Per Olsson

805 posts

Per Olsson banner
Per Olsson

Per Olsson

@Olssonomics

Swedish defence economist and researcher tweeting about... you guessed it, defence, economics and research!

Stockholm, Sverige Katılım Ocak 2017
117 Takip Edilen506 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
Why does the phrase ”Lions led by donkeys” so frequently haunt me these days..?
English
0
0
1
97
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@stevehou I’m gonna save this and return to it in 6 months!
English
0
0
0
80
Ruffin Perri-Greno
Ruffin Perri-Greno@gyina_yie·
How ruthless is container loading at Chinese port! No wonder foreign workers are completely overwhelmed.
English
321
1.1K
10.6K
5.8M
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@Tracking_Live @BallerDezz Sounds like guesswork to me! I too find it crazy that they would have qualified pilots for all, but the sources I can find state that their pilots have good amount of flight hours so they’re learning.
English
0
0
0
232
INTEL-24
INTEL-24@Tracking_Live·
@BallerDezz Yep, that's actually the problem, they have quantity but no quality. whereas itc counterparts like U.S and India does have pilot proven skills and combat experience.
English
10
1
15
2.3K
INTEL-24
INTEL-24@Tracking_Live·
As per a new report published by a U.S. defense establishment, China is adding ~20-30 new advanced fighter jets per month to its inventory, which is likely ~240-300 annually. This includes the J-20 stealth fighter, with 100 to 120+ units produced annually; some reports suggest one J-20 is built every 8 days (approximately 3-4 per month). The J-16 production is high, with an estimated 80–100+ units delivered annually; also, the J-10C and J-35 are in the list."
INTEL-24 tweet media
English
28
68
629
35.7K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@Tracking_Live How do you get 120 annually with 3-4 per month? The 100-120 claim is from RUSI, IISS and Mitchell Institute. As credible as sources come, though not perfect.
English
0
0
0
344
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
Tidigare citerat IFRs rapport och måste rätta mig efter deras revision! Kina har inte lika hög robotäthet som man tidigare trott! Endast 166 jämfört med USAs 307, däremot är ökningstakten betydande.
Amelia Michael@amelia__michael

Update: looks like the IFR revised down their density numbers for China! They now match my estimate of around 166 robots / 10,000 manufacturing workers, placing China 22nd in global robot density. therobotreport.com/ifr-reports-ro…

Svenska
0
0
0
60
Rasmus Jarlov
Rasmus Jarlov@RasmusJarlov·
In the future, there will be three major powers in the world: China, USA, EU. Neutral countries will move as much as possible towards the EU as their preferred partner because both China and the USA treat other countries disrespectfully and try to extort them. Europe will be the only great power and market to turn to if you want to have an equal and fair relationship. Canada is already moving towards Europe for this exact reason. India and Japan will also form a closer relationship with Europe. This is what soft power means. MAGA replies in the comment section will prove the point.
English
3.6K
631
5.8K
745.9K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@ForeignAffairs You really accept any types of idiots don’t you! No, China can’t project military power like the US, but there are other forms of power!
English
0
0
0
161
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs@ForeignAffairs·
China and Russia are incapable of competing with the projection of American power, argues Michael Beckley. The result is a “one-sphere world” dominated by the United States. foreignaffairs.com/united-states/…
English
61
18
66
25.5K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@klara_sjo @pantry_bandit Interviews with showrunners make me glad they ended when they did. It was going to take a weird turn to Britannia where Caesarion was going to lead a rebellion… not something I wanted to see.
English
0
0
0
10
Klara
Klara@klara_sjo·
@pantry_bandit I gotta do that, quality show that ended far too soon.
English
5
0
97
12K
Klara
Klara@klara_sjo·
Historically accurate Roman marching music.
English
122
925
9.1K
379.4K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@klara_sjo There are no preserved notations from Roman military songs. We have some lyrics, by Caesar’s legions roasting him, but no notes. Rome (2005) is accurate overall, and I love it, but I would call this music authentic (in spirit) rather than accurate.
English
0
0
0
66
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@olawong Blivit mer sofistikerade, även Trump i sweatshop fick bra spridning och var ganska underhållande.
Svenska
0
0
1
44
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@SpencerGuard @ForeignPolicy I don’t think ”don’t get too close to China, we can bomb you” is a long-term or resource efficient strategy. May I suggest diplomacy and mutually beneficial deals, which traditionally has benfitted the US.
English
0
0
0
106
John Spencer
John Spencer@SpencerGuard·
"China Is Learning the Lessons of Hard Power" @ForeignPolicy Great analysis. I agree. foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/09/chi… China Is Learning the Lessons of Hard Power Economic strength alone is insufficient If the United States can dismantle that pillar in a region closely tied to China’s energy supply and diplomatic footprint, and at relatively low cost, the damage will not be limited to China’s immediate interests in the region. More fundamentally, it would prompt countries, especially those in the global south that are dissatisfied with U.S. dominance, to reconsider whether drawing closer to China provides any meaningful security assurance. China’s overseas influence today rests largely on economic presence and political cooperation rather than on military alliances When Washington chooses hard power, China is rarely in a position to offer comparable security backing. The United States can potentially reshape regimes in strategically important regions, which China currently lacks the ability to stop. Beijing’s real red line is not whether the Iranian regime ultimately survives—something China may have little power to prevent—but whether Iran is swiftly and smoothly absorbed into a U.S.-dominated regional order.
English
35
141
503
31.8K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@tshugart3 Agree that the PLAN’s capability to do so is limited. However, the Ford’s design problems are well known and keeping a carrier at sea for 10 months is not ideal even for USN.
English
0
0
0
82
Tom Shugart
Tom Shugart@tshugart3·
Deploy one of your new carriers to the other side of the planet for 10 months and then we can talk. Until then, 🤐.
Global Times@globaltimesnews

