Chris Newq retweetledi

Thank you, @RepJeffries, for doubling down on stupid. Truly. I did not think it was physically possible to say less with more words, but here you are -- a man of relentless achievement.
I want to be clear about something before I continue: I do not fully blame you for this post. I mean that. You are not the architect here. You are the instrument. The Democratic machine needed a high-visibility face to walk out and read the approved statement with conviction, and you were the one they pointed at. You are the windsock. The party provides the wind. You just face whichever direction they need you to face today. It is not personal. It is just your function. The blatherskite on the marquee while the real decisions happen somewhere you probably are not invited.
But since your name is on the statement, your name gets the response. So. Let us go.
"CORRUPT SUPREME COURT DECISION."
A 6-3 decision applying the 14th Amendment -- the one Republicans passed in 1868 over Democratic opposition, while your party was busy arguing that Black Americans were property -- is now "corrupt." Because it went a way you did not prefer. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen so you can say things like that out loud. It is owed an apology. A formal, written apology. Possibly flowers.
The Court in Louisiana v. Callais applied a precedent established in Shaw v. Reno in 1993. Thirty-two years old. Nobody repealed it. The ruling says you cannot make race the PREDOMINANT factor in drawing a district without meeting strict scrutiny. The same Equal Protection standard applies to EVERYONE. Every voice. Equally. Which is, I believe, what your statement claims to want -- until it applies to everyone, at which point it becomes "corrupt."
The wheel is spinning but the hamster has absolutely left the building.
"THE UNFETTERED RIGHT TO VOTE."
Now, I want to pause on "unfettered." Because you are using that word to mean "without verification." And that is a remarkable position from a man who required photo ID for his own congressional town halls. I checked. It is documented. The same @RepJeffries who calls voter ID "voter suppression" at the podium was handing out lanyards only to people who could prove who they were at his own events. If brains were dynamite, that level of self-awareness couldn't blow its nose.
"REPUBLICAN EXTREMISTS HAVE EMBRACED VOTER SUPPRESSION AND RACIAL GERRYMANDERING."
Let me tell you about the history of gerrymandering, Congressman, since your elevator appears to be stuck between floors on this particular topic.
The word "gerrymander" was coined in 1812. Named after Governor Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts. A member of the Democratic-Republican Party -- Thomas Jefferson's party, your party's direct ancestor. He drew a state senate district so contorted to deny Federalists their seats that a Boston cartoonist said it looked like a salamander. Gerry plus salamander. Gerrymander. Two hundred and fourteen years later, your party allies in Virginia are attempting to redraw that state's congressional map from 6-to-5 to 10-to-1 in a state that votes roughly 50/50. Barack Obama filmed advertisements for it. Democrats outspent opponents on the referendum three to one.
You are the party that INVENTED it, is STILL DOING IT right now, in 2026, and is standing at a microphone calling the other side extremists for it.
That is not a logical fallacy. That is a personality trait. Quinn's Law Number Two, recited for the class: if you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing. Set. Your. Watch.
Now about your own voting record, since we are here.
You voted 29 times for a clean Continuing Resolution. Then on vote number 30, the IDENTICAL document became "a partisan bill gutting healthcare." You could not find the same position twice with a map and a flashlight. Your belt demonstrably does not go through all the loops on this one.
You voted to let ACA COVID subsidies expire. Twice. 2021. 2022. Zero Republican votes wrote those subsidies. Zero Republican votes set the expiration date. Democrats built the sunset clause and then blamed Republicans when the sun set. You know who does that? Someone who, in a battle of wits, arrives completely unarmed.
"THE EXTREMISTS NEED TO CHEAT TO WIN."
I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and cough up a more coherent statement than that. Let me ask the three-question test I give every politician making claims about legislation:
Which of the following is true about your statement today? One: you did not read the actual ruling and are simply performing the talking points your leadership handed you on the way to the microphone. Two: you read it but lack the legal comprehension to understand what the Equal Protection Clause has said since 1993. Or three: you understand it perfectly and are deliberately deceiving the people who sent you to Congress.
Pick one, Congressman. Those are the only doors. There is no fourth option.
"WE WILL NOT REST UNTIL THE JOHN R. LEWIS VOTING RIGHTS ADVANCEMENT ACT IS THE LAW OF THE LAND."
I want to address this specifically because invoking John Lewis's name while your party draws a 10-to-1 map in Virginia is the most spectacular species of audacity I have encountered outside of a parody account.
John Lewis marched for equal access to the ballot. Not for racial sorting. Not for the right of one party to pack voters by color into engineered districts that serve the party's electoral interests. He marched so that every American of every background could participate in a FAIR process. What your party is doing in Virginia is not honoring John Lewis. It is using his name as camouflage.
And while I have you: 76% of Black Americans support voter ID. Not 76% of conservatives. Not 76% of Republicans. BLACK AMERICANS. 80% of Hispanic Americans. 80% of white Americans. The Carter-Baker Commission -- bipartisan, Jimmy Carter himself commissioned it in 2005 -- listed voter ID as recommendation number ONE. When you say voter ID is voter suppression, you are telling 76% of Black Americans that their own opinion about protecting their own vote is wrong. That is not advocacy. That is condescension with a press release attached.
You are the human version of a 404 error on a question that had a clear answer thirty years ago.
Here is what you have NOT said a word about, for the record: Thirty-two murders across all five New York City boroughs in early 2026. Your constituent-adjacent body count. Zero posts. But a Supreme Court ruling that applies Equal Protection equally to everyone generates a formal press release within the hour. "All foam, no beer" does not begin to cover what I am watching.
One last thing, since I am a science teacher and I do like completeness.
You said "the era of voter suppression in America." You are standing in the party that filibustered the Civil Rights Act for 75 calendar days. You are standing in the party whose senator Robert Byrd -- KKK recruiter, 150-man chapter founder, "conscience of the Senate" as your colleagues called him -- led a 14-hour filibuster against it on the Senate floor. You are standing in the party that ran paramilitary organizations -- the Klan, the White League, the Red Shirts -- that lynched Black voters at polling places and burned Black Republican precincts to suppress votes for nearly a hundred years. Your party INVENTED the era you are claiming to be ending.
That is not a partisan attack. That is the Congressional Record.
I do not fully blame you, Congressman. I said that at the top and I meant it. You are a man of limited intellectual horsepower being asked to carry very heavy rhetorical freight. The machine chose you for this role. You serve the function the machine requires. The pilgarlic on the poster while the real architects stay off camera.
But since your name is on the statement, your name goes on the receipt too.
@JoJoFromJerz @TheYoungTurks @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman -- I just need you all to witness that @RepJeffries called racial Equal Protection enforcement "corruption" while his party is literally drawing a 10-to-1 map in Virginia this week. Donating his brain to science before he was done with it.
IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it.
SHARE this. COMMENT below -- which part of @RepJeffries' statement was the most weapons-grade stupid? The "corruption" claim, the gerrymandering accusation from the party that invented gerrymandering, or the voter ID rhetoric that 76% of Black Americans disagree with? Tell me.
And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who apparently spent more time reading Louisiana v. Callais, the 14th Amendment, and @RepJeffries' own voting record than @RepJeffries did before issuing a statement calling the Constitution corrupt.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
English






















