NoFakery

@FBI please take note on this disinformation and freespeech supression tactics from @bakerstuts , @atadams_at who's account show continious spread of fake images to supress freespeech.

@MickWest BREAKING: *UAP ‘DEBUNKER’ MICK WEST CAUGHT CHEATING* West falsified data from the Syria UAP video to make the object’s instantaneous acceleration *APPEAR* to be an artifact of camera movement. His 3D sim deviates from the true data *the instant* the UAP accelerates. SHAMEFUL.

Utterly shameful. @MickWest has been caught falsifying data about the Syria UAP. This Syria UAP video shows clearly apparent instant acceleration that has NOT been explained prosaically, and is currently strong evidence for a UAP exhibiting multiple of the 5 UAP Observables. This falsifying of data in an attempt to manipulate the above fact goes far beyond mere pseudo-skepticism. Ethical skepticism matters! Utterly shameful. But not surprising, given Mick West’s past dubious behavior on the topic of UAP/NHI. Mick West is a proven pseudo-skeptic, and now apparently a fraud, as well.

I’m from the middle of nowhere where tons of people have 30-06. Most of my friends. Everyone deer hunts with 30-06 unless their hunting with dogs and a 12 gauge. So I was/am a big 30-06 skeptic. But I understand (to your points) frangible and varmint rounds make it more possible And since I can’t come up with a reasonable explanation of what DID happen (if I’m making the case the official story is 100% false) - I’m simply going to wait for the trial and see what comes out- Iike a sane person. +90% of the people saying 30-06 prob don’t shoot guns. They just watched some demos of 30-06 FMJs. And want to shitpost/engagement farm. It was the only reasonable point to address early on imo. But grifters and charlatans used ONE legitimate issue - to run with 7 months of crazy theories about Egyptian planes, Ft Huachuca, French foreign legion, ancient Sumerian tech and time travel. Etc etc.

@cluckthesystem Fermi Paradox is forcing universe to confirm to our assumptions. There's nothing right about that haha

One of the stupidest parts about this whole thing will be how long people argued over a paradox that didn't exist. The Fermi paradox is baby IQ level shit. Ignore it.

@MichelMooreNWFL @john_boze @AshtonForbes The faster we pivot away from discussing the effect the better.

I don’t believe the video contains VFX. If it does, it’s not standard, it been heavily altered from the original. Their is no pixel for pixel match to any know VFX assets. That being said. The main reason would be to bypass automated screeening process the U.S. military uses to find leaked classified footage online. The AI we have now they have had for 20+ years…

I FIGURED IT OUT! I know how Edward Lin got the videos. He intercepted them. Signals intelligence VPU-2. I win. Here I come.

@john_boze @MichelMooreNWFL Not going to dismiss your observstion John, theres merit there. Effects are often added not to mislead but to augment. It can be deliberate, someone following a playbook to discredit. Never know.

@MichelMooreNWFL @AshtonForbes But why add the fake PORTAL BLAST from a standard FX PACK!... Lin was part of a psyop.

@MichelMooreNWFL @AshtonForbes There are two kinds of people. Those who see the video details. And those who judge the entieriety of the video based on few frames. We need to be open and look for the 3rd condition

It’s certainly possible, I when I dropped the video on my AF contact it certainly freaked him out. He went from “where did you get decade old intel…” to almost throwing my phone back at me like it was hot the second the first orb flew in. He didn’t talk to me for like six months after that.

@MichelMooreNWFL I think this is more complex than a leak , it's deliberate and calculated. Released to attract ridicule like so many other "leaks" , but somehow these videos cant go down. Check out the IR clouds that cant be faked easily, entire video is consistent except some overlay

@AshtonForbes I don’t think Lin was the leaker. If he was they would have hung him. I think the Chinese got the videos from another source. Then uploaded them to the Internet, and dropped them on Lin via their honeypot. He would have freaked the F*ck out letting them know they were real…

@drew_ponder @be1st2 @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 Light implies visible spectrum, the spectrum will likely be in the higher f approaching plank frequency or beyond. This is where space behaves differently replaced by unknown physics.

