NOETIC RESET☦️

642 posts

NOETIC RESET☦️ banner
NOETIC RESET☦️

NOETIC RESET☦️

@NoeticReset

Reason with God-Isa 1:18 Give an answer-1 Pet 3:15 Test all things-1 Thess 5:21 Contend for the faith-Jude 1:3 Destroy arguments-2 Cor 10:5 & Baptize-Matt 28:18

is in Church! Katılım Aralık 2025
181 Takip Edilen58 Takipçiler
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
Jatta, M.D.
Jatta, M.D.@md_jatta·
One thing you can always rely on with “Maliq” is intellectual unseriousness. One day he’s regurgitating dusty early-2000s Dawah talking points, and the next he’s cosplaying as some balanced, above-the-fray Muslim moderator. It’s all performative. He’s basically the Piers Morgan of the X Dawah-sphere, clickwhoring whatever is most inflammatory, contradictory, or stupid, so long as it keeps both sides in the comments. My prayer for you is that you become sincere with yourself.
Maliq@MasterMaliq

Christians refuse to accept Muhammad as a true prophet of God, not even as a messenger, not even as a good man who brought guidance. Yet in the same breath, they demand that Muslims believe in the Trinity. They demand that we accept the divinity of Jesus. They demand that we confess Jesus is God Himself, not a prophet, not a messenger, but the Creator walking the earth in human form. They want us to believe in Paul, a man who never met Jesus in the flesh, never sat with him, never heard him teach, yet claimed the right to speak for him by default, redefining the entire message and building a new religion on his own visions. They expect us to put our faith in the Bible, a book compiled by dozens of different authors, written across centuries, edited, translated, and retranslated by human hands, with no single, unbroken chain of divine preservation. And after all that, they still want us to believe… and believe… and believe. So tell me: Why is your rejection of our Prophet non-negotiable, but our rejection of your core doctrines considered “stubbornness” or “blindness”? If you cannot accept the final messenger sent to all mankind, why should we be expected to dismantle the very foundation of Islam and rebuild it according to your creed?

English
2
5
32
1K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
Ihunanya Chi ❤️
Ihunanya Chi ❤️@Ihunanya_chi·
Last week on Godlogic live, this man left Islam, not because someone argued with him, but because he actually sat down, opened the Quran and the Bible, and read with his eyes opened. He compared both books, then went further to compare Muhammad and Jesus, and that’s when it hit him “Wait… I’ve been believing the wrong things.” Nobody preached to him o, he just used the brain God gave him. 🧠 The part that shocked me most was when he mentioned a verse in the Quran about Allah coming with clouds and angels. Then he checked the Bible and saw the same description already written about Jesus, long before the Quran existed. He was like, “Something is not right here…” basically all these titles and characteristics were stolen from the Bible and given to Allah. Mehn, I’m honestly happy for him. Bro did his research, followed truth, and made his decision. Video will be in the comment section 🍿
English
48
205
1.1K
20.9K
NOETIC RESET☦️
NOETIC RESET☦️@NoeticReset·
@ali900shahin @HanbaliChronics @MMetaphysician The laughing emoji is in response to the author of the post using laughing emojis while being ignorant of what the context of the clip was! The answer Nick gave to Jake's question is that what was being manifested is uncreated but the manifestion itself within time is created!
English
1
0
0
24
Fearless Truth
Fearless Truth@Fearless__Truth·
And we are all shocked that you were not taught first order logic in your “masters degree” get a refund gng😭😭🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Jake Brancatella@MMetaphysician

I'm shocked that neither @JayDyer nor any other prominent Eastern Orthodox apologist has attempted to defend @Fearless__Truth's statements in the debate. I guess that means that they concede that he was spewing heresy in the debate when he said that appearances of God in the Bible are created effects.

English
8
17
191
21.9K
NOETIC RESET☦️
NOETIC RESET☦️@NoeticReset·
@abdul_now @MMetaphysician Essentially y'all are trying to say there's a problem or contradiction with his model using relative identity but y'all know there isn't so now you're trying to gaslight people into thinking relative identity was made by Nick! What is the logical problem with his model??😂😂😂😂
English
2
0
12
397
Abdul Rahman (TAP)
Abdul Rahman (TAP)@abdul_now·
Calling this a “concession” is seriously desperate. All @MMetaphysician was saying is that if you “help yourself” to relative identity logic, you can dress the doctrine up in a way that avoids formal contradiction on paper within that system. That’s not the same as showing that the Trinity has actually been given a coherent solution in any serious sense, because the real issue is whether that framework itself is doing real explanatory work or whether it’s just being used as an ad hoc maneuver to shield an otherwise untenable position from contradiction. You can generate formal consistency for all kinds of absurdities if you tinker with the rules enough, but that does not suddenly make those solutions any more metaphysically serious, or the positions they’re meant to protect any less absurd. You could invent a framework in which something like “there is only one human” comes out formally consistent in some technical sense, or counts as a merely linguistic solution to a conceptual puzzle, but that would at most show that you’ve created a “way of talking” that blocks a contradiction under your chosen rules, not that you’ve said anything illuminating about reality itself or made the claim make any more sense in a way that actually matters. So congratulations on getting a bunch of symbols to behave inside your own little custom-built system. That still falls well short of showing that you’ve answered the actual problem in any important sense.
Fearless Truth@Fearless__Truth

Thanks for conceding the debate jake! Using relative identity we can make a model that is logically consistent!🥳🥳🥳

English
17
7
179
10.1K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
Fearless Truth
Fearless Truth@Fearless__Truth·
Thanks for conceding the debate jake! Using relative identity we can make a model that is logically consistent!🥳🥳🥳
English
27
32
292
33.7K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
Dr. David Wood
Dr. David Wood@Acts17David·
A terrorist attacked my school.
English
24
182
942
16.4K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
GodlyVibez Studios
GodlyVibez Studios@GVStudios_TV·
🚨GodLogic corrects a Muslim man who misuses bible scripture to say Jesus is not God😳
English
38
153
786
13.7K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
GodLogic_GL
GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL·
I asked a Muslim why he believes the Quran is from God...this was his answer... 😂😂😂
English
100
292
2.1K
52.1K
NOETIC RESET☦️ retweetledi
Jatta, M.D.
Jatta, M.D.@md_jatta·
I highly recommend that you subscribe to @TheWordandI34. You’ll truly be blessed by the content. Channel link: @thewordandi?si=sDp95YMTO_0AgG8d" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@thewordandi?s…
English
4
6
29
2.4K