Renee DiResta

33.3K posts

Renee DiResta banner
Renee DiResta

Renee DiResta

@noUpside

📖 Invisible Rulers: The People Who Turn Lies Into Reality Studies adversarial abuse @ Georgetown. Prev SIO, tech, Jane Street 🦹🏻‍ Twitter Files bette noir

agentsofinfluence.substack.com Katılım Mart 2009
1.5K Takip Edilen67.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
This morning Jacob Siegel manufactured a controversy to gin up sales for his error-riddled book; he admits as much in the article he wrote for @TheFP, where he plays victim and pretends that a correction is cEnsoRsHiP. He says I "didn't deny" asking The Baffler to pull its review of my book but I absolutely fucking do lol. And I did on the phone with an editor for The Free Press this afternoon. Somehow, Jacob's email to me demanding my emails with other publications was supposed to serve as its own factcheck. Here's what actually happened: "Corrections Are Censorship: Jacob Siegel’s Latest Fiction" reneediresta.substack.com/p/corrections-…
Renee DiResta tweet media
English
11
13
99
45.7K
Renee DiResta retweetledi
Lawfare
Lawfare@lawfare·
The Pentagon’s post-2022 influence playbook has traded bots for ad- buys. @NoUpside explores how a new generation of Pentagon information operations, which relies on paid promotions for social media posts, is reaching people.
Lawfare tweet media
English
1
3
5
2.3K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
I wrote about this issue back in 2018, as it was first emerging. Predatory grifters have been pushing this for a long time now -- this did not happen overnight. A combination of terrible incentives, fear, coddling antivax bullshit, and authoritative voices not understanding how to compete in the modern information environment got us here. wired.com/story/the-comp…
Renee DiResta tweet media
ProPublica@propublica

New: Babies who don’t get the vitamin K shot are 81 times more likely to develop severe bleeding. In many cases, oxygen can’t reach their brains and blood pools around their skulls. Yet driven by misinformation, more parents are refusing the injection. propub.li/42PRfyl

English
0
3
11
1.1K
Renee DiResta retweetledi
Lawfare
Lawfare@lawfare·
In March and April, the Trump Justice Department settled two high-profile Biden-era cases involving allegations of government pressure on social and conservative media. @NoUpside cuts through the noise surrounding them to explain what the resulting consent decrees actually established.
Lawfare tweet media
English
1
4
5
3.7K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
The Murthy v Missouri consent decree wasn't a win, despite the spin out of Eric Schmitt et al. The language is very clear: "shall not be construed as evidence or as an admission regarding any issues of law or fact, or regarding the truth or validity of any allegation or claim raised in this action or in any other action." This piece explains what the settlement *actually* limits, what it allows, and explains why Missouri and the Twitter Files pushers keep lying about it (tl;dr: its main value is political collateral for a narrative).
Lawfare@lawfare

In March and April, the Trump Justice Department settled two high-profile Biden-era cases involving allegations of government pressure on social and conservative media. @NoUpside cuts through the noise surrounding them to explain what the resulting consent decrees actually established.

English
1
0
4
1.1K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
This is the best one so far
ADIN@ADINresearch

