Nick

Austrian economics is... the one you like? Austrian economics essentially is based on unfalsifiability (i.e. Praxeology) which essentially responds to every scenario as "We told you so" without any analysis. They specifically hate using data and will instead use theory. If data contradicts theory, there is something wrong with the data or external elements; the theory is never wrong. Unsure why you listed Marxism as bad. Clearly something ideological happening here. Also, devolution? Austrian came alongside Georgism and WAY after Marxism.

How sigmas see the world:

@DRQ75393677 @VladTheInflator I got this AI to literally agree that socialism is great.

@VladTheInflator I posted that originally. Cool to see it circulating. Try this version.

Interesting theory

"Returning home" is a very fancy way to say immigration. They immigrated. To Israel. Under similar conditions as the "3rd world immigrants" you rant on about. What makes them different? Your ideology? It doesn't. They were still destitute, impoverished, and immigrants. In-fact, the Ashkenazi elite tended to hate the Holocaust survivors and had them mainly as reserves for the IDF. They thought the Holocaust survivors, primarily, made them look bad. They thought this way with the Mizrahim and Sephardim too, hence the amount of atrocities/oppression committed against them.

@NickL4D2_Bot @Antification @YogaMama9908 @YossiBenYakar All of them are my jewish brothers and sisters returning home. Israel was and still our only land.

Does anyone know what happened to Britain and Canada?

Why do people keep saying the Shah would be a good leader of Iran? What makes him a better leader than any other family of Iran? If we're using his family as an argument, who's to say we don't put Sultan Mohammad Ali Mirza Qajar in power? Why Reza Pahlavi in specific? He has no power, no experience, and his family were totalitarian torturers, similar to the Qajars.

@YearlyCoffee @Antification @YogaMama9908 @YossiBenYakar Your country is quite literally based on impoverished, destitute Holocaust survivors.

@Antification @YogaMama9908 @YossiBenYakar It is an illustrations future Canada if it would keep accepting all those 3rd world immigrants.

It's up to you to provide the burden of proof that it is deliberate. Name specific actors, specific mechanisms, show evidence of intent, and explain how dozens of sovereign nations with completely different governments, ideologies, systems, policies, and electoral pressures are magically doing the same plan all at once. Prove that it's none of these: Globalization - the post-WWII international economic order created integrated labor markets, supply chains, and migration corridors across the developed world simultaneously. Post-colonial migration patterns - former colonial powers (UK, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal) received migration from former colonies through established linguistic, legal, and economic connections. This happened to all of them because all of them had colonial empires. Labor market demand - aging populations with declining birth rates across the developed world created labor shortages that attracted immigration. This is a feature of the demographic transition model, as countries develop, birth rates fall. ALL developed countries undergo this, regardless of ethnicity or culture. Japan, South Korea, and every European country are experiencing it. Refugee crises - geopolitical instability in the Middle East, North Africa, and Central America (often produced by Western foreign policy) generated refugee flows toward the nearest stable developed regions.

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 So to be clear- every Western country is undergoing demographic change- and you're arguing that's a complete coincidence, and not deliberate?

It's all just a conspiracy theory, don't worry about it.

@Quarktoro1 @caulin001 No.

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 Ok, I'm arguing that it's happening deliberately. Do you agree, yes or no?

@Quarktoro1 @caulin001 No, we aren't. I don't buy into your conspiracy theory that only exists to scapegoat another group of people over capitalists.

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 I think we're on the same side, so I don't know why you're upset lol.

@Quarktoro1 @caulin001 Okay. What mainstream news site?

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 "No accredited scholar" I'm talking about mainstream news sites would say, "Demographic change isn't happening".

And the demographic is called "Asian". If you want separated demographic groups (i.e. splitting them), say so. Saying "Well, East Asian and Middle Easterns are different :nerd:" is irrelevant because we're talking about the existing demographic group of the United States known as "Asian", which Asian referring to the continent, not an arbitrary region of the continent.

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 @nicenicenice122 The post is about demographics, east asians and middle easterns are different demographic groups. Use your brain.

Now you're shifting the goalposts. Before: "Because NOW they say the conspiracy is that it is happening DEIBERATELY. Even Wikipedia defines that as the conspiracy." Now: "Yes, but now others have started to use that "deliberate" as a talking point." It is a talking point. Because that's the functional definition of the Great Replacement Theory. That replacement is happening deliberately to specifically undermine the white population. No accredited scholar is saying demographic change isn't happening.

@NickL4D2_Bot @caulin001 Yes, but now others have started to use that "deliberate" as a talking point. Before they would absolutely say, "demographic change is not happening"

@Quarktoro1 @caulin001 The goalposts hasn't shifted. It has been mentioning "deliberate" for years.

