk on i/acc. Live talk + Q&A with @profSchrepel 👇 alti.amsterdam/event/jason-po…

Firms innovate not along a smooth path but on “rugged technological landscapes”, balancing risky frontier breakthroughs against niche innovation. This has implications for competition policy, as argued by Professors Callander, Lambert, and Matouschek. networklawreview.org/rugged-landsca…

Looking for a reliable way to track antitrust case law across jurisdictions? The Network Law Review runs dedicated series covering the U.S., Europe, and Latin America. No equivalent resource brings this together in one place. Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscribe/ (it's free)

Catch up on Latin American antitrust news in the new Chronicles: digital markets regulation, Apple’s iOS settlement, and institutional reform in Argentina and Mexico, written by Carlos Ragazzo, @aboutmattiuzzo, Bruna Cataldo, and Clara Duarte Late networklawreview.org/latin-antitrus…

📚 April 2026 reading suggestions are out. AI agents meet complexity economics. The waterbed effect collapses. The AI moat wobbles. Europe drifts into American dependence. Hayek’s papers go online. Barabási on networks. By @ProfSchrepel 👇 networklawreview.org/april-2026/.

New issue of @NetworkLawRev “Antitrust Antidote,” covering decisions from Q1 2026 networklawreview.org/antidote-9/

Three months of US Antitrust news in the new Antitrust Antidote: refusal to deal, innovation harm in pipeline mergers, and antitrust standing, written by @kwongervin, Jeremy Kauffman, Jeremy Sandford, and Nathan Wilson networklawreview.org/antidote-9/

✨New series✨ We introduce "Pott's of Arabia" wherein @profjasonpotts examines institutional market reforms toward innovation and competition in Saudi Arabia. First piece: a shift toward a dynamic competition paradigm. networklawreview.org/potts-arabia-o…

New issue of Competition Stories is out, open access, as always. This one covers: parallel investigations in digital markets, tying doctrine under pressure, Android Auto ruling, the €2.95B Google AdTech fine... EU competition law moves fast. We track it. networklawreview.org/competition-st…

Catch up on EU competition law with the new Stories by Mario Siragusa & Alice Setari from @ClearyGottlieb, covering parallel investigations by the Commission and NCAs, tensions in abuse doctrines and digital market realities and more! networklawreview.org/competition-st…

Here are @ProfSchrepel monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI's reshaping of research and publishing, the economics of AI talent in universities, using AI to audit EU regulation, economic growth and the rise of large firms, and more... networklawreview.org/march-2026/

Where else can you read Hovenkamp on monopoly power, Acemoglu on taxing digital ads, case-law analysis, and curated monthly readings designed to keep you up to date without the noise? Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscribe (it's free!)

Is antitrust law about fairness? Herbert Hovenkamp’s answer is clear: no, and it never was. In this new piece, @Sherman1890 dismantles the growing assumption in competition debates that antitrust should correct inequality or redistribute economic power 👉 networklawreview.org/hovenkamp-fair….

New on @NetworkLawRev: Generative AI is increasing academic output. But when attention is scarce, output does not equal influence. The Matthew effect intensifies. Stratification follows networklawreview.org/matthew-effect/