Tee Jay

5K posts

Tee Jay

Tee Jay

@PJayDet

United Kingdom Katılım Mayıs 2016
190 Takip Edilen97 Takipçiler
Grizz Khan
Grizz Khan@GrizzKhan·
I’m ready to have discussions/debate on what the club need to do now the season has ended and a couple of legends have gone. How many players do we need to sign this summer assuming Ali , Konate and jones stay #LFC
English
78
1
25
15K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@MoSalah No, thank you for the memories you gave us ❤️
English
0
0
0
4
Mohamed Salah
Mohamed Salah@MoSalah·
Longest night of my life. Thank you for everything once again!
Mohamed Salah tweet media
English
3.6K
20.3K
181.5K
1.8M
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@BWMUFC92 If you’re gnna post rules know how to use them first before making yourself look like an idiot. That rules is for shots on target not for shots off target and you’re just proving it’s an OG by using these rules lol
English
0
0
1
239
danny Johnson
danny Johnson@BWMUFC92·
For the nerds sweating, claiming Bruno Fernandes shouldn't keep his assist today nor Patrick Dorgu his goal, here is why you are wrong. Now seethe
danny Johnson tweet media
English
49
78
392
55.8K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@RafaelH117 Yup. Will it be the corrupt pl that we already know with some of the decisions we’ve seen. In this case it’s actually black and white so it’s factual
English
1
0
0
1.9K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@magooglepop That rules for shots on target… Not for shot off target which would make it an OG… People acting smart and using laws when they don’t use them in the right context if anything it’s proving it’s an own goal for those who refute it lol
English
7
1
21
2.3K
Bertrude Magooglepop
Bertrude Magooglepop@magooglepop·
“But Bruno shouldn’t get the assist because it was an own goal though!!” Shut the fuck up! No it wasn’t. The desperation is unreal. Continue crying 😭😭😭
Bertrude Magooglepop tweet media
English
49
110
771
51.7K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@meek__01 It’s a nice thread. People who keep using the screenshot of the rules don’t caveat that the rule is about on target shot
English
2
0
1
61
Meek
Meek@meek__01·
@PJayDet Same thing I'm saying, and I'm glad this might really educate some of them that comes across it
English
1
0
2
611
Meek
Meek@meek__01·
Bruno Fernandes' record 21st assist probably shouldn't exist. And the rules that prove it came from Man United fans themselves. Here's what happened: Fernandes whipped in a corner, Dorgu's header hit the crossbar, came down, hit Verbruggen's hand and went into the net. The Premier League officially credited it as a Dorgu goal and a Bruno Fernandes assist. Record broken. Then the replays came out. United fans started sharing a screenshot of the Premier League's own published rules titled "When is it NOT an own goal?" thinking it proved the goal was correctly given to Dorgu. Here's the painful irony, that image actually builds the case AGAINST Bruno's assist. Here's exactly why. The PL rules only protect attacker goal credit in two specific situations: 1. ON-TARGET DEFLECTIONS — If an attacking player shoots a ball that is already on target and it deflects off a defender on its way past the goalkeeper, the goal stays with the attacker. The defender's touch is just considered a deflection. 2. GOALKEEPER FUMBLES — If an attacking shot on goal is stopped but the goalkeeper fumbles and accidentally pushes it over the line, it is credited to the shooter. The critical word in BOTH cases is ON TARGET. A ball that hits the crossbar or post is by definition OFF TARGET. It is logged as a missed shot in every official stats system including Opta, the PL's own data partner. The goal was already not happening. At the moment that ball struck the crossbar, Dorgu's header was a miss. So when Verbruggen's hand then redirected it into the net, he was not fumbling an on-target shot. He was accidentally diverting a ball that had already missed the goal. Neither of the two protection rules applies here. By the Premier League's own published rules, that is an own goal, Verbruggen OG, not Dorgu goal. Now here's where it gets even more brutal for we the United fans If the Premier League's Goal Accreditation Panel reviewed this and ruled it a Verbruggen own goal, Bruno Fernandes would lose his assist completely. This is another PL rule most people don't know, own goals cannot have assists. It doesn't matter how good the corner was, how deliberately it was delivered or how directly it led to the goal. The moment it becomes an OG, the assist simply disappears from the record. Bruno would drop from 21 back to 20 and level with Kevin De Bruyne and Thierry Henry, not above them. No outright record. Can the panel actually change it now? Technically yes. The Goal Accreditation Panel has no strict published deadline for reviews. But will they? Almost certainly not. The season ended today. The Premier League has already posted the record celebration on their official account. Bruno Fernandes was named Premier League Player of the Season just yesterday. The record has been publicly confirmed at the highest level. Reversing it now would mean the PL publicly embarrassing themselves by walking back their own official announcement hours after making it. So Bruno almost certainly keeps the record, not because the rules clearly support the decision, but because football admin does not reopen finished seasons, and nobody with the power to change it has any incentive to do so. I'm a Man United fan. I want the record to stand. But bias doesn't change what the rules actually say.
English
291
63
499
113.4K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@Maxiishim_ You need to have better reading comprehension and understand because this only for ON target shots not OFF target.
Meek@meek__01

