Nick Manderachia

@washghost1 How is 2 not better? That original tile was fucking awful.

Lost all its charm

The real reason the whole entire world is so scared of white men.

@TRobinsonNewEra The only thing decent at McDonald's is the double quarter pounder.

America your McDonald’s chicken nuggets are SHIT

If America is to survive we must separate from leftists or deny them the franchise This is not hyperbole

You barley need ICE agents if you tax remittances, punish the employers of illegal, and deny them banking End healthcare, education, and welfare for illegals and the scam is over Everyone knows this, including the Trump admin

If we repeal Hart Cellar, the Islamic reign of terror will end.

BREAKING: The United States has confirmed B-52 Stratofortress bombers are now striking Iran. Understand what this means by understanding the sequence. On February 28, the US sent B-2 Spirits. The B-2 is a stealth bomber. It costs $2.1 billion per aircraft. The US has 20 of them. You send B-2s when the enemy’s air defences are intact and you need to penetrate undetected. Four B-2s dropped 160,000 pounds of bunker-busting ordnance on hardened underground facilities in the opening wave. On March 2, the US sent B-1 Lancers. The B-1 is a supersonic bomber. Faster than the B-2 but not stealth. You send B-1s when air defences have been degraded enough that speed, not invisibility, is sufficient to survive. The B-1s conducted the deepest raids into Iran since 2003. On March 3, the US sent B-52s. The B-52 is a 70-year-old subsonic aircraft. It is not stealth. It is not fast. It has a radar cross-section the size of a barn. It flies at 650 miles per hour at 50,000 feet and it is visible to every radar system on earth. You send B-52s when there is nothing left to shoot them down. That is the sequence. B-2 when defences are lethal. B-1 when defences are degraded. B-52 when defences are gone. The US Air Force just told you, through aircraft selection alone, that Iran’s integrated air defence network no longer exists as a functional system. The B-52 carries 70,000 pounds of ordnance per sortie. It can launch cruise missiles from standoff range without entering defended airspace at all. The US has 76 of them versus 20 B-2s. Deploying B-52s quadruples the available bomber strike capacity, and each aircraft can deliver more payload per sortie than any other platform in the inventory. 1,700 targets struck. 300 new sites added in the latest wave. $779 million in ordnance expended on the first day alone. Six American service members killed. Eleven aircraft lost. The campaign is intensifying, not tapering. Here is where this connects to every post I have written today. The B-52 deployment proves the conventional campaign is succeeding. Iran’s air defences are neutralised. Its underground facilities are being collapsed. Its missile production is being destroyed. Its leadership is being eliminated. And the Strait of Hormuz is still closed. Because the B-52 cannot sink a mine. It cannot intercept a Shahed drone launched from a fishing boat. It cannot neutralise an anti-ship missile on a mobile coastal launcher. It cannot stop a proxy in Yemen from firing at a tanker in the Red Sea. The asymmetric threat that closes shipping lanes operates beneath the altitude where strategic bombers are relevant. The US is winning the war it chose to fight. It is not winning the war the insurance market cares about. The B-52 is the most powerful expression of that gap. 70,000 pounds of ordnance per sortie. And Lloyd’s of London still will not write a policy for a tanker transiting Hormuz. That is the thesis. In one sentence. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@thelillygaddis @BeardsonBeardly Fuck that goober and marry me 😂

@BeardsonBeardly You could have at least posted the cuter pic we took

had a great time in Paris last week, really needed that vacation

@CNviolations Kids are safe. Approved.

A teacher is under fire for using a rope to keep kindergarten students together on a field trip. Thoughts?

@ChristianHeiens Brilliant

>Conservatives win an election >Leftists appeal to the Constitution, the Rule of Law, Christianity, and the Founding Fathers to ensure that Conservatives never act against them >Leftists win the next election >They immediately discard all of these principles and begin ruthlessly imposing their will on society >They go way too far, lose the following election, and instantly go back to appealing to the Constitution >Conservatives: "The Constitution, huh? Why do you keep using that word?" >Leftists:

@baltimoresun Go fuck yourself

“White flight” is literally just a myth btw

They thought the cameras were off: “Does the island come with children, or where can we abduct them from” 😳

@BlastingThrough Patriot

In 2018, I was deeply honored to be inducted into the U.S. Army Ordnance Corps Hall of Fame. Thank you for your interest in my military career.

