Сатаноши 🍌🐵

🤨

Most politicians are just the actors on the stage. You don’t see the scriptwriters, directors and producers who control them.

This dream will soon be a reality. Who's with me?

Wenn die ganze Grönlandaktion für Präsident Trump nur die Abkürzung zum Austritt aus der NATO ist (und das könnte durchaus sein), dann sollten sich die Europäer fragen, warum Trump aus der NATO raus will. Die Antwort: Die Europäer haben mit ihren False Flag Aktionen so oft versucht, den Ukraine-Krieg zu einem Russland-NATO-Krieg zu machen, dass der US-Präsident das Risiko eines Weltkrieges jetzt auf diese Weise beendet: Keine NATO, keine Beistandspflicht, kein Weltkrieg. Dann kann Europa alleine gegen Russland antreten, wenn es unbedingt will. Das wird aber ein kurzer Krieg, denn Europa hat keine Munition mehr, die wurde mehr oder minder komplett an die Ukraine verschenkt. Und im Falle eines Krieges ist auch die Produktion schnell vorbei, denn die Standorte sind ja öffentlich bekannt und die Oreschnik trifft immer. Wenn die Europäer also Grönland behalten wollen, dann sollten sie schleunigst beim Thema Ukraine Vernunft annehmen und einen realistischen Frieden anstreben.

BREAKING: Greenland considers bypassing Denmark, meeting with U.S. about possible acquisition of the country.

🇸🇦Saudi Official: “When our refinery was attacked, we asked the US for help—but they stayed silent. Now, as we try to make peace with Iran and reduce tensions, America is deliberately sabotaging the process. They want war. The US is a war empire; it cannot survive without conflict.”

BREAKING: 🇩🇪 The automotive industry in Germany continues to sink Volkswagen will stop vehicle production at its Dresden plant, marking the first factory closure in Germany in its 88-year history.

You’ve probably heard of Supra Oracles, now let’s actually learn how to use them. Catch the breakdown in DevWire Newsletter #10. hub.supra.com/devwire

Deutschland steht bei Verhaftungen wegen Online-Kommentaren weltweit auf Platz 3. Das ist für einen angeblich demokratischen Staat verheerend und inakzeptabel.

🚨BREAKING: Hungary REVEALS Ursula's plans in the European Union to wage a long war with Russia by 2030. "Touching frozen Russian assets is a Declaration of War, stealing this much money was never been unanswered." -Prime Minister of Hungary, Orbán Viktor 🇭🇺

🇪🇪 Estonian opposition leader Aivo Peterson has been sentenced to 14yrs behind bars for "pro Russian" views and visit to families in Donetsk. Peterson's party pushed for better relations with Russia and denounced NATO & EU policies. EU democracy...

@bitcoin_hotel Bin vor >20 Jahren weg, keine Minute bereut. Brasilien.

Wer will 2026 alles Deutschland verlassen?

Merz didn’t just lose the plot, he turned the Chancellery into a personal Gestapo office, hand-signing nearly 5,000 criminal complaints, without shame, against ordinary citizens who mocked him online. Five thousand. In a "democracy". Over "insults". One welfare recipient had his home raided and his phone confiscated because he called Merz a “little Nazi.” A court later ruled the search illegal, but the message was unmistakable: the German state now treats wounded pride as a police matter. And while Merz postured about donating all compensation to charity, he quietly outsourced this vengeful crusade to a company that pockets 50% of the damages. A pay-to-punish racket dressed up as moral leadership. It doesn’t speak of confidence, it speaks of a political class cracking under the weight of its own irrelevance. The approval numbers say the rest. Merz is languishing below 23 percent. Starmer is at 22. Macron, whose entire presidency is now underpinned by contempt for French citizens —is at 11. These aren’t leaders; they’re custodians of a collapsing order that commands zero respect. Nobody likes warmongers. And Europe’s citizens, finally, are saying it out loud. Merz’s meltdown is not an isolated tantrum, it’s the domestic expression of the broader censorship machine Brussels has constructed through the Digital Services Act. At the top you have EU technocrats threatening platforms like X with financial execution if they don’t enforce Brussels’ Orwellian speech orthodoxy. At the bottom you have the German Chancellor himself filing thousands of criminal complaints and sending police to people’s doors. It’s the same instinct, censorship from above, intimidation from below. Europe claims it is defending democracy from Russia; what it’s actually doing is defending the EU establishment from its own citizens. The war failed, the sanctions backfired, industries controlled demo'd, and the voters rebelled. So the elites reached for the only tool they trust, repression. Germany, once the industrial heart of Europe, is now an economy running on emergency generators, energy insecurity, shuttered factories, and a middle class squeezed to the breaking point. And Merz’s answer, in the middle of this economic wreckage, isn’t strategy or vision or accountability. It’s lawsuits. Raids. Surveillance. Turning well deserved dissent into a criminal matter. It’s the reflex of a ruling class that knows it has broken something fundamental and is terrified of the coming reckoning. Meanwhile, the multipolar world is moving on. Russia spent the past four years rebuilding its industries, redirecting its energy corridors, strengthening its alliances across Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. It treated the conflict as existential and acted like a sovereign Power preparing for the long haul. Europe, under Merz, Macron, Starmer, von der Leyen, and the rest of the war-party clique, treated it as a moral vanity project, now they spend their days policing memes and filing criminal complaints against broke citizens on social welfare. A continent that once built cathedrals now builds blacklists. A union that once promised prosperity now polices sarcasm. A political class that once claimed to represent “European values” now hides behind censorship decrees and police warrants. Merz’s 5,000 complaints aren’t about defending democracy, they’re about insulating a discredited elite from accountability. They know the reckoning is coming. They know they can’t censor their way out of geopolitical ruin, raid their way out of industrial collapse, or sue their way out of a proxy war they already lost. So they panic. They tighten the screws. They lash out at their own people. But once a population sees the mask slip, there is no turning back. Because when Europe finally wakes from this nightmare, the anger will not be directed east. It will be directed upward, toward the warmongers who tried to silence an entire continent to save themselves

