The Ohio State University Department of Psychology

ONE WEEK AWAY! Join us July 21 for a free public panel on AI and its real-world impacts. The panel is part of the groundbreaking Mind and Machine Alignment Summit. Learn more and RSVP: go.osu.edu/DKPC

Join us July 21 for a free public panel on AI and its real-world impacts! Part of the Mind and Machine Alignment Summit, this event will address pressing questions about AI and human well-being. Learn more and RSVP: go.osu.edu/DKPC

Dr. Richard Petty co-developed the Elaboration Likelihood Model, one of the most widely used theories in social psychology. It’s work that feels particularly relevant at a time of widespread distrust and misinformation. Read more: go.osu.edu/DKHn

Our Spring 2026 In Mind newsletter is here! Here are some of the highlights. Check it out today: go.osu.edu/DJ6g

Did you know our department offers 14+ student scholarships? We recently spoke to recipients of the alumni-funded Guzzo Endowed Scholarship, which specifically supports psychology double majors. Read about how this fund is changing our students’ lives: go.osu.edu/DJwz

We are excited for today's talk on "Motivated learning and memory processes across development," presented by Dr. Ali Cohen (@aliocohen; @EmoryPsychology)! The talk starts soon (10:30 am ET); make sure you have the Zoom link from our talk webpage: innovatorsincogneuro.github.io/speaker-info/a…

Congrats, our awesome first-years, on finishing their First Year Talk 🎉 Living up to their cohort name, PhDivas, they absolutely slayed their talks and showcased really cool projects! Excited to see all the incredible things they’ll accomplish next 🥳

We often think of forgiveness as simply letting go of anger. But research suggests that when forgiveness affects our thoughts, feelings, and actions, it may help ease depression, anxiety, and lingering resentment. psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-fo…

Want to lead a customized deep-dive session at #SPSP2027, focused on your area of research? Apply to host a preconference. Half-day and full-day formats are available! Apply here before June 22: ow.ly/u9yz50ZaCXo

ICYMI: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (IOP) is now accepting commentaries on a new focal article. The deadline for these commentaries is June 19, 2026. Learn more: tinyurl.com/yv9b8xha #IOPsych #SIOPSmarterWorkplace

What is psychology? We recently started producing a video series to answer this question. In this introduction, learn more about what our department researchers study and how psychology is relevant to everyday life. youtu.be/_GRM16Isods?si…

🎓 Dr. Kristen Lindquist The Robert K. and Dale J. Weary Endowed Chair in Social Psychology at Ohio State Univ. Her work has advanced constructionist models of emotion, and shown how affect emerges from distributed brain networks interacting with cultural and social learning