#Opinion: The Ford's laundry fire is more than an isolated mishap. Even on history's most costly warship, a laundry-room fire has laid bare a brutal truth – in a war of attrition, victory never hinges on the price tag of the weapons. It hinges on who can endure the longest grind. globaltimes.cn/page/202603/13…

English
46
57
1.2K
52K
Tyler Rogoway
Tyler Rogoway@Aviation_Intel·
The World’s Ugliest Airplane Just Flew For The First Time In a world of increasingly homogeneous- looking military aircraft designs, the platypus-like Kawasaki EC-2 is a radical outlier. twz.com/air/the-worlds…
English
84
108
807
68.5K
Per Olsson retweetledi
Robert Dalsjö
Robert Dalsjö@MansRAD·
Kloke kollegan @anhornedal stod nyss i SvT:s Aktuellt och förklarade lugnt och kunnigt hur Irans Shaheed 136-drönare fungerar och hur Ukraina bekämpar dem - kunskaper som just nu är livligt efterfrågade av Gulfländer med pengar. @FOIresearch
Svenska
1
7
29
2.4K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@klart_skepp Bra reality-check! Saker går sönder i krig, även bra saker. Lika bra att skaffa det mind-setet.
Svenska
0
0
0
20
Lazzyyyyyy
Lazzyyyyyy@em_Lazzy·
First Donald Trump insulted America’s allies. Then he tariffed them. Now he’s asking for their help. If you were them… how would you respond??
English
1K
343
2.7K
72.3K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@GordonGChang Start a war without clear objectives, brag about how great its going, ask your main rival to bail you out. 5D chess right there! Why the flying f*** would China help Trump get out of a war he fumbled his way into?!
English
0
0
0
24
Gordon G. Chang
Gordon G. Chang@GordonGChang·
Trump threatens to delay the summit with Xi Jinping if China continues to reject his request for assistance to open the Strait of Hormuz. So far, Beijing is not budging.
English
115
178
1.1K
69.4K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@kenmoriyasu How does this add up?! This is what I see from pundits on X. ”Iran war is Trump’s masterstroke to contain China.” Same kind of people.” Trump is genious for asking China to use its power to help with Iran war!”
English
0
0
1
87
Ken Moriyasu
Ken Moriyasu@kenmoriyasu·
Trump’s demand that China help out in the Hormuz is a nightmare for Beijing. If it helps the US, Iran won’t sell oil to it anymore and might even attack Chinese ships. Trump is making China choose sides, which it doesn’t want to do. Very Trumpian. giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/ac…
English
200
44
159
129.7K
Per Olsson
Per Olsson@Olssonomics·
@SFRCdems @SenatorShaheen Don’t know how giving them Kirgizistan and Tadzjikistan affects that competitiveness, is the US obsessed with handing them wins?!
English
0
0
0
7