Had a Jane Street interview in 2014 Round 7. Interviewer says 'meet me at Washington Square Park, southwest corner, 2 PM.' I show up. He's playing chess with a guy who's clearly hustling tourists. Interviewer's losing badly. Without looking up he says, 'Take my position.' I sit down. The chess hustler looks at me and grins. 'Your boy owes me $40. You covering his position?' I look at the interviewer. He nods. 'Assume the debt,' he says. 'Now optimize.' I study the board. I'm down a queen and two rooks. Completely hopeless. 'This position is unwinnable,' I say. 'Correct. Now make it profitable.' 'What?' The chess hustler is getting impatient. 'You playing or what, kid?' The interviewer slides me a $20. 'Market make this game.' I'm confused. 'How do I market make chess?' 'Bid-ask on the number of moves until checkmate. Hustler takes the under, you take the over. Spread is your edge.' I look at the position again. Maybe 8 moves max until I'm mated. 'I bid 12 moves, offer 15,' I announce. The hustler laughs. 'I'll take the under on 12 all day.' 'Done,' says the interviewer. 'You're now short volatility on a deterministic outcome.' Three moves later I'm checkmated. I owe the hustler $40 plus my $20 bet. 'How confident were you in that 12-move bid?' the interviewer asks. '0.95,' I say, because that's what you always say. '0.95 huh?' He chuckles. 'You just sold insurance on the Titanic.' He stands up. 'The real trade was shorting your confidence and going long on the hustler's experience. You missed the obvious hedge: offering chess lessons to tourists at $25/hour while the game played out.' 'But I don't know how to play chess well enough to teach.' 'Exactly. That's called selling vol you don't have. Very Jane Street.' Offer rescinded. Reason: 'Failed to recognize that the park itself was the market and the pigeons were the only rational actors.'"

English
2
15
520
396.6K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
@Darondo5eva Still with the FuNded bY PeTer ThiEl conspiracies 🙄 Another BlueAnon nutjob pissed that SF is no longer run by incompetents. Stay mad.
English
0
0
1
39
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
The Free Press let a whiner have 2000 words to spin nonsense about his book review being cEnSoreD -- supposedly, by me. They promoted the narrative heavily. When they were shown emails proving this narrative was bs, they chose to ignore them -- protecting their friend and their story at the expense of the facts. agentsofinfluence.substack.com/p/i-was-falsel…
Renee DiResta tweet media
English
1
3
20
1.8K
Renee DiResta retweetledi
Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️)
New in Nature Human Behaviour: How Deceptive Online Networks Reached Millions in the US 2020 Elections -Reached at least 37M Facebook and 3M Instagram users -3 networks out of 49 responsible for >70% of users reached -Exposed users older, more conservative
Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) tweet mediaBrendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) tweet mediaBrendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) tweet mediaBrendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) tweet media
English
4
29
79
7.3K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
As for people “questioning the legitimacy of the endeavor itself” — it’s been literally 3 years of investigations and no one has found any evidence of maSs cEnsOrShiP or wrongdoing. Jacob’s book is a rewarmed essay from 3 years ago, maybe you haven’t been paying attention to everything that’s happened since.
English
1
0
0
127
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
Blah blah blah projection. He did criticize; and when he crossed the line into bullshitting, I requested a correction. The crash out here is from the man who wrote 3000 words of innuendo and still got the first ones wrong. The person not immune to critique here is *him*. He wrote a book that’s full of mistakes and strung-together innuendo. Ask him about how he made fun of Benz and Shellenberger for the ‘hurr durr CIA’ conspiracizing before doing it himself. No one tried to censor 22 million tweets — glad we all agree! — so what’s this “largest censorship machine in existence” that I became “the leader” of lol? What did I do with Ham68 exactly? Make him say the thing. 😂 He’s lying to you all with innuendo. And as for factual errors there are dozens in the book. I’ll send his publisher the errata, don’t worry.
Renee DiResta tweet media
English
1
0
0
146
Jacob Siegel
Jacob Siegel@Jacob__Siegel·
Renee DiResta's attacks on my book THE INFORMATION STATE are based on outright falsehoods and prevarications. I documented the numerous errors and distortions she uses to deflect scrutiny from her public record, along with the primary source evidence that shows the claims are false.
Jacob Siegel tweet media
English
4
22
129
35.5K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
If you don’t see the difference between *helped lead* and what Jacob clearly meant by “came to lead” (singular) in his paranoid conspiracy procedural there, then you’re one of the rubes he’s writing for. Lap it up. That fantasy June meeting he writes about also never happened btw.
English
0
0
0
71
Cynthia
Cynthia@Cynthia31441378·
@noUpside @Jacob__Siegel You literally wrote 'I helped lead the EIP." You seemed quite anxious, at the time, to claim all the credit. Are you suggesting you yourself are guilty of disinformation? Physician, heal thyself!
English
1
0
5
123
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
What’s curious is that objecting to Jacob’s inflated bullshit is seen as odd. I am very *proud* of my work on EIP which is why I say I *helped lead* it in many places. Siegel’s error-riddled book wanted a single villain “leader” — so he spun up a bunch of innuendo and still got it wrong.
English
1
0
0
142
Aimee Terese
Aimee Terese@aimeeterese·
@noUpside @Jacob__Siegel It’s curious that people like this seem to think leadership implies a credential for one’s resume and nothing more, acting as if they’re being unjustly persecuted in response to basic expectations that they take responsibility for their actions at the helm of an organisation.
English
1
0
9
131
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
@annbauerwriter @walterkirn You’ve told this lie multiple times. Last time I demanded it “on behalf of the president”. Where is it? What did it say? I blocked you in 2022 because I thought you were a nut after you picked a fight with me about some Weinstein thing.
Renee DiResta tweet mediaRenee DiResta tweet media
English
0
0
0
61
Jonathan Leaf
Jonathan Leaf@WriterJonLeaf·
@noUpside @Jacob__Siegel I just finished reading the book. It's a historical chronicle. It describes many acts and a variety of trends. That passage does not accuse you of censorship. You should read the passage again. You should read the book and reflect.
English
1
0
5
60
Jacob Siegel
Jacob Siegel@Jacob__Siegel·
I'm not interested in litigating this any further and would like to move on. But I think it's significant that major publications will blithely censor speech at the behest of people who are this brazenly dishonest. Read THE INFORMATION STATE for the story of how we got here. us.macmillan.com/books/97812503…
Jacob Siegel@Jacob__Siegel