A psychology professor at Ohio State just dismantled everything you thought you knew about willpower. Dr. Kentaro Fujita has spent his career studying self-control. And his research doesn't say what most people want to hear. Here's what actually works — and what doesn't. The marshmallow test was never really about willpower. You know the experiment. Kid sits alone with one marshmallow. If they wait, they get two. Kids who waited longer apparently became more successful adults. But here's what everyone missed: Walter Mischel's real discovery wasn't that self-control predicts success. It was that self-control can be taught. The kids who waited longer weren't the ones who stared hardest at the marshmallow willing themselves not to eat it. They were the ones who learned tricks — covering it up, closing their eyes, imagining it as a puffy white cloud. "Three-year-olds believe staring at the marshmallow will motivate them. Five-year-olds have already learned that's not going to work." The implication: self-control isn't a fixed trait you're born with. It's a skill set you build through trial and error. The children who figured out which tools worked became the ones who succeeded later. Not because they had more willpower — because they had better strategies. Willpower training barely works. Strategy training does. I spent years believing that willpower is like a muscle. Train it, and you get stronger. Do hard things, and doing hard things gets easier. The data doesn't quite support this. Multiple large-scale replication attempts have struggled to find reliable evidence for the so-called "depletion effect." When labs around the world try to reproduce the finding that doing one hard thing exhausts you for the next — the results are messy. Inconsistent. Often null. What does replicate is this: your beliefs about willpower matter more than your willpower itself. Psychologist Veronika Job created a simple questionnaire asking people whether they found hard tasks energizing or exhausting. The people who said energizing acted energized after hard tasks. The people who said exhausting showed depletion effects. Same tasks. Different beliefs. Completely different outcomes. So the first thing I'd tell anyone trying to build discipline: stop treating willpower as a finite resource. That belief might literally be creating the limitation you're trying to overcome. The real problem with self-control: it's distance-dependent. Here's the insight from Fujita's own research that I keep coming back to. When a goal is far away, it's easy to commit to it. You think about why you want it — the meaning, the purpose, the bigger picture. It feels clear. Obvious. Of course you're going to go to the gym. Of course you're going to write that book. When the goal is right now, your brain shifts. Suddenly you're thinking about how — and the how is hard, uncomfortable, and miserable. "The clarity I once had is gone. And later, when it's far away again, I look back completely perplexed as to why I didn't do the thing." This isn't weakness. It's a feature of how the human mind processes time. But it explains almost every self-control failure I've ever had, and probably most of yours too. The fix: when you're in the moment of temptation, force yourself back into the "why." Not "I'm on a diet." But "I want to be alive for my kids' wedding. I want to be the person I told myself I'd become." High-order reasons. Meaning. Not rules. Fujita's lab ran experiments where they got people thinking about their why before presenting a self-control challenge. Better self-control — not because of discipline, but because they were simulating the mindset of someone looking from a distance. The self-control toolkit: there's no single right answer. One of the most honest things Fujita said in this entire conversation is that psychology has been looking for the self-control strategy. There isn't one. What works for one person reliably fails for another. What works for you in the morning might not work at night. What carries you through the beginning of a hard workout might be useless at the end. In Fujita's framework, there are multiple tools that work through completely different mechanisms: Think about the why — zoom out to meaning and purpose (works well for abstract future goals) Think about the immediate downside — the sugar crash, the shame, the feeling after the bad decision (works well in the moment, for short-term temptations) Use third-person self-talk — "What would Ken do?" instead of "What do I want?" Creates psychological distance from impulse Invoke a hero — ask what your most admired person would do; research suggests you literally start thinking like them Strategic environment design — remove the temptation from physical proximity entirely rather than white-knuckling it The key is exploration. You have to find out which tools work for you by actually trying them and failing. Failure isn't proof that you have bad self-control. It's data on which tool doesn't fit your wiring. Abstinence vs. moderation — and why you're probably choosing wrong. This is where Fujita's research surprised me most. Most people default to abstinence when setting a goal. All or nothing. No sugar. No Netflix. No exceptions. But moderation is actually harder than abstinence — it requires more self-control, not less, because you have to constantly evaluate whether this particular instance is the allowed exception or a failure. Abstinence is computationally simple: the decision is already made. You just execute. Moderation requires ongoing judgment, willpower in the moment, and clear rules about what counts as a "planned exception" vs. a "justified lapse." So which one should you use? It depends on the type of goal. If one lapse destroys the entire goal — fidelity, sobriety, a competitive streak — abstinence wins. One exception is game over by definition. If one lapse is just one data point in a long pattern — fitness, writing, studying — moderation might actually serve you better, because rigidity breaks under pressure and when it breaks, there's nothing left. The thing nobody talks about: intrinsic motivation and hard things. Fujita closed with something I think is the most underrated insight of the entire conversation. "The best way to cultivate self-control is to do it in a domain you are intrinsically interested in. Because if you don't love it, all the external rewards become punishments." This reframes the whole question. We spend enormous energy trying to force ourselves toward goals we've decided are good for us. And sometimes that's necessary. But the people who sustain extraordinary effort over years and decades — it's almost never because they had better willpower. It's because they found something they actually loved enough to stay in when everything got hard. The hardest part isn't starting. It isn't even the grind. It's finding the thing where the difficulty itself becomes something you're drawn toward rather than running from. When you find that — the self-control problem mostly solves itself. The self-control toolkit isn't one thing. It's exploration, honest failure, and the slow discovery of what actually works for the specific person you happen to be. That's a harder answer than "just use more willpower." It's also a more useful one. Full episode: Master Self-Control & Overcome Procrastination — Dr. Kentaro Fujita on the Huberman Lab Podcast. buff.ly/muhIwQoƯPlFyFC…

CPR Week starts today ❤️ Buckeye Nation shows up when it counts—and that can make a life-saving difference. @Brutus_Buckeye shows how with @OhioState and @OSUWexMed → spr.ly/6010B8i1PO #CPRWeek #NationOfLifesavers

Our lab had a great time celebrating @kurtjgray 's installation as Weary Foundation Endowed Chair at Ohio State! 🎉

Professor Kentaro Fujita was recently a guest on the @hubermanlab podcast, where he spoke about the science of self-control and overcoming procrastination. Take a listen: go.osu.edu/DJEk

Congratulations Richard E. Petty of @OhioStatePsych, newly inducted #NASmember! #NAS163 #psychology

Congrats to our first C-SPAM Seed Grant recipients! @OSUWexMed's Christi Trask and her team will study older adults' vulnerability to misinformation. @ASCatOSU's Thomas Wood and Katie Gouge will study how people weigh evidence around polarizing issues. go.osu.edu/DHxA

Congratulations to the psychology faculty, staff, and student who received the 2025-2026 College of Arts and Sciences awards! Recipients include Peter Kvam, Jay Myung, Russell Fazio, Trisha Van Zandt, Katy Lenz, Ashley Sweaney and Tinu Oduloye. go.osu.edu/DHhz

Coming up next week in the Department of Psychology: April 30 @ 11:00 a.m. in Psychology Building Rm 35: Wickens Lecture with Dr. Heather Cameron Learn more: go.osu.edu/DHKS