OptiRefine

Tired of AI-generated code shipping with hidden vulnerabilities? Meet AuraWatch — the first enterprise-grade security scanner for VS Code that actually proves your code is safe. Deterministic analysis + Z3 symbolic execution. Real fixes. marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName…

If you ship code (especially AI-assisted), you need this. Try it free. Let me know what you think. #AuraWatch #VSCode #DevSecOps #AI coding #TypeScript #Python

Tired of AI-generated code shipping with hidden vulnerabilities? Meet AuraWatch — the first enterprise-grade security scanner for VS Code that actually proves your code is safe. Deterministic analysis + Z3 symbolic execution. Real fixes. marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName…

@alexabelonix Thank you!!!!

@OptiRefine super solid work.

your LLM security tool said your code was safe. your LLM security tool hallucinated. your users' data is gone. AuraWatch would have used math. math doesn't hallucinate. #AppSec #DevSecOps #CyberSecurity #VibeCoding #AICode #DevTools #Python #JavaScript #SecurityEngineering

AI security tools hallucinate fixes and break your code. AuraWatch uses Z3 symbolic math to prove vulnerabilities then rewrites your AST with zero syntax errors. Deterministic. Auditable. Ships May 15. #DevTools #AppSec

AuraWatch is a security + auto-fix tool for code written with generative AI. We mathematically prove and fix vulnerabilities (using Z3 + Lossless Semantic Trees) so you can vibe code at full speed without shipping bugs to production. #python #vibecoding #javascript #typescript

@pavelhegler Exactly, AuraWatch isn’t generative it’s for deterministic security. This isn’t to replace generative AI. It’s for protection, a tool to use with AI especially when vibe coding.

@OptiRefine math wont send invoices

Vibe coding is fun until you push a provable vulnerability to production. Traditional engineering is secure until you drown in false positive SAST alerts. We built AuraWatch to sit exactly in the middle. Replacing probabilistic AI guesses with deterministic mathematical proofs.

Stop hoping your AI wrote safe code. Start mathematically proving it. AuraWatch Enterprise Security launches for VS Code, Cursor, and Windsurf Friday, May 15th. #python #javascript #typescript #VibeCode #Security #Vulnerability #Cursor #VSCode #WindSurf

AuraWatch changes that: • Z3 Symbolic Execution → mathematically proves crashes (Div by Zero, etc.) • Lossless Semantic Trees → surgical, syntax-perfect fixes • /VibeCheckThis [CWE-ID] → plain English + hacker exploit path

Developers are shipping at lightspeed with Cursor & Windsurf. But asking those same LLMs to fix complex security issues? Nightmares. Hallucinations. Broken syntax.

Paste your Python function. Get back optimized code, a security audit, and benchmark results. Takes 10 seconds. Completely free to start. OptiScan by OptiRefine 👇 optirefine.qzz.io

OptiRefine’s main focus is improving AI by going deep on pure Python. We’re not chasing new frameworks or fancy abstractions — we work on making AI agents actually write clean, fast, production-grade Python that doesn’t collapse at scale.

I just published I Got Tired of Reviewing the Same Bad Code. So I Built a Tool That Does It For Me. medium.com/p/i-got-tired-…

Your Python code is slow. You just don't know why yet. OptiScan by OptiRefine detects O(n²) bottlenecks, nested loops, and memory leaks in seconds — then rewrites the fix for you. Free to try 👇 optirefine.qzz.io

Try OptiScan: optirefine.qzz.io

@ItsAlexhere0 AST + CST parsing for LLM-generated Python code. Everyone obsesses over the model, but nobody talks about the static analysis layer that actually catches dead code, memory leaks, security vulns, and perf bottlenecks before they hit prod. This is why we built OptiScan.

What’s one technology you think is massively underhyped right now?

🔐 DevSecOps vulnerability scanning 🧠 Cyclomatic complexity scoring 🪦 Dead code detection 🧯 Memory & resource audit 🧪 In-browser PyTest execution via WebAssembly Free tier is genuinely useful. Pro goes deep.

It rewrites your code. You get the optimized version back. You review it. You decide. That's the workflow. Engineer stays in control.

What it catches: ✅ O(n²) complexity → rewrites to O(n) ✅ N+1 ORM queries → injects .select_related() ✅ requests.get() in async → rewrites to await httpx ✅ Hardcoded secrets & eval() RCE risks ✅ Unclosed file handles & memory leaks ✅ Dead code ✅ Cyclomatic complexity