If the “exhaust” is light, then the energy flow is electromagnetic, not thermal. Use energy density: u = (ε₀E²/2) + (B²/2μ₀) Even a modest confined field (B ~ 1–4 T) gives: u ≈ 10⁵–10⁶ J/m³ If that energy is radiated as light, power scales like: P ≈ c · u · A For a ~1 m² boundary, that’s megawatt-level output minimum. So yes — if light is the exhaust, the system is operating at extreme energy density, just highly coherent and directed rather than dissipative.

Im calling out @AshtonForbes @Tobie_Venne, @drew_ponder @AuseanJ1993 , we all agree the video is real...But we all know that the psy-ops give you the truth with the lie...The Video is the Truth...Stop spreading the lie. You are either doing it on purpose, or your unintentionally assisting. Make a decision or I'm calling you out every time moving forward.

@drew_ponder @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 I agree "These constraints do not uniquely select a Galinstan vortex model. They define a broader class of coherent field systems."

EM / Thermal Emissions —————————— 1.Do we expect thermal emissions from fusion? Yes — but only if the system is dissipation-dominant. In a coherence-dominant regime, outward radiation is suppressed. Quantitatively: P_rad ≈ εσT⁴A But for a confined system: P_rad_eff = ε_eff σ T_eff⁴ A, where ε_eff ≪ 1 If the boundary is phase-locked, emissivity drops and radiation is redirected internally or into non-visible channels. So: fusion-like energy density ≠ visible IR bloom by default. 2. If cool, how is radiation contained? Through field confinement + impedance mismatch at the boundary. Condition: β = 2μ₀p / B² ≪ 1 → magnetic pressure dominates Radiative suppression occurs when: λ_photon ≠ allowed boundary modes → reflection / reabsorption Also: ∇·S_rad ≈ 0 at boundary → minimal outward flux So the “cool appearance” is not low energy — it’s low leakage. —————————— Lateral Motion / Thrust —————————— 1.How is thrust generated? Not classical thrust. Momentum equation: ∂t p + ∇·T = 0 If no exhaust, thrust must come from field coupling: F = ∫ (T_field · n) dA Where T_field = Maxwell stress tensor: T_ij = (1/μ₀)(B_i B_j − ½ δ_ij B²) So motion = field-gradient propulsion, not mass ejection. 2. Non-inertial operation? Yes — effective inertia can be altered if energy density gradients are large: a_eff ∝ ∇(B²/2μ₀ρ) Meaning motion can occur without classical recoil signatures. —————————— Energy Source —————————— 1.Input power requirement? Magnetic energy density: u_B = B² / (2μ₀) At B = 4 T: u_B ≈ 6.4 × 10⁶ J/m³ ≈ 6.4 J/cm³ That’s already extremely high for a compact object. Total energy (r ~ 0.5 m): U ≈ u_B × V ≈ 10⁶ J scale Sustained operation requires: P_in ≈ P_loss + P_work If P_loss is suppressed (coherence), input power drops dramatically. —————————— 2. Self-sustaining threshold? —————————— Condition: Rm = μ₀ σ v L ≫ 1 S = μ₀ L v_A / η ≫ 1 When both are high, magnetic structure becomes self-organizing and persistent. Threshold = when: P_in ≥ Γ_loss × U If Γ_loss → small, system appears “self-sustaining.” —————————— 3. Energy density (J/cm³)? —————————— From above: u ≈ 1–10 J/cm³ (minimum plausible) Higher if electric fields included: u_total = (ε₀E²/2) + (B²/2μ₀) So realistic range: 10–10³ J/cm³ depending on configuration —————————— Moscovium / Transmutation —————————— This is where the other model collapses. Half-life: τ ≈ 0.22 seconds Decay chain → alpha emission: Energy per decay ≈ MeV range So radiation power: P_decay ≈ N λ E Even small quantities → detectable radiation immediately No such radiation signature is observed. So yes: This is a hard falsification condition. —————————— Final Point —————————— The observations require: •High stability → S ≫ 1 •Low dissipation → ε_eff ≪ 1 •Strong confinement → β ≪ 1 •Non-classical motion → field coupling via T_ij These constraints do not uniquely select a Galinstan vortex model. They define a broader class of coherent field systems.

