Never Enough Self Space

@somespells I love the short hair on her. It's so versatile.

NO WAY people are saying this hair ages her??? she looks absolutely fine to me and she’s also 29 she doesn’t have to look like a teenager all her life 😭

@BigWi111977 @KyleSharkey8 @JusticeServedTV Great interview. I am so sorry you had to go through so much to get justice for Kelsey. No this is just step one and wishing for the best for all of you!

Interview I had the pleasure of doing with @JusticeServedTV they have been here from the start and even tried to help get Kelsey home with a new scram device! They are great people! Thank you for having me on!

@suspiciousauce There are plenty of copies circling around. Rosemary has it for King and I think Johnson, Karen and the O'keefe's have it for their case... Makes me wonder if there's something that could make him liable instead of Canton/MSP. She's got claims not directly about JO, too.

@NvrEnoughSpace Probably 😂 But I am also surprised he doesnt have it - his previous attorney does.

💥NEW LINKS💥 Sorry! Technical difficulties today... CW response: #kOembba55IO9aPpd6LAKE_i5S9a8SS3Yjbz1Htz7h54" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">mega.nz/file/8FMkhQKA#… Proctors opposition: #xM5V12v2DCgT8fcY7qq7U0ecMqdwdUs5N0-ctpbQi-E" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">mega.nz/file/sIEgEATJ#…

@KyleSharkey8 @_nikki_wrongway @suspiciousauce @BrotherCounsel @BoozeyBeauty @JusticeServedTV @AttorneyMyers @GrantSmithEllis @trialchannel_ @GlammaSooz This is getting ridiculous. Obviously she's finding things to use against them related to her case. Makes me wonder if one of the DA's has something they are trying to hide. The City of Canton even has the extraction in Myles King's case & the DA agreed to that. Enough already.

@_nikki_wrongway @suspiciousauce @BrotherCounsel @BoozeyBeauty @JusticeServedTV @AttorneyMyers @GrantSmithEllis @trialchannel_ @GlammaSooz if go back a couple filings, she wants to use it suiing mass state police and the town of canton. i believe karen is currently only allowed to use it in the o'keefe civil trial

CW v Myles King CW response to Karen Reads motion for permission to use Proctors phone Link 👇 #0Vn110ZHUFtLOidSnbWmCbRv7W3w22-FcDuQfAv1USw" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">mega.nz/file/lJF1BZ7b#…

@ABeckAtlanta @Atlanta_Police There's a bunch in this article: patch.com/georgia/sandys…

@Atlanta_Police Great…now can you tell us the approximate time and location so the rest of us can AVOID the area?

@LUXURYLAW Beautiful!

And now for SOMETHING BORROWED … Thank you to Cate Blanchett who wore this Armani Prive dress in 2022 and 2025 and lent it to us from her personal archive. #styledbyLAW

@Zaphrella @BoozeyBeauty O'keefe's filed an emergency motion to get access to Karen's phones in the DA's custody, which failed & just added costs to them. Insurance covering KR & bars, I've heard. File against the House Defendants? Unlikely, imo. They'd have to admit Karen & the bars were not at fault.

@NvrEnoughSpace @BoozeyBeauty Wait, so it's Paul & Peggy? Okay so the bars may have some deepish pockets. Karen's coffer is empty. Do you think they will ever smarten up & turn on the McAlbert's for $?

Attorney Mark Diller is now paying the price, ✨️literally✨️, for misquoting Karen Read. The O’Keefe side must pay for the full forensic extraction of Karen Read’s cell phones. 💀😭 That requirement is written directly into the stipulation which was filed jointly by both parties on 3/26/26. The plaintiffs are responsible for the forensic expert, the extraction, and the associated costs. Before Karen Read even touches the phones, they are turned over to a neutral forensic examiner for a complete file system extraction. That includes deleted data, application data, system activity, and device logs. The process is documented and preserved to maintain chain of custody, and the devices are kept isolated to prevent any alteration. It also avoids anyone from incorrectly saying Read modified the phones in any way. The O’Keefe side may have a representative present to observe the extraction. But the biggest point is that, likely due to Diller’s frivolous filings (along with lying to the court about exhibit “J” and misquoting Read), the O’Keefe’s have lost any leeway on these extractions: 🔹️They do not receive the phones. 🔹️They do not receive the data. 🔹️They do not control the process. The extracted data is provided to Read’s legal team or held at their direction. Any access by the plaintiffs will require a court order or be addressed through discovery at a later stage. For those who were laughing about Karen Read flying Alan Jackson out “for nothing,” this is where that effort lands. They are paying for the extraction of phones they do not possess and data they cannot access. Kerry Roberts said what always comes back around...? 🤔😂

@Zaphrella @BoozeyBeauty This specific hit is on the O'keefe's only. It's their lawsuit against Karen and the bars.

@BoozeyBeauty I suspect that, after all the $ costs of this & the mental/emotional costs of the past many yrs, that the Alberts will start to wish that they made that 911 call & taken the $ hit for the dog assisted manslaughter back when it happened. That payout may now multiply.

@annaforthedrama @Zendaya_Updated @LUXURYLAW He's working with an actress who has made plenty of statements about sustainable fashion. Cate is known for re-wearing dresses. They both look fabulous.

@Zendaya_Updated @LUXURYLAW girl what are we doing

Law Roach shares Zendaya's look for the night on Instagram.

@TheEmilySee @KyleSharkey8 @BostonGlobe Agree. "As well as" means two or more. I read it as his twin brother plus someone else. If his brother had been named but the father has not... How would that be the same person?

