Jetti70

OpenAI is nothing but a billionaire factory for people who put in ZERO effort. Greg Brockman just testified that his stake is worth nearly 30 billion dollars and he contributed not one penny himself. Sam Altman and his inner circle have turned the company into their personal cash cow. They preach about saving humanity with AI but deliver massive payoffs to founders who risked nothing financially. Brockman and Altman are greedy frauds who hijacked a once noble project for their own enrichment. The public and investors take all the downside while these parasites collect the billions. It is time to call out this blatant scam for what it is.

BREAKING: OpenAI President Greg Brockman takes the stand, and his opening testimony reveals his stake in the company that started as a nonprofit may now be worth $20 to $30 billion. Under questioning by Elon Musk's lawyer Steven Molo, Brockman confirmed he co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit and served as its chief technology officer. In 2019, OpenAI launched a capped-profit arm, with Brockman receiving an ownership stake. The key exchange came when Robert K. Kry pressed him on the value of that stake. "Your ownership interest in this for-profit is valued today at more than $20,000,000,000. Correct?" Brockman: "Yes." "In fact, it may be closer to $30,000,000,000. Correct?" Brockman: "I think that may be true. Yes." He also confirmed he invested $0 to acquire that stake. The testimony cuts to the heart of Elon Musk's lawsuit, which argues OpenAI walked away from its nonprofit roots so insiders could cash in.

NEWS: Trial testimony today shows both Sam Altman and Greg Brockman owned personal stakes in Cerebras while quietly steering OpenAI toward billions of dollars in deals with the same chip company. Here is how it played out. Back in 2017, Greg Brockman picked up a private stake in Cerebras. Around the same time, Sam Altman put his own money into the company too. That same month, Brockman started pushing OpenAI to merge with Cerebras. Elon Musk, who was funding OpenAI, was never told about Brockman's ownership. Years later, the deals exploded in size. In December 2025, OpenAI signed a $10 billion agreement with Cerebras and loaned the chipmaker another $1 billion. Once those commitments became public, Cerebras's valuation jumped from $8 billion to $23 billion in just two months. By April 2026, OpenAI had stretched the deal to over $20 billion through 2029. Days later, Cerebras filed paperwork to go public at a possible $26.6 billion valuation. On the stand today, Brockman admitted he was on both sides of the table. He acknowledged he was a Cerebras shareholder while OpenAI was negotiating with the company. When pressed, he could not point to a single email, chat or text where he told Elon Musk about his ownership. He also agreed he stood to make personal money if the deal went through, though he claimed it "wasn't something on my mind." The bigger picture is hard to ignore. Two cofounders running a charity directed that charity to spend over $20 billion on a private company they both secretly owned. The valuation tripled. The IPO is now lined up to turn those private stakes into massive payouts. In California, this kind of arrangement has a legal name. It is called self-dealing.

🚨 GREG BROCKMAN JUST CONFESSED UNDER OATH Q: You have an ownership interest in this cap profit company. Brockman: That is accurate. Q: And you invested $0 in order to acquire that interest. Correct? Brockman: That is also accurate. Q: Your ownership interest in this for-profit is valued today at more than $20 BILLION Correct? Brockman: Yes. Q: In fact, it may be closer to $30 BILLION. Correct? Brockman: I think that may be true. Yes. Brockman invested $0. Walked away with $20–30 billion. Musk donated $38 million plus the office rent. Got $0 personally. This is unjust enrichment, captured in his own testimony.

🚨 BOTH ALTMAN AND BROCKMAN SELF-DEALING ON CEREBRAS >Greg Brockman acquires personal Cerebras ownership in 2017 >Altman, separately, invests in Cerebras >Brockman pushes OpenAI to merge with Cerebras that same month >Brockman never discloses his Cerebras ownership to Musk >December 2025: OpenAI signs $10 billion Cerebras deal + loans Cerebras $1 billion >February 2026: Cerebras valuation triples from $8B to $23B on OpenAI commitments >April 2026: OpenAI commitment expanded to $20+ billion through 2029 >April 2026: Cerebras files IPO at potential $26.6 billion valuation Brockman, under oath today: Q: When you were having discussions about a financial transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras, you were actually an owner of Cerebras, weren't you? Brockman: "There was some overlap between discussions and being an investor in Cerebras. Yes." Q: Can you point to an email in which you told Elon you were an owner of Cerebras at the same time you were advocating that OpenAI do this transaction with Cerebras? Brockman: "I do not believe an email that says that exists." Q: How about a chat? Brockman: "I did not." Q: A text? Brockman: "No." Q: And yet you stood to gain personally if there was a transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras. Brockman: "I suppose so, but it wasn’t something on my mind " Both co-founders. Both fiduciaries of a 501(c)(3) charity. They directed OpenAI to commit $20+ billion to a company in which they both hold personal undisclosed equity. Cerebras valuation tripled. The IPO is the cash-out. California charitable-trust law calls this self-dealing.

Sam Altman says GPT-5.5 prompted its creators on how to throw a party for itself. It suggested the flow, the date, the toast, who should give it, and a central suggestion box for GPT-5.6. The model plans to make its own celebration part of the next version.

NEWS: OpenAI lawyers file motion to let Greg Brockman testify about a private settlement message between him and Elon Musk on day 1 of week 2 of the trial. According to the filing, Elon Musk reached out to gauge interest in a settlement. Brockman proposed both sides drop their claims, but Elon Musk refused, reportedly saying: "By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be." Notably, OpenAI is not asking to introduce the actual screenshot, only Brockman's verbal recollection. Critics argue this is a tactical move to plant a private message in the jury's mind without giving Elon Musk a chance to address it directly.

🚨 OpenAI's lawyers filed a motion asking the judge to allow Brockman to testify in front of the jury with a verbal recollection of a settlement message between him and Musk >Musk reached out to gauge interest in settlement >Brockman proposed both sides drop their claims >Musk refused surrender: "By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be." The mainstream news is leaving out what the filing actually says: OpenAI is NOT asking to introduce the screenshot. They want only Brockman's verbal recollection, not the actual exchange. Why verbal, not screenshot? OpenAI's lawyers are trying to play the victim card by putting Brockman on the stand today with a sympathetic story. Brockman is the same defendant whose November 2017 private diary read: "I cannot believe that we committed to non-profit if three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie." Brockman is the person who emailed Musk "honor to work alongside you" six weeks after writing in private that they were planning to oust him. The defense is trying to substitute emotion for evidence because they have no direct evidence Musk's lawsuit is competitive warfare. The anti-competitive frame is the ONLY frame OpenAI has left, because the structural-equity case is what they cannot answer, so they are reaching for tactics.