James for fr33dom

3.6K posts

James for fr33dom

James for fr33dom

@NorthernConser4

Healthy, optimistic and hopeful.

Katılım Ağustos 2021
1K Takip Edilen422 Takipçiler
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
The people of Canada need to decide when enough is enough and actually do something about it!
Joseph Banks@JosephB1823

@hollyanndoan @ElectionsCan_E I am not convinced we have a democracy anymore. Elections Canada invalidated votes to support a Liberal win. MPs disenfranchise their constituents by crossing the floor. We are about to have an unelected majority. Election interference runs rampant.

English
0
0
1
2
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
@Sassygal1971 New heights of totalitarian control. New heights of Socialist destruction and poverty. New heights of Agenda 2030 to high nobody voted for.
English
0
0
0
5
Sassygal
Sassygal@Sassygal1971·
Mark Carney was installed to finish off the destruction of Canada
Sassygal tweet media
English
391
429
1.6K
17.2K
James for fr33dom retweetledi
Concerned Canadian
Concerned Canadian@Concern70732755·
Is Canada transitioning to this ?
Concerned Canadian tweet media
English
10
43
101
1.3K
Laci Knight
Laci Knight@LaciMarieKnight·
Why are the liberals determined to destroy Canada? What’s in it for them?
English
730
207
2.1K
60K
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
@BenGrahamUK When? When woke Leftist activists got into influential positions. And we all sat back and allowed them to destroy the West.
English
0
0
1
6
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK·
Britain has been a Christian nation for over 1,400 years. Through wars, plagues, and countless kings, Easter has always been celebrated. Yet now, Cadbury won’t even use the word ‘Easter’ on their eggs. When did celebrating British traditions become controversial?
Ben Graham tweet media
English
9.9K
8.6K
38.9K
4.2M
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7·
In Sweden, social services can take your children if authorities deem that you are a "religious extremist". This is very subjective and usually just means someone who is a Christian that the Socialist state doesn't like.
English
98
459
2.1K
22.4K
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
@MarkReid42 Justin signed up for Agenda 2030. Too many ignorant Canadians kept voting for him and now for Carnage not recognizing the intentional destruction of Canada. Now it's too late since Leftist Canadians are blaming Trump for what Liberals have done to their country.
English
0
0
0
14
Mark Reid 🇨🇦
Mark Reid 🇨🇦@MarkReid42·
Why do liberals and their supporters want to change Canada into a socialist regime? What was wrong with Canada before?
English
177
49
548
12.3K
James for fr33dom retweetledi
Bruce
Bruce@bruce_barrett·
Canada's war on white people. Top ten examples. Are we becoming an apartheid state? 1. Race based hiring: Public jobs and universities enforce quotas favoring visible minorities and Indigenous (research chairs, exclusive clusters). 2. Quebec tribunal: Job excluding whites dismissed as non discriminatory and ideological. 3. CBC kids show: Casting any race except Caucasian. 4. Loans and grants: 250k plus for Black entrepreneurs and immigrants. No white equivalents. 5. Two tier justice: Migrants get lighter sentences to avoid deportation. 6. Scholarships: Many for Black Indigenous BIPOC only. No white versions. 7. CBC dating site exposure: Investigated and exposed users of WhiteDate (white only supremacist linked) while ethnic apps Black Jewish Muslim Arab ignored. 8. MAiD stats: About 100k killed by MAiD and 96 percent white recipients (above population share). 9. Selective enforcement: White Lives Matter sticker on Black councillor's ad in Hamilton 2022 sparked immediate hate crime police probe. Rare for similar group messaging. 10. Media exposure leading to firing: Rachel Gilmore exposed ex Olympic bobsledder Giulio Zardo in white nationalist fight club gym. He was fired from coaching job. End race based perks or make them equal for everyone. Thoughts? 🇨🇦 Sources in comments.
Bruce tweet media
English
212
1.5K
3.9K
72.3K
Senator Babet
Senator Babet@senatorbabet·
There is a good reason why the Catholic Church forbids women from becoming priests, in her speech she says that, “there can be limited conditions under which abortion may be preferable to any available alternatives.” Under no circumstances should a person who claims to be Christian be supporting the murder of babies. Demonic.
Right To Life UK@RightToLifeUK

The Archbishop of Canterbury warns that making it no longer illegal for women to perform their own abortions for any reason up to birth is legally, morally, and practically complex, and that rushing it through as an amendment, with minimal scrutiny, would be a mistake.

English
92
211
2K
65.8K
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
The Archbishop of Canterbury is a wolf in sheep's clothing, she is an embarrassment to the Anglican Communion since she rejects basic Christian teaching and morality. She cannot even articulate a clear Christian position on the killing of children. A complete disgrace.
Samantha Smith@SamanthaTaghoy

The Archbishop of Canterbury has said that legalising DIY abortions up to the point of birth is “legally, morally, and practically complex”. It isn’t ‘complex’. It’s WRONG. Killing a 39 week old baby is morally indefensible. No Christian should find that hard to say.

English
0
0
0
9
LifeNews.com
LifeNews.com@LifeNewsHQ·
After Criticism, Archbishop of Canterbury Will Attend Vote on Abortions Up to Birth buff.ly/2WVJuIc
LifeNews.com tweet media
English
101
55
197
21.4K
The Hunter
The Hunter@the_hunter1100·
Should pork 🐖🥩 be removed!?? A. Yes B. Hell No
The Hunter tweet media
English
6.1K
305
1.1K
88.7K
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
His Majesty needs to take heed and act accordingly. Time is not a luxury at this point. Urgency is required.
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

English
0
0
0
10
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
@BishopDewar A very well written letter. Thank you for your courageous effort. We will pray for the King to respond appropriately.
English
0
0
0
4
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC
Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC@BishopDewar·
As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese
English
5.3K
17.7K
57.7K
2.1M
Marc Nixon
Marc Nixon@MarcNixon24·
Question How is it possible that Mark Carney approval rating is 63% when over 50% of Canadians can’t stand him and is sick SACRIFICING MORE.
Marc Nixon tweet media
English
2.1K
688
3.6K
84.7K
James for fr33dom
James for fr33dom@NorthernConser4·
@mark_slapinski Mark you should base your politics on policy, not on personality. There are bad actors on both sides but one ideology builds up society (Conservatives) and the other side destroys society (Leftists). Please don't be so naive.
English
3
0
2
4.3K
Mark Slapinski
Mark Slapinski@mark_slapinski·
I used to talk about Canadian politics from a Right-wing perspective. This year, I became extremely worried about Trump's behaviour. Right-wingers in my country tried to cancel me for speaking the truth, so I said "good bye."
English
71
38
316
12.5K