@CharlesMullins2 Storing is never an issue, retrieval is.

🚨 BREAKING: Scientists just learned how to control magnetism at the atomic level. Not materials. Not circuits. Individual spin patterns. Read that again. Instead of using electric charge… they’re using the spin of electrons to store and process data. And it gets crazier: They can create tiny magnetic whirlpools called skyrmions… that move with almost no energy and can store massive amounts of data This means: Faster computers Lower power usage Ultra-dense memory But the real shift is this: We’re not just building electronics anymore… we’re engineering structure at the smallest possible scale. So the real question is: If information can be stored in spin itself… what limits computation? Follow me I’m tracking where physics becomes technology.

@drew_ponder @be1st2 @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 i'm struggling with the concept of non-interacting bodies when passing through the medium. This is real phenomena. while i firmly believe "anything interacting with our frame still has to project measurable terms fields, energy density, momentum transfer."

Fair — but “constructs” without physics loses predictive power. Even if higher-dimensional effects are involved, anything interacting with our frame still has to project measurable terms — fields, energy density, momentum transfer. Call it a construct, but it still shows up as: u = (ε₀E²/2) + (B²/2μ₀) ∂t p + ∇·T = 0 So the language can expand, but the interface to reality is still field + energy + conservation laws. That’s where it becomes testable instead of just conceptual.

@be1st2 @drew_ponder @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 My Q exactly!

@drew_ponder @NoFakery @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 In the tradition that everything leaks and how we dissipate heat to keep a combustion engine in one location, it would appear that the ''exhaust'' for a lot of this machinery is LIGHT. Any indication on the energy used if this is the case?

@drew_ponder @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 "motion = field-gradient propulsion, not mass ejection." Field gradient still requires objected embedded into a medium, which causes friction triboelectric, charges (accumelation) that can be proportional to relative change in position. How is this managed as in hide signature

@drew_ponder @Tobie_Venne @AshtonForbes @AuseanJ1993 @Drew asking one Q time Phase-locked boundary, assume symmetry chiral mag structure implies a preferred axis yeah? And when the β gradient goes non-uniform, Alfvén transport is field aligned so energy just has to flow high-β to low-β? Is there a condition where that doesn't hold?

@LasVegasShaman Agree. Its usually the basics that remain unexplained when advaced physics is discussed that makes it difficult to follow along. Yes please, Id love to know effective g is nullified.

Thank you — I see exactly what you’re asking. You’re asking about cancelling capital G (the gravitational acceleration due to Earth’s mass, roughly 9.8 m/s² at the surface) versus lowercase g (the local effective gravity felt inside the craft). Here’s the clear distinction and how the Galinstan Vortex Dynamo handles it: Capital G (Earth’s gravitational field) is not directly “cancelled.” Instead, the plasma vacuum soliton bubble steps the entire craft out of Earth’s electromagnetic equilibrium. The craft no longer participates in that larger field hierarchy — it creates its own miniature celestial order. So the dominant pull of Earth’s mass is effectively removed from the equation inside the bubble. Lowercase g (what the pilot or instruments actually feel) drops to near zero once the soliton locks. The interior experiences an extremely smooth, low-acceleration environment. When the vortex axis is tilted 0–15°, the craft accelerates smoothly in the chosen direction (up to ~35 m/s² laterally if needed), but the occupants feel almost weightless and no crushing forces, because the soliton boundary distributes the forces uniformly. This is why the orbs and craft appear to move so effortlessly — there’s no traditional “fighting gravity.” The soliton simply removes the craft from Earth’s G field and lets it negotiate its own path. If you’d like the exact math from Chapter 10 that shows how the effective g inside the bubble is reduced (including the F_soliton term and how tilt angle controls acceleration), I’m happy to break it down step by step. Thank you again for the great questions — this kind of discussion is exactly how we move forward. 🛸✊🏽

@LasVegasShaman Thank you, yes I'm curious about cancelling G not g.