The Streisand Effect 😂

🚨 WHAT A LEADING U.S. LAW PROFESSOR JUST REVEALED 🚨 A major warning was issued this week—not by activists, not by commentators, but by one of America’s leading constitutional law professors. He was just in Berlin, and what he described is chilling. He said only TWO people at the World Forum were defending free speech… and the rest of the room was demanding coordinated censorship—not just across Europe, but against Americans. And here is what he testified: European regulators want U.S. speech controlled by EU law Platforms are being threatened with ruinous fines International bodies now expect enforcement against U.S. citizens Silence is being globalised through regulation, not debate He also stated that Hillary Clinton personally intensified this push—calling on the EU to weaponise the Digital Services Act when Elon Musk acquired Twitter. Think about that: A former U.S. presidential candidate urging a FOREIGN authority to pressure an American company into censoring U.S. citizens. According to this professor, what is happening is not organic—it is strategic. He said the Berlin gathering was “the most anti-free-speech event” he had ever attended. He warned that: “This is how censorship becomes internationalised.” Not through law in Washington. Not through court rulings. But through transnational regulatory power overriding domestic rights. As he put it: “Free speech isn’t falling—it’s being dismantled.” This is not speculation. This is testimony—firsthand—from someone who was in the room. Defending free expression is no longer optional—it is urgent. @JonathanTurley

🚨🇪🇺🇺🇸 THE EU JUST FIRED A €120 MILLION WARNING AT X - AND IT BACKFIRED IMMEDIATELY The European Commission has finally done what it has been threatening for nearly 2 years: It slapped Elon’s X with a €120 million fine - the first-ever punishment under the Digital Services Act. Officially, Brussels says this is about “transparency,” “interface design,” and “research access.” Unofficially, everyone knows what this is really about: Europe wants control over online speech, and X refuses to play hall monitor for the EU bureaucracy. And Washington just noticed. @JDVance did what any hero would have done. The man didn’t bother with diplomatic phrasing. He called it exactly what it is: “A fine for not engaging in censorship. The EU should be supporting free speech, not attacking American companies over garbage.” @ElonMusk’s response? 2 words: “Much appreciated.” That exchange matters, because it crystallizes the growing fracture between Washington and Brussels on digital governance. The EU sees the internet as an environment to police. The U.S. - at least the current White House - sees speech as something to protect. This is not a small disagreement. It goes to the core of whose values define the next century of the web. Europe insists this isn’t censorship... but its actions tell a different story. The Commission says X is being punished for deceptive design and insufficient transparency in its ad library. Yet TikTok - whose data practices have triggered national-security alarms in half the Western world - walked away with no fine, simply by promising to tweak its interface. The message is unmistakable: Comply with EU speech rules? No problem. Challenge Brussels’ narrative control? Prepare your checkbook. For a bloc obsessed with “tech sovereignty,” this is an extraordinary way to demonstrate insecurity. U.S. officials have been warning for months that the DSA drifts into censorship. Now Europe has handed them Exhibit A. Expect renewed U.S. pressure in trade talks, increased scrutiny of EU regulatory bias, more aggressive defenses of American platforms, and faster tech decoupling between Washington and Brussels. For Europe, a deeper question looms: Is the DSA protecting citizens - or protecting political power? The ugly truth: Europe risks regulating itself into irrelevance. While Brussels plays digital sheriff, its startups collapse under compliance costs. Its industrial base is shrinking. Its demographic crisis accelerates. Its dependence on U.S. security grows... And its contribution to global innovation keeps sliding. Meanwhile, the platforms it tries to bully - X, Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon - remain overwhelmingly American. Europe is fighting for control over an ecosystem it did not build, does not direct, and increasingly cannot influence without threats and fines. That is not sovereignty. It is dependency dressed up as policy. The bigger fight isn’t about X. It’s about the future of the open internet. What happens next will set the tone for years: If the EU gets away with punishing platforms for “non-compliance,” regulation becomes a weapon. If the U.S. pushes back effectively, free speech stays the default norm for the democratic world. Right now, Brussels is betting that tech giants will bend. But X just became the first major test case that refuses to kneel. Europe wanted to send a message. Instead, it started a transatlantic fight - and exposed its own anxieties in the process.