@andweknow @KimPKAG4EVA OH NOS, her performance didn’t work!

"You met me at a very strange time in my life"

@BonifaceOption The entire military uses one too.

According to the Supreme Court, IQ cannot be used to screen potential employees (Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 1970) BUT it can be used to disqualify someone from capital punishment (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002, et al). IQ is pseudoscience when beneficial to society, but unimpeachable fact when useful to leftist causes célèbre.

I still can't get over the situation in Minnesota. They fucking imported 100,000 Somali's. Nobody in the fucking government questioned it. They put them all on SNAP and Welfare. Nobody in the fucking government stopped it. They gave them fake fucking daycare centers. Nobody in the fucking government verified it. They gave Ilhan Omar $30 Million of my dollars. Nobody in the government fucking investigated it. They created no-go zones in the United States. Nobody in the government did a fucking thing. The same fucking government won't pass the SAVE Act to protect our elections. The same fucking government that Insider Trades and gets rich without term limits. Fuck your white neighborhoods. Fuck your voter ID laws. Fuck your tax dollars. Fuck your security. Fuck your safety. Fuck your nuclear family that could own a home, two cars, raise 3 kids, live on a single income, and have a stay at home mother. They fucking took that from you and gave it to 3rd world retards. This government fucking robbed us. This government fucking hates us. Who exactly are you fucking working for? Because it clearly isn't working for me.

PSA for New Hampshire churches: If someone ever raids your church to shut down your service and terrorize your congregation, here's a quick guide to how you can lawfully respond. Let's assume that, like in St. Paul, the raiders are loud and menacing but are not initially making explicit threats of violence, brandishing weapons, or touching anyone. 1. First, a church employee or member of your volunteer security team should clearly and forcefully tell the intruders to leave. It's also a good idea to have a trained volunteer call the police at this point. However, you have no legal obligation to wait for the police to arrive before your security team removes the intruders. Trespassing and loud heckling is not a constitutional loophole that allows anti-Christians to freely shut down your church service, terrorize children, and nullify your constitutional, civil, and property rights. 2. Assuming the intruders refuse to leave, they are committing criminal trespass. Your security team may use any non-deadly force they reasonably believe is necessary to remove the trespassers from the church. RSA 627:7. If they can safely do so, it's generally a good idea for your security team to start by attempting to firmly shepherd the intruders out of the church, grabbing or guiding them by the back or shoulders. Suppose the intruders respond by resisting your security team. At this point, the question is what actions your security team "reasonably believes" are necessary to remove the intruders. If there is only one intruder, and you have a security team of two capable men, they are likely only justified in forcibly grabbing the intruder and dragging him from the church. If your situation is more like yesterday's Cities Church raid, on the other hand, your legal options are much broader. At that point, I would personally advise a security team that they are on safe legal grounds to mace the raiders or strike them in the face with their fists. They could also follow the example of Jesus in John 2:15-17. 3. In general, you may use deadly force only if you reasonably believe that an assailant poses an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death to you or a third person. In New Hampshire, you are also allowed to use deadly force whenever you reasonably believe that an assailant is about to commit arson against your premises, a forcible burglary, kidnapping, or any forcible sexual offense - not limited to rape. RSA 627:7; 627:4. These principles also apply to your security team. This means that if, for example, your security team attempts to remove raiders, and the raiders respond by brandishing a deadly weapon, your team can safely use deadly force. It should go without saying that it's a good general rule to have a volunteer security team trained to understand these legal principles. Legally and practically, it's also a good idea for you to prefer security team volunteers who have military or law enforcement experience, as well as for the team to carry both firearms and other, non-deadly alternatives such as riot spray. A prepared, well-equipped security team of two men might have been able to quickly disperse yesterday's attack on this St. Paul church and allowed this family to continue worshipping.

BREAKING: Minnesota AG Keith Ellison officially faces criminal referral to the DOJ for his alleged involvement in Somali fraud.