Red Ted 🌏 🌍 🌎 Anti-fascist #LabourFiles

Please spread the word jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/jews-d…

Best video I've seen in a long while. 🥺❤️

@falbo1 @mjfree @grok GPT's just as bad.

@mjfree @grok Grok doesn't always get it right. This morning when i asked about trump's post it claimed it was false 🤷

Hey @grok - where are accurate reports that prove Trump had "very good talks" with Iran? Smells like bullshit to me. You? Pls give sources. Thanks!

Operation Rolling Thunder. From 1965 to 1968, the United States conducted a sustained bombing campaign against North Vietnam. The goal was to break the will of the North Vietnamese government and people. To make the cost of continuing the war too high to bear. They dropped 864,000 tons of bombs. The will was not broken. So they escalated. Operation Linebacker. Operation Linebacker II, the Christmas Bombings of 1972: twelve days of around-the-clock bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong, described by some U.S. generals as trying to "bomb them back to the Stone Age." Hospitals were hit. Residential areas were hit. Bạch Mai Hospital, the largest hospital in North Vietnam, was hit repeatedly. After the Christmas Bombings, the North Vietnamese negotiating position at the Paris Peace talks did not weaken. It strengthened. They bombed us into refusing to surrender. Every bomb that fell on a hospital, every family killed in their home, every village erased from the map created ten more people who would die before they accepted foreign domination. This is what American strategists, with all their degrees and all their think tanks and all their war games, failed to understand about the people they were trying to break. You cannot bomb dignity out of people who have decided they would rather die than give it up.

@CallMeKulubya America produces a lot of oil but probably uses most of it. Russia produces a lot, but is under sanctions. Europe and Asia probably get a lot from the Middle East, and much of that is now blocked. Houthis could also block Red Sea, which leads to Suez Canal. Houthis support Iran.

If Iran has the strait of Hormuz claimed to control about 20% of the World’s Oil and Gas , why don’t the world concentrate on the 80% they have no control about. I really don’t understand why the focus is on the 20% . WHO controls the 80%?

@ScottishSuffra1 @canthelpmenow7 Pretty sure that's not what the Quran actually says, it's what racists say it says.

@canthelpmenow7 A religion whose treatment of women is inhumane? Whose prophet married a 6-year-old and raped her at 9? No, thank you. He will grow up to respect women and girls.

My grandson came home yesterday and told his mum that they had a lesson on muslims, and their religion in school that day. Today, my family decided that as Christians, catholics, and with Jewish relatives as well as women's rights activists aplenty within our family, this was not appropriate, needed, or wanted. Monday, the head teacher will have a complaint she never imagined, she will never forget and will never wish repeated.

@ScottishSuffra1 @AcademicMrT Suffragettes were recent, my gran knew one Pankhurst sister. Britain was a Christian country. 400 years of parliament - no vote for women. You are simply a racist.

@AcademicMrT No, thank you. A religion where they have child marriage, and an appaling record on abuse towards women is not something I want taught to my grandson.

@pix3lpro @BBCBreaking Since when did the int community ever listen to the UN? UN said Israel's occupation of Palestine is illegal for decades. Doesn't stop Starmer and others declaring unconditional loyalty to the genocidal state.

@OutriderTed @BBCBreaking Yes, they are, but so is Iran now that a binding UN resolution has been issued by the international community.

UK agrees to let US use British bases to strike Iranian sites targeting Strait of Hormuz Follow live: bbc.in/3PB0sHr

@pix3lpro @BBCBreaking This war was started when America and Israel attacked Iran. They are the aggressors.

@BBCBreaking Article 51 (Self-defence): If the strikes are legally classified as "collective self-defence" (to stop ongoing attacks on shipping), then the UK isn't "allowing aggression." It is "facilitating a lawful action" under international law.

@bountifulpanda @KerryBurgess Named after the Lincoln Lawyer series on Netflix.

@KerryBurgess Why do they name their aircraft carriers after cars? 🤔

So the USS Abraham Lincoln is bowing out and heading home after being struck by a Fattah-2 hypersonic ballistic missile...

@Mezzie13603591 @Jihooncrypto Ageist. I was warning about America 40 years ago.