🇩🇪🇺🇦🇷🇺Germany is losing its mind in public: The Foreign Minister threatens: “Next week Russia either bows… or we enter the war directly. And if it turns into a world war then let it be for Ukraine.” This isn’t political pressure… It’s outright madness from a country once called “Europe’s brain.” When a world war threat becomes a casual sentence… Know that the entire continent is sliding toward disaster.

Bestechungsversuch: Selenskyj dieser völlig korrupte Irre, hat den Slowakischen Regierungschef Fico versucht zu bestechen, indem er ihm 500 Millionen Euro angeboten hat wenn Fico für die Nato Aufnahme der Ukraine stimmt! Solche Arschlöcher will man in der EU haben!

💯

888 Die Bundesregierung hat auf eine parlamentarische Anfrage der AfD bestätigt: Über Geoengineering-Projekte in Europa entscheidet allein die EU-Kommission. Deutschland und die anderen Mitgliedsstaaten stehen außen vor – kein Vetorecht, keine Kontrolle, keine Haftung. Das milliardenschwere EU-Programm „Horizont Europa“ finanziert bereits seit 2021 umstrittene Klima-Experimente: CDR (Carbon Dioxide Removal) – künstliche CO₂-Entnahme durch Aufforstung, Ozeandüngung u.a. SRM (Solar Radiation Management) – Eingriffe in die Sonneneinstrahlung durch Aerosole in der Atmosphäre. Die Bundesregierung räumt ein: „Es gibt keine eigenen Zuständigkeiten, Prüfmechanismen oder Haftung bei EU-geförderten Geoengineering-Projekten.“ Mit anderen Worten: Brüssel experimentiert am Himmel, während Berlin brav bezahlt – ohne Einfluss, ohne Risikoabschätzung, ohne rechtliche Grundlage. Projekte wie GENIE und Co-CREATE laufen längst – sie erforschen, wie sich Wolkenbildung, Ozon und Klima technisch steuern lassen. Und das Budget soll weiter explodieren: Von bisher 95 Milliarden Euro (2021–2027) auf 175 Milliarden Euro für 2028–2034. Offiziell spricht die EU-Kommission von „Moonshot-Projekten“ – visionären Großexperimenten, die Europa in den Bereichen „saubere Luftfahrt, Weltraumwirtschaft und KI“ zur Weltspitze führen sollen. Doch Kritiker warnen: Diese Technologien könnten den Wasserkreislauf verändern, Ozon abbauen, Niederschläge verschieben und ganze Ökosysteme destabilisieren. Ein späterer Stopp wäre kaum mehr möglich – das Risiko wäre unkalkulierbar. AfD-Abgeordnete Nicole Höchst fasst es so zusammen: „Deutschland zahlt mit, prüft aber nichts. Kein Vetorecht, keine Risikoabschätzung, keine Haftung. Wir fordern: nationale Aufsicht, Transparenz und Verantwortung – bevor Experimente am Himmel stattfinden.“ Während also in Brüssel an der Manipulation des Klimas gearbeitet wird, sieht die Bundesregierung „keine besondere Gefährdungslage“ für Deutschland. Fazit: Die EU testet Technologien, die tief in Wetter und Atmosphäre eingreifen – und niemand in Deutschland hat das Recht, „Nein“ zu sagen. Die Frage bleibt: Wer spielt hier eigentlich Gott – und wer trägt die Folgen ?