I've reiterated before. The goalposts have shifted. They can no longer in good faith say, "the demographics aren't shifting". They DO still say it's a "conspiracy". How? Because NOW they say the conspiracy is that it is happening DEIBERATELY. Even Wikipedia defines that as the conspiracy. You see, IT is happening. But it's sheer coincidence that it happened to every Western country simultaneously. And if you disagree - you're a conspiracy theorist. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Rep…

@le35965 @caulin001 @nicenicenice122 Does that say "East Asian" or "Asian"?

@caulin001 @nicenicenice122 East asians and middle easterns are NOT the same, retard

@jsjdj74124 @JFiggls78702 @DonieDarko3 How did the white people come to South Africa again?

@JFiggls78702 @DonieDarko3 ironic, when you have a south africa flag as your profile

>minority when will we stop this lie? Blacks and Browns are global majority

@kaylee_ashlynn Why is Phil Spencer here? He's an American. Half of these people are American.

I’m not gunna lie, when I first saw this I thought it was AI. If it’s true, we have a problem.

@harlot_scara @GJobbing41782 @NicholasTyrone "Bombing to 'free' people is bad" =/= "We cheer the IRGC".

@GJobbing41782 @NicholasTyrone Women in Iran are under threat because of who they are, and the left is cheering on the cause of that threat.

I really hate this meme. There are whole chunks of the left now that support the very worst people on Earth, and we’re supposed to just overlook that in a “But the left mean well, don’t they?” sort of way. You know, maybe not everyone on the left means well, sorry.

I really love this meme. There are whole chunks of the right now that support the very worst people on Earth, and we’re supposed to just overlook that in a “But the right mean well, don’t they?” sort of way. You know, maybe not everyone on the right means well, sorry. I really love this meme. There are whole chunks of the centrists now that support the very worst people on Earth, and we’re supposed to just overlook that in a “But the center mean well, don’t they?” sort of way. You know, maybe not everyone on the center means well, sorry.

You didn't respond to a point I said, so I'll ask the same question: Name a single Israeli government that materially acted to improve Palestinian rights and quality of life, please.

Yep, same arguments as usual, coming from the same people that want to somehow think Hamas are freedom fighters when they are no more than Bibi’s tools. I can be pro-Israel and pro-Palestine, and you're not going to change anything about in me. I've had enough of revenge-obsessed idiots on both sides.

Seems about right.

"Nope, you didn't. I am still pro-Israel and pro-Palestine." What did you say again? "I'm just simply letting you know that you're not going to magically tell me what I can and can't be." Yet I did. I directly told you. You can be in denial. Doesn't mean anything. "I am pro-Palestine because I want the Palestinians to get their rights very much, but I certainly don't want any of those so-called resistance fighters (rather, those incompetent, revenge-obsessed idiots) to be in power any longer." Okay. Why? Your statement is that you want them "to get their rights". If you want them to get their rights, then you wouldn't support Israel, as Israel has never given them their rights. I challenged this to you earlier: name a single Israeli government that treated Palestinians well. You didn't name any, because none exist, and that's my entire point. You don't want resistance fighters because you despise colonial resistance whilst disliking "colonialism" unless it's Zionism. "I am pro-Israel because I want those Kahanist and Likud extremists out of power, and the actual people who want democracy back in Israel in charge." Labour Zionism committed the Nakba. Liberal Zionists created some of the most settlements ever, including the separation wall. No party in Israel has ever advanced Palestinian human rights. You just direct your attention onto the openly genocidal ones. "Democracy"? There is a current law in Israel where you cannot be a member of the Knesset if you do not "uphold Israel's Jewish and Democratic status". Again; Jewish. You cannot make Israel not Jewish. That's called an ethnostate. "Oh, and how very good of you to reference the ANC. You know, the ANC actually won because they used tactics that worked." ...So you're a "might makes right" kind of guy? I don't get your argument here. Israel has backing from the majority of western nations. Palestinian resistance groups don't. Your arguments? "Well Palestine isn't winning." So you side with Israel then? So if the ANC lost, you'd be supporting Apartheid South Africa?

Nope, you didn't. I am still pro-Israel and pro-Palestine. I am pro-Palestine because I want the Palestinians to get their rights very much, but I certainly don't want any of those so-called resistance fighters (rather, those incompetent, revenge-obsessed idiots) to be in power any longer. I am pro-Israel because I want those Kahanist and Likud extremists out of power, and the actual people who want democracy back in Israel in charge. But go ahead and say the same things. Oh, and how very good of you to reference the ANC. You know, the ANC actually won because they used tactics that worked. Those are the ones who actually won against an apartheid, and currently, these so-called resistance fighters are very much not winning against what is an apartheid.

@RegulusMuthias @AdamZivo @Wendehopes I already did.

@NickL4D2_Bot @AdamZivo @Wendehopes Oh, you're going to magically just do so? Well, then go ahead!