As evidence of the alleged errors in my book, Renee DiResta claims: "He wrote that I led EIP, but I was on maternity leave for the first six weeks of the project.” I provide three examples of DiResta referring to herself as a leader of the EIP. jsiegel.substack.com/p/a-last-word-…

English
4
10
93
12.6K
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
@walterkirn The conspicuous lack of acknowledgement of the email refuting the book review censorship premise is noted.
English
0
0
4
105
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
Yes indeed. Did you ever stop to think, Walter, that mine was assigned to me by your friends? They made the cinematic universe with the fake statistics. You, like Siegel, acknowledged to me that Benz is full of shit. What was the source for all of this, do you want to tell the readers? theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Renee DiResta tweet media
English
2
0
2
154
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
Then if it was just classifying them after the election, Jonathan, how did it do a mass censorship? Jacob wrote my super secret CIA girl character sketch quite intentionally to elevate me to single-leader status. I also didn’t work on Ham68 or run project Birmingham…and Jonathon Morgan wasn’t my coauthor on the Senate report lol. The book tried to hard to create its villain and got sloppy. You’re excusing it because you want to believe.
English
1
0
0
71
Jonathan Leaf
Jonathan Leaf@WriterJonLeaf·
@noUpside @Jacob__Siegel That you co-led a group rather than exclusively leading it is a minor point, don't you think? And the book says EIP was "classifying" 22 million tweets as misinformation, not censoring them. You have problems either with telling the truth or looking in the mirror. It seems both.
English
1
0
4
62
Renee DiResta
Renee DiResta@noUpside·
@Jacob__Siegel You used that ridiculous word yourself lol. I didn’t, because your claims were false. Not true and inconvenient. Your review wasn’t censored. Update your post.
Renee DiResta tweet media
English
0
0
1
188
Jacob Siegel
Jacob Siegel@Jacob__Siegel·
In a word, DiResta accuses me of malinformation, which means that what I have written is true, but not to her liking. That is the essence of her argument; the rest is a collection of insults, deflections, and prevarications. Its purpose is to dictate how journalists and other commentators are allowed to cover a public figure.
Jacob Siegel@Jacob__Siegel

Renee DiResta's attacks on my book THE INFORMATION STATE are based on outright falsehoods and prevarications. I documented the numerous errors and distortions she uses to deflect scrutiny from her public record, along with the primary source evidence that shows the claims are false.

English
2
6
54
5.7K