@KyleSharkey8 @BostonGlobe I feel like this headline is misunderstanding this sentence, unless they have additional info beyond it

@BoozeyBeauty At least you spelled individual right. His lawyers need to be more careful. How are you going to have a typo correcting your screw up.

And just like that… overnight, we’ve got an amended filing in the Sandra Birchmore case. 🩵😅 Matthew Farwell is now saying his twin brother is NOT the father of Sandra’s baby and instead points to an “unknown individual,” which is exactly what the government has stated all along after it was confirmed Matthew was not the father. Of course, the original claim in his first filing immediately caught attention, sparked headlines, and led to a wave of speculation about his brother being the father. And now, just as quickly as that claim appeared, it’s been walked back and replaced with what the government has maintained from the start. That being said, he is still clearly taking a shot at his brother by emphasizing that while he stayed in Massachusetts, Billy left the state after Sandra’s death despite also having a relationship with her, which keeps that contrast front and center even without the paternity claim. So while we still do not have public confirmation of who the father of Sandra’s baby is, what this amendment does make clear is that the defense is adjusting its position in real time, and whoever that individual is has still not been publicly identified.

@KyleSharkey8 @suspiciousauce @GrantSmithEllis @SandraBirchmore WOW!!! What are they doing??? Even with the update, his defense is still not being careful enough. The bolded word "individual" is misspelled.

United States v. Farwell (1:24-cr-10259) District Court, D. Massachusetts's -OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DETENTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF RELEASE Amended footnote #12 @suspiciousauce @GrantSmithEllis @SandraBirchmore (Farwell brother is NOT the father)

@SandraBirchmore I wonder if it's just not being careful enough with AI. I have had it change the context of a sentence while "proofreading."

The Boston Globe’s story from yesterday was amended because Farwell’s defense amended their filing it now says William is not the father. We’ll refrain from posting about the father is until there is factual information. This isn’t a game we don’t know what his defense is doing!

@NateNewsNow @LexiTheLawNerd Thank you! Your interviews have been excellent! Thanks for letting them just speak their mind. Didn't Kouri's lawyers make accusations against the jury after the verdict? Not going to get far, imo. These jurors have had a great recounting of facts, should have put on a case.

As the verdict in the Kouri Richins trial was being read, I noticed juror #4 was visibly emotional. I thought about how much I'd love to ask him what he was thinking during that moment. Tonight I will. Tony, the juror, will join me on "Courtroom Insider" to discuss the case, his service as a juror, the witnesses, the evidence and more. Don't miss our unedited conversation - 7 p.m. MDT on the @EastIDNews YouTube channel.

@TheDarthXander @NateNewsNow Isn't the emotional in that sentence referring to the juror?

@NateNewsNow Emotional? She’s guilty as sin. Nothing emotional about it.

@KyleSharkey8 @suspiciousauce @TheEmilySee @trialchannel_ She needs to see a highlight reel of how she treated Alessi and take her own advice.

“Just treat people well, you’d be surprised how far that goes”-Auntie Bev. Well let’s just say you did NOT treat Karen Read well! @suspiciousauce @TheEmilySee @trialchannel_

@annieone3 @OliviaLambo_ Yes. He obtained a restraining order from family court.

@OliviaLambo_ Who currently has her son? The father?

Kelsey Fitzsimmons makes first public statements after being acquitted: “I got shot. I went to jail for 103 days. I haven’t seen my son. I had to sell my home that I worked very hard for. So, this is my first breath of fresh air, and I feel like I can breathe again.”

@TrialsByDay @SarahJuror13 Well... The police also didn't care about the video of Justin B&E, so why would they care about a comment?

@SarahJuror13 No. She wasn’t credible. Then, once she said Crawford’s name, it made her even less credible. If she had incriminating information, she should’ve went to police. Not a podcaster.🤦🏼‍♀️

I see why some may question Maureen credibility after prosecutor calls out her social media pst, but to me it actually made her more believable. She comes off nosy..knows her neighbors a cop, so I believe she would 100% try to get any info she can out of him. #KelseyFitzsimmons

@RubyD_JinaG Melanie Little has been covering it on YT since July 2025. I listened to all the pretrial stuff with her. It's been a wild rollercoaster!

Several independent true crime creators and smaller digital outlets began covering the Kelsey Fitzsimmons case well before the trial started in March 2026. While major news outlets like NBC10 Boston and Court TV dominate current trial livestreams, the following independent creators were among the first to provide deep-dives and consistent updates: ClasseBeats: This creator posted a significant update and deep-dive titled "The Strange Story Of Kelsey Fitzsimmons" on December 24, 2025, nearly three months before the trial began. The video explored the "cop-on-cop" shooting allegations and the surrounding legal complexities. Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski (True Crime Today): This channel has been one of the most prolific, posting detailed commentary and "ad-free advance episodes" starting around March 18, 2026, just days before the trial's official start. They have focused on the lack of body camera footage and the conflicting stories between Fitzsimmons and the officer who shot her. The In Between Podcast with Mel Barrett: Mel Barrett has provided extensive coverage, including a Pre-Trial Recap on March 12, 2026. Her coverage is notable for questioning the official narrative and highlighting "legal bombshells" and bail condition changes that occurred before the trial. True Crime Squad: Hosted by Kristi Brower, this channel featured the case in a "Missing Persons Spotlight" and case update episode on March 19, 2026, contributing to the early independent digital footprint of the case. Truth and Transparency (Lana Oriani): While primarily known for other Massachusetts cases like Karen Read, Oriani's platform has been active in monitoring developments related to Massachusetts law enforcement, including the Fitzsimmons case.  No mention of Kearney by Google AI. Just making sure 😉