Nick Reynosa

@JonSpeedTheBook @LilaGraceRose m.youtube.com/watch?v=IXkmGd…

Be sure to check out this confrontation between Nick Reynosa and @LilaGraceRose. She does not take responsibility for the grift of Live Action in a holocaust, while supporting a pr()-ch()ice platform in 2024. These orgs must be held accountable for their claims vs. their actions.

Here is my full debate with Lila Rose at Stanford University. On 6/27/22 Lila Rose stated, "This decision to overturn Roe v Wade will save millions of lives" According to the Guttmacher Institute there have been 4,190,792 abortions since Dobbs. According to the Journal of the American Medical Association there have been an additional 56,682 live births. In the context of the Guttmacher data this means out of every 75 women who sought an abortion 74 still got one. -Under Lila's leadership 69 percent of Americans support abortion in the first trimester of abortion. That is an all-time high in the 23-year history of Live Action. -The Republican Party has removed any attempt for federal protection for the unborn for the first time in Live Action's History -Under Lila's leadership the pro-life movement has lost 15 state referendums. -Lila voted for and publicly supported both Donald Trump and JD Vance who both publicly supported the abortion pill and both promised to veto federal abortions bans *before* Lila's endorsement. The abortion pill results in over 630,000 deaths per year. She refused to answer whether JD Vance should be excommunicated for his pro-choice beliefs. Even in the face of these abysmal results, Lila continued to lie to her supporters about the success of the pro-life movement. On 6/24/25 Lila stated "The pro-life movement is winning the culture war" Despite these repeated failures, Lila still had the audacity to accept a 193 percent pay raise from $132,443 in 2017 to $388,095 in 2024. This despite the fact that abortions rose 30 percent from 862,000 in 2017 to 1,124,000 in 2024. A standard 3.5 percent raise compounded over 7 years would be 36.29 percent. Her raise is over 5 times the average raise despite repeated failures. On 9/17/22 Lila Rose stated the following "Here's the truth, before June of this year Americans had an excuse for why we had not ended the barbaric and evil practice of human abortion. We could simply say the Supreme Court says we can't our hands are tied. That excuse is now gone. Now if we fail to save the youngest children from the cold death of the abortionists' tools that failure is on us. It's on all of us in this room. I agree. It's on Lila. 23 years. Millions in compensation. Tens of millions in donations. And support for abortion is at its highest levels ever. Instead of accountability Lila accepts pay raises amounting to 193 percent. Her 23 years of failure, her shameless grifting, her misrepresentation of her objective results, and her total lack of accountability are unbecoming of a leader. She should resign in shame. #ResignLilaRose

"The very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts....Fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.- West Virginia Board of Education vs Barnette Now do abortion.

@Nick_Reynosa @JesseHughes "lol", because you and I are both aware OT Israel did not live in a legislative representative democracy.

I would like to debate @JesseHughes on the question, "Should Christians engage in loyalty politics?" I will take the negative. I am pretty open in late May.

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes Why do you support voting on inalienable rights 50 different times when the Constitution prohibits "legislative democratic majorities" from voting on inalienable rights.

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes If your position is scriptural where in scripture does it say Christian are required to live in a legislative representative democracy?

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes Would you publicly debate why Abolitionists will put the pre-born rights up to a state committee vote but not do the same for their own 2nd Amendment rights?

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes Would you be willing to publicly debate how a state level Abolitionist bill can be effective if women have a superseding Constitutional right to travel?

@secularprolife Prison sentences for individuals who pay for violence is not about "punishing women" it's about providing justice and deterrence for whom the violence is committed to (half of whom are female fetuses)

Pro-lifers aren't interested in punishing men or women. We're interested in protecting children.

What's with the "lol". Your strategy is advocating for 50 different state level Abolitionist bills. You say this is obedience to God. If this strategy is scriptural. If it's scriptural, shouldn't we also see the same strategy in scripture? Am I missing something? Or you don't want to debate your strategy?

@Nick_Reynosa @JesseHughes Probably not lol

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes Would you be willing to publicly debate, "Christian who support states rights and federalism support moral relativism"?

@nathanweisser @JesseHughes Would you be willing to publicly debate "Should Christians vote on inalienable human rights"?

@thoughtsofquod @secularprolife Its ridiculous because the questioner would never tolerate that kind of ageism if the victims were born women. It's an obvious gynocentric double standard.

@Nick_Reynosa @secularprolife Not a ridiculous question for the babies that would die or not die

If an organization opposed abortion after 21 weeks but supported earlier abortions, would you be willing to work with them publicly to outlaw the later abortions? Why or why not?

@WhiteBabyFac Her eyes are on the screen, not her child...

In response to a question at the recent TPUSA campus event with Erika Kirk, Karoline Leavitt explained what her day-to-day life as a career woman and mother looks like. She said that she misses most mornings with her toddler son because he sleeps late. Some mornings if he's up early enough, she's able to get him a bottle and get him breakfast. She rushes off to her high-pressure White House job early in the morning, and often doesn’t see her son again until bedtime. If you're wondering if she spent more time with him when he was an infant, after his birth she took just 3-4 days off before returning to work. Now she's telling young women that they should also do both - career and motherhood - because it's so refreshing to come home from a long stressful day at work to her son who is always so happy to see her. Do you think Karoline is a good role model for young conservative Christian women? It's a no for me.

Brown v Board, Loving V Virginia, West Virginia Board of Education vs Barnette and on and on. America's history of inalienable rights has often been in defiance of the popular vote and not because of it. The answer to our abortion Holocaust is in plain sight if people are willing to see it.

Hot take: we don't vote on human rights. Ever. They're not granted by popular vote, but by God.

@ksude7 It depends on how much reading they've done. Another factor is how much tribalism and careerism is present in their lives. These forces can be powerful in blocking out cognitive dissonance.

Would conservatives realize if they were practicing Marxists?

"A woman by her nature is fitted for home-work"- Pope Leo XIII Rerum Novarum 1891 "The corruption of the feminine nature that occurs when mothers work outside the home to the neglect of their families"- Pope Pius XI Casti Connubii 1930 "It is an intolerable abuse for mothers to forced into gainful occupations outside the home... Mothers work should be in the home or it's immediate vicinity"-Pope Pius XI Quadragesimo Anno 1931 "It is wrong for mothers to take up paid work if it contradicts or hinders their primary mission as mothers"-Pope John Paul II Laborem Exercens 1981

@LilaGraceRose Um, why? You reject sola Scriptura.

We don’t want to be “trad” or “girl boss,” we want to be Proverbs 31

@yaf @sgruber91 Seth Gruber is a shameless careerist who tries to have both ways on MAGA. He says "Christ is King". But when the chips were down MAGA was his King. He's also a coward who blocks people who call him out for it.

🗣️@sgruber91 “Those who murder the unborn cannot be trusted to govern the born.”