'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot

27.1K posts

'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot banner
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot

'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot

@Not_A_CultMembr

Trying to figure out how we got this far off course. Opinionated. Fighting the good fight 💪🇺🇸 🌊 NO DM’S! If you DM me it's an instant block. #VoteBlue

Floriduh Katılım Ağustos 2014
4.6K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
MM 
MM @adgirlMM·
When you hire a real estate developer as president, every acre of protected land looks like an opportunity for profit. Our national parks and forests belong to the people. We must protect our public lands for those who can't protect themselves from man's greed and destruction.
English
56
1.4K
3.3K
23K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Steve Schale
Steve Schale@steveschale·
Inject this kind of ad from Dems directly into my veins.
English
31
342
3.1K
155.6K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
David Jolly
David Jolly@davidjollyfl·
A pleasure to be in Lakeland tonight. Change doesn’t start in Tallahassee, it starts with people showing up in communities across Florida. Join us!
David Jolly tweet mediaDavid Jolly tweet mediaDavid Jolly tweet mediaDavid Jolly tweet media
English
6
105
421
3.4K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
conspiracybot
conspiracybot@conspiracyb0t·
Thomas Massie just declared: “This government is under siege.” And he exposed Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi for taking “millions of dollars from Bayer.” “All three branches of this government are under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer.” “They spent over $9 million lobbying … so that they don’t have to be liable for any damages their herbicide Roundup causes.” “The Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.” “Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution?” “The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages.” “By the way, the President’s Chief of Staff and the President’s Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that’s received millions of dollars from Bayer.” “Maybe that’s why we’ve seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority.” “And we know why they’re doing that.” “It’s to keep them from having any liability.” “This is wrong.” “We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress.”
English
313
7K
20.2K
239.5K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Aaron Regunberg
Aaron Regunberg@AaronRegunberg·
These motherfuckers are laughing at us as we pay our taxes while they make $193 million from polluting our communities and—get this—the government then gives them an extra $10 million from the tax dollars we just paid. It’s fucking robbery.
Aaron Regunberg tweet media
English
31
729
1.3K
11.7K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Senator Chris Van Hollen
Senator Chris Van Hollen@ChrisVanHollen·
4 years ago, then-Rep. Mike Waltz called on President Biden to make clear that Putin was an 'absolute war criminal.' Today, he refused to even utter those words himself. As one of Trump's top diplomats, his reversal speaks volumes.
English
180
2.2K
6K
100K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
This would be a two or three week news story in a previous administration, and might even lead to the resignation of the defense secretary. He literally fabricated a Biblical quote, based off of a movie, while pretending to be a pious Christian. But under Trump, we’ll have moved on by tomorrow.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 Hegseth recited “Ezekiel 25:17” speech at a Pentagon church service. But here’s the problem: it’s not actually from the Bible, but from Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction. He even tweaked the ending to reference a military rescue unit. Who do you think pulled it off better? Hegseth or Samuel L. Jackson?

English
296
4K
16.2K
555.1K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
J
J@jasonllevin·
J tweet media
ZXX
447
3.8K
21K
126.5K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Marco Foster
Marco Foster@MarcoFoster_·
Kyle Kulinski: “I’m so over the false equivalence. The Democrats did not kick 18M people off Medicaid, the Republicans did. The Democrats did not repeatedly cut taxes for the Epstein Class and raise it on the bottom 90%, the Republicans did. There is no both sides bad false equivalence bullshit”
English
199
1.8K
8.3K
190.8K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Masu Zafi 🔥🔥
Masu Zafi 🔥🔥@masuzafi·
🚨 Netanyahu: “This is confidential… and can’t be leaked.” Too late, Bibi. Tucker Carlson just dropped the leaked interrogation tapes exposing how Netanyahu allegedly funneled $35 million a month from Qatar to Hamas using American tax dollars as a divide-and-rule strategy to weaken the Palestinian Authority and block any peace deal.
English
353
18.4K
39.8K
1.6M
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Ralph Nader
Ralph Nader@RalphNader·
According to the Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy—a well-regarded group—the first four big tech companies to report their earnings have disclosed that they have received, collectively, $51 billion in federal tax breaks in 2025. The big four are Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Tesla. They disclosed that they reported $315 billion in U.S. profits in 2025 and “collectively paid just 4.9 percent of that amount in federal corporate income taxes—with Tesla paying exactly zero.” “These tax breaks come on top of a far larger tax benefit that these companies enjoyed last year by virtue of the 2017 Trump tax cut’s reduction in the statutory tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. The baseline amount of tax owed on these companies’ $315 billion of U.S. income in 2025 would have been $44 billion higher absent the 2017 rate cuts.” When are the American people going to organize back in their districts to focus on the tiny number of human beings to make sure all this never happens again? The 535 members of Congress. You already have, people, about 30 percent of the Congress on your side to begin with! But without organized civic lobby groups back home, the corporations are moving relentlessly to become zero federal income tax payers. Already scores of corporations pay no federal income taxes year after year. This is an outrage and there is no defense against it once people organize against their two Senators and Representatives. -R
English
34
592
1K
17.3K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Brad
Brad@BraddrofliT·
Trump bragged he graduated top of his class at Wharton… There were 366 students. He finished… wait for it… 364th. 😂
English
3.1K
14.9K
98.1K
1.8M
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
Carolina ❤️‍🔥
Carolina ❤️‍🔥@realCarola2Hope·
Daily reminder: the man who attacks the Pope has a sorceress for a spiritual adviser.
English
2K
6.3K
24.8K
755.7K
'Fucking Bitch' 🇺🇸 Real Patriot retweetledi
DulceBiatch
DulceBiatch@BiatchDulce·
Here we go again folks ⬇️ U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that a Trump's executive order requiring banks to collect citizenship information is “in process": 1. The requirement would apply to all bank customers which would require banks to collect citizenship documentation from: - New customers, and - Existing customers who already have accounts. Banks would be required to go back and obtain proof of citizenship from their entire customer base. 2. REAL IDs would not satisfy the EO standard or the requirement. REAL IDs verify identity and address, but they do not prove citizenship. 3. Passports are the primary document but the EO is focused on citizenship, including: - U.S. passports - U.S. passport cards - Birth certificates - Naturalization certificates Banks have warned that more than half of U.S. adults do not have a passport. 4. Birth certificates with different names would require additional documentation. A birth certificate proves citizenship at birth, but not current identity. If the name on the birth certificate does not match the customer’s current legal name, banks would need linking documents, such as: - Marriage certificate - Divorce decree - Court‑ordered name change - Adoption decree These documents must be certified copies. 5. Banks, industry groups and financial‑privacy experts have raised concerns about the EO: : - Millions of current bank customers could lose access to bank accounts if they cannot produce the required documents. - Rural residents, seniors, low‑income individuals, and people without passports would be disproportionately affected. - Banks would be required to store sensitive citizenship documents, creating new data‑security risks. 6. Experts have noted unresolved issues: - How citizenship data would be stored and protected - Whether federal agencies could access the information - How banks would handle customers who cannot produce documents - The cost and feasibility of verifying tens of millions of existing accounts newsweek.com/trump-executiv…
DulceBiatch tweet media
English
186
1K
960
84.9K