Kelly

62 posts

Kelly

Kelly

@Outdoorchic33

Katılım Temmuz 2024
75 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
AutisticWavelength
AutisticWavelength@LogicalAlgo·
That FOIA response only says ‘no records found’ for the specific request (probably the mugshot Loomer posted). It doesn’t say no DUI or arrest ever happened. Boreing confirmed the details on record, and Candace responded with ‘he wasn’t convicted of anything.’ That’s still the strongest evidence.
English
2
0
0
19
Alp Pouch
Alp Pouch@alppouch·
Imagine doing your own makeup and hair, then posing for this selfie in your own house
KC@KCKDesign

@JeremyDBoreing Couldn’t have picked a gayer pose for yourself. 😂

English
202
343
5.4K
406.8K
Blake Neff
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff·
During the ASU event we got a question about @MrsErikaKirk becoming the new leader of Turning Point. My answer: There was absolutely no doubt who Charlie's successor was. Charlie knew it and we knew it.
English
1.5K
438
3.9K
489K
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸
Sarcastic Liberty 🇺🇸@SarcasticLiberT·
I have watched them. I was watching consistently up until the last couple weeks. I disagree with you. She was planting seeds about all of them early on. I received so much backlash for saying it but I could see what she was doing 6 months ago and here we are. No one cares about her ratings. People watched Jerry Springer for years. The US is the highest consumer of CSAM. High viewership doesn’t equate to truth or morality.
English
3
0
0
23
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇸
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇸@0IvankaTrumpRV2·
Simple poll. Please be honest! As of today, how much do you still trust this team? A. 100% B. 75% C. 50% D. 25% E. 0%
Ivanka Trump RV Q🇺🇸 tweet media
English
17.6K
736
5.2K
864.9K
Kelly retweetledi
Shadow of Ezra
Shadow of Ezra@ShadowofEzra·
Psyop expert Chase Hughes explains how the CIA recruits influencers, describing a step by step process. He says it begins with overwhelming leverage, where someone is confronted with their browsing history and even private, compromising footage. Then comes the pivot. Praise, protection, and a lucrative offer, sometimes as much as $20,000 a month. Hughes argues the key is making the target feel like it was their choice all along. Even as they are quietly pressured to censor guests, avoid certain topics, or shape their content, they convince themselves it is justified and for the greater good.
English
231
1.9K
5.7K
277K
Kelly retweetledi
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.
ELIZABETH LANE tweet media
English
7.6K
9.8K
58.8K
10.1M
Kelly
Kelly@Outdoorchic33·
@jurisword @benshapiro I think you must have watched a different interview than I did…
English
1
0
0
10
EP
EP@jurisword·
Haha Tucker got absolutely destroyed. His juscapo narratives are getting so old now. He lives in some deranged no violence world where everyone should just get along. Ignorant fool along with his mindless low iq cult followers. Keep crying sooks and Israel keep bombing the shit our other these guys 😂
English
3
0
0
216
Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro@benshapiro·
On the show today: The US hockey team emerges triumphant at the Olympics, and we discuss why it was so awesome; another apparent assassination attempt against President Trump is thwarted; and Tucker Carlson makes a fool of himself with Ambassador Mike Huckabee. Watch here: youtube.com/watch?v=FXHQ9f…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
320
121
1.5K
315.3K
Matt Wallace
Matt Wallace@MattWallace888·
People are noticing the rings on Erika Kirk’s fingers! What does “MG” stand for?
English
2K
237
3.8K
5.1M
Kelly
Kelly@Outdoorchic33·
@RealCandaceO I am so confused right now. There were so many mentions of Trump in those files, disgusting stuff! But, now, those files have been removed from the DOJ website. And, absolutely nobody is talking about it. Including Candace! I am completely shocked and disappointed.  Wth?
English
0
0
0
4
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Today on the show: BAAL so hard: the elites caught up in the Epstein files and the obvious names that are STILL being protected. Also, did anybody catch that Josh Hammer claims that the now-infamous message Charlie wrote about abandoning the Israel cause was actually sent the night before he was murdered? The very same night he messaged security and said “they are going to kill me?” I think we know who “they” might be… youtube.com/live/CEF7gQRWY…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
943
2K
11K
628K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Back online after internet blackout. I grew up in Connecticut and have truly never seen an ice like this ever. The temperature is 30 degrees but the ice on our trees tops is not melting at all. Never seen anything like this. Anybody else?
English
3.6K
680
11.7K
4.6M
Jordan S90
Jordan S90@Jordan_S90·
@RealCandaceO Christian values? Candace Owens. Your values are antithetical to Christian values. Your entire show is gossip, slander, and personal attacks. Who are you trying to fool? You're a child of the Devil.
English
26
4
123
5.1K
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Wow! If the below tweet gets 10k likes, Tucker Carlson’s Alp Pouch will sponsor Maggie Wegner for the bravery it took to turn down the Daily Wire’s money when what they asked her to do conflicted with her Christian values. Let’s go!! 🔥🔥
Alp Pouch@alppouch

10k likes on this tweet and we will sponsor Maggie Wegner for her bravery. We need to make sure her life/livelihood isn’t threatened for this. ALP community, like below if you want us to do it.

English
561
2.2K
27.5K
1.3M
Crystal Beyond Labels
Crystal Beyond Labels@CrystalByndLbls·
@NatlyDenise_ It’s so sad that they even have address this especially from a woman that claimed to be Charlie Kirk’s “best friend”. She’s deplorable.
English
5
1
14
125
NΛTLY DΞNISΞ
NΛTLY DΞNISΞ@NatlyDenise_·
Blake Neff (close to CK) put words to what so many of us have been observing: The behavior coming from the most zealous Candace followers has been something beyond the usual internet chaos. "𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗬 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗦𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗔"
English
78
63
546
15.1K
Kelly retweetledi
𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽
𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽@idropFbombs·
I like his message!! It all starts with what we put in our bodies. 💯💪
English
312
9.6K
38.8K
750K