ZERO Leverage (HODL Capital)
33.2K posts

ZERO Leverage (HODL Capital)
@PAEOAM
#BTFD #Investing #IPAs #Lawyerist #USAF GDP growth matters. Retweet ≠ Endorsement

Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.

I can make two scrumptious sandwiches, peel a tangerine, and pour a glass of milk in less time than it takes to order Door Dash. They’re poor because public schools teach them to be gay instead of how to manage their money.


On Berlin: "Yet if I lived there, I felt I might turn anti-Semite." -John M. Keynes, "My Visit to Berlin" (1926)

🛑Con esta orden ejecutiva, será casi imposible enviar remesas a Mexico o recibir pagos, salarios, o prestamos si eres indocumentado en Estados Unidos: "Los bancos y otras instituciones financieras también deben estar atentos a los riesgos crediticios derivados de otorgar hipotecas, préstamos para automóviles, tarjetas de crédito y otros tipos de financiamiento al segmento de extranjeros inadmisibles o sujetos a remoción. Muchos de esos prestatarios enfrentan la posibilidad de perder sus ingresos debido a procesos de deportación o a decisiones de sus empleadores de cumplir con la ley migratoria. Conceder crédito a personas sin autorización legal para trabajar, o que enfrentan un riesgo significativo de pérdida de ingresos, genera una deficiencia estructural en la “capacidad de pago”, lo que puede afectar la seguridad y solidez del sistema bancario nacional. Además, los empleadores que violan la ley migratoria pueden subreportar salarios, utilizar números de Seguro Social o identificaciones fiscales inválidos o no coincidentes, o no retener ni remitir correctamente los impuestos sobre la nómina. Estos esquemas pueden crear vulnerabilidades dentro de nuestro sistema financiero al ocultar fuentes de ingresos, distorsionar los procesos de evaluación crediticia y facilitar actividades económicas subterráneas" whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…

I... don't know what to make of this. Survey of teens shows they are arguing less with their parents. 2010: 85% of boys argued -> 67% in 2024 🤷♂️

The rise of the “Stay at home Boyfriend” In 1948, 87% of men worked. Today there are fewer men with payroll jobs than women. Mass migration, anti-male “diversity,” and feminized education crushed young men.


THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE!🤯 The FBI launched its own crypto token last year just to trap the scammers. They were sick of pump and dumps. So they built a real token with a real site and real branding, called it NexFundAI, and waited to see who would show up. Within weeks, scammers were lining up to fake the volume for undercover agents. Then one of them got on a recorded call and said it out loud. Their entire business model was making regular people lose money so they could profit. The FBI had all of it on tape. 18 charged. $25M seized. Arrests across 3 countries. The wildest part? The FBI ran a cleaner crypto project than half the founders out there. And the whole thing was a trap from day one.

We caught him in January and he was charged with a felony and he was and is in the country illegally, but the Judge and Travis County DA released him into the custody of his parents which are also in the country illegally. The things the mainstream media won't tell you.

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

Joel Jamieson did everything right and was still walking around with a 50% blockage in his widowmaker artery. He’s a world-renowned cardiovascular expert who doesn't smoke, doesn't drink, sleeps well, manages stress, trains consistently, and has a VO2 max probably north of 55. He got screened at 40 and found it. He had zero symptoms the entire time. This is the core problem with cardiovascular disease in well-trained individuals — it doesn't announce itself the way we expect it to. The markers we typically use to flag risk don't apply. No excess body weight, no poor lifestyle habits, no reason to think anything is wrong. What actually predicted Joel's risk was his family history. His mom had a stroke at 60. His dad and uncle died early. His brother had a triple bypass before 50. Every signal was there, just not one he could feel. If that kind of history exists in your family, get screened. The CT angiogram runs around $1,200 out of pocket — not cheap, and hopefully that comes down over time. But if you can justify it, it's worth it.



Jeff Bezos said the bottom half of Americans should pay zero federal income tax. He cited a nurse in Queens making ~$75K and paying ~$12K in taxes saying “we shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington.”



This is cope. There has been significant opportunity for millennials if you knew where to find it. If you followed the same playbook as your parents, you were fucked. If you found your own way, learnt from folks like @BowTiedBull life has been on easy mode.




@jeanpaulblartre Mcdonalds was cheap af in the 90s but it was NOT a daily or weekly occurrence. More like, special thing for your birthday get a happy meal. Zoomers dont get that because habits greatly changed by the mid 2000s

I don’t think people realize what an existential threat to civilization this is.

If Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme, then the SSI tax could be suspended today for young people under 30, to help give them a boost on wages, and the program would continue to remain solvent.

America’s Bicentennial was a huge deal in spite of a horrible economy, high crime, an unpopular president, and the country reeling from Vietnam and Watergate. The economy, Iran, and other current events don’t explain the lack of interest in America250. It would still be ignored, possibly even more so, under President Kamala


