Rogue Trader

118 posts

Rogue Trader banner
Rogue Trader

Rogue Trader

@NotNickLeeson

An ambitious investment broker who single-handedly bankrupted one of the oldest, most important banks in Britain. L/S equity derivatives. Not financial advice.

Miami, FL Katılım Şubat 2021
144 Takip Edilen92 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
Not financial or legal advice.
Rogue Trader tweet media
English
1
0
0
207
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
Trading is hard.
Rogue Trader tweet mediaRogue Trader tweet media
English
0
0
0
28
Rogue Trader retweetledi
BankofVol Grift¹⁰⁰⁰🤖🤖¹⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰
Zero prosecution.
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue. On April 21st, the left screen moved first. I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug. At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy. On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me. At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire. Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83. I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags. My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports. The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026: Reviewed. That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one. Let me show you my flags. March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it. March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it. April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it. April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it. April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it. That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one. The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March. Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012. Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence. Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets. The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade. I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email. The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action. One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared. One account is a coincidence. But there were six. Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000. My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger. March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes. The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event. The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting." Then the White House sent the email again. I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread. I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated. But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed. Zero prosecutions. As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations. I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations. The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still. In my field, we call this price discovery.

English
0
2
8
815
Rogue Trader retweetledi
Negligible Capital
Negligible Capital@negligible_cap·
$SKM is a significantly better Anthropic proxy than $ZM. Both companies do have significant stakes in Anthropic, but SK Telecom's is much larger on both an absolute basis and relative basis. $ZM invested $51M at a $4.5B post-money valuation in Anthropic's series C round in May of 2023. $SKM invested nearly 2x the amount Anthropic did - they invested $100m at a $5B post-money valuation in a series C extension round in August of 2023 Since Series C, Anthropic has raised several other rounds - most recently they raised Series G in February of 2026 at a $380B valuation. Without getting too into the weeds on each round, accounting for dilution from each subsequent funding raise I estimate the effective percentage ownership of Anthropic for $ZM to be 0.6% and for $SKM to be about 1.07%. Since the Feb funding round at a $380B valuation, Anthropic's value has soared in the secondary markets. A few days ago the WSJ reported secondary platforms were valuing Anthropic at over $600B, rising over 60% in Q1. Business Insider also reported last week that Anthropic is actively receiving venture cap offers at an $800B valuation. Meanwhile I am told perp markets like Hyperliquid may be valuing Anthropic as high as $1T (though I haven't personally verified). So, using $800B as the valuation point for Anthropic, Zoom's 0.6% stake is worth just under $4.8B, or around a 90x return on their investment (not bad) At that same $800B valuation though, SK Telecom's 1.07% stake is worth around $8.6B, or about 85x their initial $100m investment (also not bad) Now, again without getting into the weeds, looking at $ZM and $SKM at a high level: $ZM: Market Cap: $27.1B (17.7% Anthropic) EV: $19.4B (24.7% Anthropic) $SKM: Market Cap: 14.6B (59% Anthropic) EV: $23.4B (36.8% Anthropic) So to summarize, when you buy 1 share of $ZM at $88 today, you get about $15.6 in Anthropic. When you buy one share of $SKM today at around $38 (despite shares running up over 80% YTD) you are getting $22.4 in Anthropic. Without opining on the value of the legacy businesses of Zoom and SK Telecom, one can see that SKM is a significantly better vessel to buy Anthropic exposure today than Zoom. Also if you back out the Anthropic stake of SKM in particular, the legacy business is being valued at ridiculously cheap levels (around 0.4x P/S) which is probably due to the value of the Anthropic stake not being fully realized yet rather than the value of the legacy biz dropping off a cliff. While $SKM is already up 80% YTD as the market has begun pricing the true value of their Anthropic stake, I believe it still has more room to run, especially leading up to Anthropic's IPO coming later this year, and is undoubtedly a better proxy for pure-play exposure relative to Zoom. For disclosure, I've held $SKM since mid-January and will continue to hold - not investment advice.
Negligible Capital tweet media
English
38
35
351
91.1K
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
Can someone tell #HindSet to unblock me 😂 traders so sensitive these days
Rogue Trader tweet mediaRogue Trader tweet media
English
1
0
0
38
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
@Adaamset I believe someone asked what you meant and you replied “reading is hard” 🩴
English
0
0
0
36
Adam Set
Adam Set@Adaamset·
Thousands warned, Lowest Engagement. This is how you know the Market Makers have won. This was the Low.
Adam Set tweet media
English
5
0
112
13.2K
Ellis Dillinger 💜
Ellis Dillinger 💜@EllyDtrades·
$SPY If you're thinking about adding swings you should read this first. On Monday we will be on day 4 of the rip after the cease fire deal. But the question is, can this sustain without a meaningful pull back? Declining volume coming into the chop box where traders were getting destroyed since November 2025. Ask yourself seriously if this a good place to put on risk?
Ellis Dillinger 💜 tweet media
English
7
3
71
8K
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
On today’s episode of let your winners run (r/s adjusted entry ~$20 end of 2023), which I did not:
Rogue Trader tweet media
English
0
0
0
24
Rogue Trader
Rogue Trader@NotNickLeeson·
Hands held 🤝 gains acquired 💰
Rogue Trader tweet media
English
1
0
0
212
Rogue Trader retweetledi
PaxTrader777🇺🇸
PaxTrader777🇺🇸@paxtrader777·
This is a super important clip. Most of you will ignore it………. I suggest you don’t.
English
28
87
788
39K
BankofVol Grift¹⁰⁰⁰🤖🤖¹⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰
A 75/25 reverse hedge nearly triggered at today’s close (i.e. 75% win rate). That’s 100-150% long ES exposure layered ON TOP of an existing long book. Held all session. Vanished 10 min before the bell. VIX at 31. Hormuz closed. Oil at $115. Everyone bearish. And yet. This trade happens once in a blue moon. 🌙 Someone knows something?🤔 Long is where the money gets made — sooner than anyone thinks?
BankofVol Grift¹⁰⁰⁰🤖🤖¹⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ tweet media
English
2
2
27
7.6K
Rogue Trader retweetledi
Cheeto Hunter
Cheeto Hunter@HunterOfCheetos·
How I Manage Risk - A 🧵 1) I place a hard money stop 10 points away when I enter a position. This is an "Oh Shit" insurance policy and has been hit less than 5 times in 20 years. This stop is moved once the trade shows positive expectation or the position is flattened.
English
4
5
47
7.2K