@Jihooncrypto Trump is destroying the world because of his ego. And boomers of course are still supporting him because they're retarded beyond all belief

@MissLauraMarcus What nonsense. #neveragain for ALL humans not just the Jewish ones. Sincerely - a British Jew. #zionismisnotjudaism #zionismisfascism #israelterroriststate

A quick historical note about the word “Amalek.” The political use of Amalek to describe one’s enemies did not originate in Jewish sources. It appears prominently in Puritan Protestant rhetoric centuries before modern Israel. Example 1 — English Civil War (1644) Puritan preacher Thomas Case preached before Parliament: “The Lord hath sworn that He will have war with Amalek from generation to generation; and so it is with those enemies that oppose the kingdom of Christ.” Context: Puritan clergy were calling Royalists the “Amalekites.” Example 2 — Puritan colonial America (1676) Increase Mather, leading New England minister, wrote during King Philip’s War: “The present war with the Indians is not unlike that which Israel had with Amalek.” Context: Puritan settlers described Native Americans as Amalek. Example 3 — American Revolution (1775) Harvard president Samuel Langdon preached to the Massachusetts Congress: “When a people rise up to oppose the liberties which God hath given, they act the part of Amalek.” Context: British rule was described as Amalek attacking Israel. So historically the pattern is clear: Puritan theology → Biblical typology (“we are Israel”) → Political enemies labeled “Amalek.” Meanwhile, classical Jewish law actually says the identity of Amalek cannot be known today because ancient nations were mixed (Maimonides, Hilchos Melachim 5:4). In other words: The political use of “Amalek” for contemporary enemies is rooted in Protestant political theology, not in classical Judaism. This should not surprise anyone. When Zionists ike Netanyahu quote theology or the Bible in support of Zionism, the odds are they are using Puritan / Evangelical interpretations, not Jewish ones. Protestant Reformation (1500s) ↓ Puritanism (1600s) ↓ Evangelical revivals (1700s–present) ↓ Jewish Zionism (1800s-present)

This is not Judaism; it is Retzicha (murder). Our sacred Torah strictly prohibits such barbaric cruelty. These settlers represent Zionism, a secular nationalist ideology that has hijacked the Jewish name, they do not represent the Jewish faith. A Torah-observant Jew would never, ever commit such a heinous act. This is a Chillul Hashem (desecration of G-d's name) of the highest order. Source @TorahJudaism @authenttorahjew

@MarkHeath45 Fucking hell, are you really this thick?

Whatever happened to the ozone layer hole?? When i was a kid, i used to shit myself worrying that the hole will end the earth! Obviously now, i am awake to the fact of the globalist agenda, that was the thing in the late 80s early 90s, now its evolved to global warming 😂😂😂

@MichaelRosenYes @gritsfortea @panonse @CrashTestDhimmi I don't think it's really a question of conversion. Judaism evolved from Canaanite religion. Jews were exiled to Babylon. Only then did Judaism become monotheistic, probably to keep Jews together. They returned to Judea/Judah after 50 years.

@gritsfortea @panonse @OutriderTed @CrashTestDhimmi Presumably then, you believe that the Israelites didn't migrate to the Promised Land and defeat the Canaanites? The Israelites sprung up from where they were in Canaan? Where were the Canaanites then?Or did all the Canaanites convert? What's your scenario?

At what point do mass media call Israeli settlers doing this, 'terrorists'?

@MichaelRosenYes @gritsfortea @panonse @CrashTestDhimmi Israelites/Judeans were a branch of Canaanites. They originated in the Southern Levant. Judaism evolved from earlier Canaanite religion. It became monotheistic during 50 year exile of Judeans, after Babylonian conquest. Israel was conquered earlier.

@gritsfortea @panonse @OutriderTed @CrashTestDhimmi I know exactly that. The question is where (according to those stories/sacred texts/myths adhered to by some Zionists) did the Israelites come from before they arrived in the Promised Land? And who was there before (according to the texts)?

@MichaelRosenYes @CrashTestDhimmi Pretty sure the Isrealites branched out from Canaanites.

@CrashTestDhimmi Fun fact: Abraham came from Ur (now in Iraq) and the Israelites came into a Canaan that was occupied by the Canaanites, whose genetics survive in both Palestinians and long-standing pre-1930s Jewish communities in Israel.

@andremoreau1921 @MsPurpleX @WorldByWolf @Eric95060298342 I said I know is, you imbecile.

@OutriderTed @MsPurpleX @WorldByWolf @Eric95060298342 Anti semitism is racism you weapons grade retard.

This is Gaza. The Tories and Reform supported this. Restore must call out what the Israeli state has done to Gaza. Not only is it morally right to do so but when the full extent of the genocide is revealed the British public will never vote for another pro-Israeli politician.

@andremoreau1921 @MsPurpleX @WorldByWolf @Eric95060298342 I know. But I'm not antisemitic, nor racist, you utter turd.

@OutriderTed @MsPurpleX @WorldByWolf @Eric95060298342 Anti semitism is racism you pond life clown.

The Green Party have proposed a policy where the highest paid person in a company could only earn 10x as much as the lowest, currently the ratio is over 1000x in some companies. Do you agree?