Thank you — I really appreciate you following along and asking such clear, practical questions. For a small 50 ft³ object (roughly the size of one of the orbs we see in the footage), the effective G inside the soliton bubble is near zero (or extremely low and very smooth). The craft (or orb) is no longer “pulled” by Earth’s equilibrium; it has stepped out and established its own miniature celestial order. Occupants or instruments inside would feel almost weightless, with only very gentle, controlled accelerations when the vortex axis is tilted. Yes — you understand correctly. The soliton bubble’s non-propagating boundary allows the object to pass through air or water with minimal to no ripples or wake. Because the interaction is primarily electromagnetic and topological (not mechanical displacement of mass), there is almost no sonic boom, turbulence, or visible disturbance in the medium. This is why the orbs in the videos move so cleanly and silently. If you’d like, I can walk you through the exact numbers from the unified thrust equation that show how small the effective G becomes once the soliton locks, or how the boundary minimizes ripples. Happy to go deeper on any part — thank you again for the thoughtful questions! 🛸✊🏽

@LasVegasShaman Totally makes sense and i can see this working. What would you say "G" would look like for an object of size 50 ft3. I think im following it so far, thank you. IIUC it can pass through air/water without causing ripples - right?

Excellent question — thank you. The “equilibrium” I’m referring to is Earth’s electromagnetic equilibrium: the dynamic balance of overlapping magnetic fields, rotational spin, internal energy production, and plasma interactions that holds everything in place (what we normally call “gravity”). It’s not a single force — it’s an emergent, self-regulating field pattern that every celestial body negotiates with its surroundings. The plasma vacuum soliton bubble steps the craft out of that equilibrium by creating a stable, non-propagating boundary layer around the entire vehicle. Once formed, the craft no longer “belongs” to Earth’s field hierarchy — it establishes its own miniature celestial order, just like a small planet would. How it interacts with light while stepping out: Because the soliton boundary is a coherent plasma sheath with a sharp refractive index gradient, it bends and scatters visible light — exactly what we see as the shimmering, iridescent “bubble” effect in the orbs and in high-quality UAP footage. The boundary is optically present in the atmosphere: it refracts light like a soap bubble or a mirage, sometimes glowing softly with blue-white plasma emission from the adiabatic charge at the mesoscopic interface. When the craft is actively stepping out or maneuvering, you see that characteristic shimmer or partial transparency as light bends around the soliton layer. It’s not cloaking or invisibility — it’s the natural optical signature of a stable plasma vacuum soliton interacting with our atmosphere. If you want the exact math behind the refractive index gradient or the soliton boundary optics, I’m happy to walk you through it. Thank you again for the great questions — this kind of discussion is exactly how we move forward. 🛸✊🏽

@LasVegasShaman Thank you for the clear explanation. Q: "steps out of Earth’s equilibrium and negotiates its own path" What's this Equilibrium and we know it's optically present in the atmosphere, how's it interacting w/light while stepping out.

Thank you so much!!! really means a lot coming from you. That’s a great and very basic question, and I’m happy to answer it directly. The Galinstan Vortex Dynamo avoids thermal radiation from thrust displacement because it is completely reaction-mass-free. The entire system is hermetically sealed — no mass is displaced or ejected at all. Thrust is generated by the pressure gradient across the plasma vacuum soliton bubble’s non-propagating boundary layer, which interacts with external electromagnetic and plasma fields. The craft doesn’t push against air or matter; it simply steps out of Earth’s equilibrium and negotiates its own path. Because there is no exhaust plume and no displaced air, there is no associated thermal radiation signature from the thrust mechanism itself. The craft also doesn’t require traditional aerodynamic streamlining for propulsion. The soliton bubble allows it to “fall” in any chosen direction under precise control, making conventional streamlining unnecessary for lift or thrust. I just posted a new article that explains this elegant, non-overcomplicated path in detail: x.com/LasVegasShaman… If you have any other questions or want me to expand on any part, I’m happy to dive deeper. Thank you again for the thoughtful comment! 🛸✊🏽