Noël Alejandro Bota

J1-P58 carriers had a mix of EHG/CHG. "We observed a contrast between the Levant and Arabia: Levantines have excess EHG ancestry (Figure 1E), which we showed previously had arrived in the Levant after the Bronze Age along with people carrying ancient south-east European and Anatolian ancestry (Haber et al., 2017, 2020). Our results here show this ancestry is much higher in the Levant compared to Arabia (Table 1). Another contrast between the Levant and Arabia is the excess of African ancestry in Arabian populations. We found that the closest source of African ancestry for most populations in our dataset is Bantu Speakers from Kenya, in addition to contributions from Nilo-Saharan speakers from Ethiopia. We estimate that African admixture in the Middle East occurred within the last 2,000 years, with most populations showing signals of admixture around 500–1,000 years ago (Figure S1; Table S1), in agreement with previous studies (Hellenthal et al., 2014)." #fig1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Well said.

Y-DNA data for all 36 Jomon males sequenced to date.

Are you ready????

If death is guaranteed, wtf are you afraid of, bro? Take that risk.

Ridiculous. There is no proof the Sumerians were Turks. That is nationalism, not science. And I say that as a "spawn" of the Xiongnu-Sarmatians.

Lana Del Rey: "I pray for Palestine every day. Watching the innocent lives taken by war criminals is so hard..."

Treason doesn't describe it.

I am an American Christian. Iran is my friend, the Epstein class is my enemy.

Formation of zagrosian neolithic population, from earlier paleolithic ancestries simplified

Yes.

Semitic is Afro-Asiatic. It formed BEFORE the Bronze Age. All studies state that these Y-DNA's were the result of Northern assimilation. You cannot fool me when I know the facts. Swallow your pride and accept the data.

The purpose of which is to maintain geopolitical boundaries and the status quo. It is simply convenient to assign these anachronistic categories. It keeps people compliant and suppresses the politically unwanted elements.

By alienating the E1b1b native from its own Afro-Asiatic language, Semitic, the colonial European and the Bronze Age descendants usurp the language by portraying it as "Near Eastern" when it is really "African". Meanwhile, the NearEastern origin of PIE is misrepresented as Euro.

The preference for "R1a = Aryan" and "J1 = Arabian" are simply modern misunderstandings of origin. These simple misunderstandings are perpetuated by those with a political agenda and haplogroup-narcissism. Many research studies are spearheaded by political funding.

Think of it this way: Proto-Indo-European came from Proto-Indo-Anatolian. R1 EHGs brought the "European" element, but J1/J2 North Mesopotamians brought the "Indo-Anatolian" structure. E-Semites were reshaped by Jmen, which is why Semitic shares Hurrian and Indo-Anatolian words.

J1 seeded your people late: Bronze Age. Not before. So really many J1-Arabs are "Iranian" in oldest origin, but not all Iranians are "Arab" or J1.

Yes, Netanyahu is NOT genetically Jewish on his Y-DNA. R1a is an Eastern Hunter Gatherer group. However, J1's origins are Zagros-Caucasus where they developed the foundation for the Proto-Indo-European language. R1 was nowhere near here. E1b1b already developed Semitic.