@Mikethewander1 @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 You don’t think it’s rational to want better outcomes?
English
Omnibenevolent
2K posts
Omnibenevolent
@Omnibenevolent
A genuine guy with a twisted sense of humor!
Katılım Temmuz 2011
47 Takip Edilen33 Takipçiler
English
People don’t defend God because the evidence is strong. They defend him because the consequences of being wrong were drilled into them before they could think. Fear got there first, and now reason has to fight through it.
English
@Mikethewander1 @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 I agree- you can’t force a belief on someone.
My only point was to say there might be rational reasons to believe, counter to the OP.
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 P.S. belief or a change of belief can't be mandated. It mostly indoctrination or substitution,
English
@Mikethewander1 @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 Humanity might cease to exist, but you didn’t answer my question: if believing might save humanity, is it more rational to believe?
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 There's no evidence of that. People do cease to exist. To no surprise, god(s) do too.
English
@Mikethewander1 @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 But if believing leads to a better outcome where people don’t cease to exist, is it not more reasonable to believe?
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 The human bodies are not the same but whatever. Birth rates may be down due to costs of children and living!
English
@Mikethewander1 @weimsupremacist @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 I think Women should also get their tubes tied (reversible of course) because it takes 2 to tango, and women are no less innocent.
Also birthrates are currently down, and if this trend doesn’t change, there will be zero mouths to feed anywhere. I think that’s a worse outcome.
English
QME
@Mikethewander1 @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 1) If a person is smart, how is a group of people not smart? You’re .gif makes no sense 🤷🏼♂️
2) If something tends to almost always lead to better outcomes and provides an epistemological foundation, and it can’t be disproven, is it not more rational to believe?
English
@Omnibenevolent @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 "If one fears the consequences, is it not more reasonable to believe?" No! Not when it's an irrational fear. Admittedly most fears are irrational, but fears based on ancient tribalism are a step further, they are stupid.
GIF
English
@Mikethewander1 @BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 A) Never said I believe.
B) I’m not trying to prove His existence, just demonstrating why it’s a reasonable belief counter to the OP.
English
English
@Omnibenevolent @TheeOnlyKi65942 the “consequences” are literally made up so of course not
English
QME
@HEPennypack1 @weimsupremacist @TheMSeries1 I’m just curious how this spiraled so quickly. While I admit he can sometimes be overzealous, I don’t see anything bad faith here.
I’ve barely been on here for the last several weeks, so I’m catching up a little- have you two been in a heated discussion recently?
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @TheMSeries1 You don't need to come to his rescue. He's been a bad faith interlocutor in the past and I was willing to give him a second chance a few months ago. He's only reminded me that he's not worth it. Maybe he could take some lessons from you, but as of now, I'm done with him.
English
No amount of words can convey how far behind this country will be in every avenue for a number of years because of this administration and everyone associated with them with stuff like this happening.
Pubity@pubity
Donald Trump has fired the entire National Science Board, all 24 members, all at once. The board was responsible for deciding which scientific projects America should pursue and helping to direct the nation's technological future.
English
@HEPennypack1 @weimsupremacist @TheMSeries1 To be fair, he was actually behaving here, and you started name calling.
People are allowed to have differing views, right? It’s what makes America great. 😎🇺🇸
English
@weimsupremacist @TheMSeries1 I forgot this side of Weim. Thank you for reminding me that you're a waste time👍
English
@BeAncestral4U @TheeOnlyKi65942 If you can’t prove it’s not true, and it seems more beneficial to believe it is true, is it not more reasonable to believe?
English
@Omnibenevolent @TheeOnlyKi65942 No the most reasonable thing to do is to drill down to if it’s true. The fear fades as the illusion of their god is rightfully relegated to those things that are fake until proven true: Santa, ghosts, Bigfoot, etc.
English
@LucasGageX @weimsupremacist @ByJimbob @ReedHawk2 He probably would refute it in a live space, but you seem to be avoiding it…
My simple take is:
Christian: Grounds everything in a stable, never changing entity.
Atheist: Goes by what you think, but it’s all subject to change, so unstable and not grounded.
English
We are in dire need of a secular right.
I'm not super right-wing, but certainly not a leftie.
English
@weimsupremacist @LucasGageX @ByJimbob @whytedood @ReedHawk2 I remember playing a stimulating game of TAG and then eating a big ol’ slice of homemade PIE afterwards when I was a kid. 🥧 😋
Great memories!
English
Omnibenevolent@Omnibenevolent
@LyingWrongAgain @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical Dude, cope is not cutting your losses and letting it go 😉 -Not an unprovoked sneak attack -Demands were issued -Comparison made to PH communications, not the attack. All demonstrated, and also now available in a substantive review- yours free! Click for more details 😉👇
QME
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical AFAICT you have conceded or failed to prove wrong all but 3 words of the OP (incl the last contention)
those 3 words were clarified in post #2
after clarification, you have also conceded or failed to prove that wrong 🤷♂️
Good game 🫡
English
A few days ago, I compared the attack to Pearl Harbor
Not to equate the US to Iran; only to say it was, factually, an unprovoked sneak attack, no demands issued & no prior declaration of war
A MAGA acquaintance said if you draw that comparison, you aren’t a serious person🧐
Kaitlan Collins@kaitlancollins
Asked why he didn't coordinate with allies before going to war with Iran, Trump says, "We didn't tell anyone about it. Who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor, OK?"
English
@LyingWrongAgain @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical Dude, cope is not cutting your losses and letting it go 😉
-Not an unprovoked sneak attack
-Demands were issued
-Comparison made to PH communications, not the attack.
All demonstrated, and also now available in a substantive review- yours free!
Click for more details 😉👇
Weim@weimsupremacist
@LyingWrongAgain @Omnibenevolent @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical You were unable to demonstrate anything in the OP highlighted was wrong, esp the key contention (that ‘serious’ ppl like POTUS can in fact draw comparison)
Criticism focused on 3 words. Clarification was needed. Clarification was provided in post #2
The rest was just cope 🤷♂️
English
@LyingWrongAgain @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical I appreciate the explanation, but I did that on purpose.
The OP was demonstrated to be wrong, a substantive analysis was done, and the discussion is over.
Again, I was only here for the OP.
Weim@weimsupremacist
@LyingWrongAgain @Omnibenevolent @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt…
English
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical Omni: the post I linked to was in the REPLIES to the post you linked to
In response, here you posted a link that’s not a REPLY to what I posted; but rather, the other way around
Not sure if you realized that or not (threads can be hard to follow)
English
@LyingWrongAgain @weimsupremacist 👇🤷🏼♂️
Weim@weimsupremacist
@LyingWrongAgain @Omnibenevolent @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical grok.com/share/c2hhcmQt… LLM’s will recognize that you correctly applied the criteria that came later to both Iran and PH and chalk that up to W, but that is and always has been beside the point. It was granted. How are you still not getting this dude?
QME
@weimsupremacist @Omnibenevolent “Weim swooped in and threw the final blow with Grok”
Also: “Start with the OP and try again” 🤪👇
Apparently grok is right when it agrees with you but when it agrees with someone else that’s cheating 😂
You guys are too funny x.com/lyingwrongagai…
Make Lying Wrong Again@LyingWrongAgain
@Omnibenevolent @weimsupremacist @thewhitewolf51 @kiwi_skeptical You’re saying, ask grok again but link to the OP instead of the most recent post? Ok, done x.com/i/grok/share/a…
English