Bruno Fernandes' record 21st assist probably shouldn't exist. And the rules that prove it came from Man United fans themselves. Here's what happened: Fernandes whipped in a corner, Dorgu's header hit the crossbar, came down, hit Verbruggen's hand and went into the net. The Premier League officially credited it as a Dorgu goal and a Bruno Fernandes assist. Record broken. Then the replays came out. United fans started sharing a screenshot of the Premier League's own published rules titled "When is it NOT an own goal?" thinking it proved the goal was correctly given to Dorgu. Here's the painful irony, that image actually builds the case AGAINST Bruno's assist. Here's exactly why. The PL rules only protect attacker goal credit in two specific situations: 1. ON-TARGET DEFLECTIONS — If an attacking player shoots a ball that is already on target and it deflects off a defender on its way past the goalkeeper, the goal stays with the attacker. The defender's touch is just considered a deflection. 2. GOALKEEPER FUMBLES — If an attacking shot on goal is stopped but the goalkeeper fumbles and accidentally pushes it over the line, it is credited to the shooter. The critical word in BOTH cases is ON TARGET. A ball that hits the crossbar or post is by definition OFF TARGET. It is logged as a missed shot in every official stats system including Opta, the PL's own data partner. The goal was already not happening. At the moment that ball struck the crossbar, Dorgu's header was a miss. So when Verbruggen's hand then redirected it into the net, he was not fumbling an on-target shot. He was accidentally diverting a ball that had already missed the goal. Neither of the two protection rules applies here. By the Premier League's own published rules, that is an own goal, Verbruggen OG, not Dorgu goal. Now here's where it gets even more brutal for we the United fans If the Premier League's Goal Accreditation Panel reviewed this and ruled it a Verbruggen own goal, Bruno Fernandes would lose his assist completely. This is another PL rule most people don't know, own goals cannot have assists. It doesn't matter how good the corner was, how deliberately it was delivered or how directly it led to the goal. The moment it becomes an OG, the assist simply disappears from the record. Bruno would drop from 21 back to 20 and level with Kevin De Bruyne and Thierry Henry, not above them. No outright record. Can the panel actually change it now? Technically yes. The Goal Accreditation Panel has no strict published deadline for reviews. But will they? Almost certainly not. The season ended today. The Premier League has already posted the record celebration on their official account. Bruno Fernandes was named Premier League Player of the Season just yesterday. The record has been publicly confirmed at the highest level. Reversing it now would mean the PL publicly embarrassing themselves by walking back their own official announcement hours after making it. So Bruno almost certainly keeps the record, not because the rules clearly support the decision, but because football admin does not reopen finished seasons, and nobody with the power to change it has any incentive to do so. I'm a Man United fan. I want the record to stand. But bias doesn't change what the rules actually say.

English
0
0
1
296
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@PoojaMedia I don’t get how people don’t understand that hitting the woodwork is an off target shot
English
1
0
1
132
POOJA!!!
POOJA!!!@PoojaMedia·
From this, it showed it was an Own Goal from the GK. Dorgu's ball hit the target before it was deflected him. If a ball hit the cross bar = Off Target.
POOJA!!! tweet media
English
1.2K
126
2.1K
186.1K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@UtdActive Its funny how you conveniently left out this is for shots on target and not shots off target I.e hitting the bar and then going in due to a deflection of the keeper. It’s strictly an OG in any facet and there’s many examples of this where it’s been given as an OG
English
1
0
0
90
Heki
Heki@hekitike9·
Thank you Anfield for this incredible first year. Thank you for the love and support throughout the season, just like you’re still showing me today… I can’t wait to be back among y’all A special and heartfelt thought for my partner the legend himself @MohamedSalah Thank you for the all good advices, you are the example to follow here. Wishing the best to my guy Andrew Robertson, your character will be missed ❤️…
Heki tweet mediaHeki tweet media
English
308
3.5K
37.6K
437.3K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@Maxiishim_ Wasn’t on target was it though? Any shot hitting the post or crossbar is always deemed off target 😂
English
0
0
12
651
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@lukestanley03 Yeah it’s an OG but corrupt PL havnt said anything yet
English
22
16
713
115.2K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@UTDKarra None of these happened. A shot hitting the bar is an off target shot looool
English
0
0
3
907
Kara
Kara@UTDKarra·
Just help me repost so Arsenal and Manchester City fans crying that Bruno Fernandes broke their beloved Henry and De Bruyne record can continue crying 😭
Kara tweet media
English
140
763
3K
137.9K
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@UtdActive How is it an opinion that this is not an og? Hits the bar and clearly goes in from the back of Verbruggens hand
English
0
0
1
227
Matthew
Matthew@MattRobinson_99·
@Reggieboy1989 @StokeyyG2 Shot that hits the post and hits the keeper’s head and goes it, I swear they’re always own goals?
English
2
0
5
836
Tee Jay
Tee Jay@PJayDet·
@Reggieboy1989 @StokeyyG2 This doesn’t make any sense because there’s been many times where own goals are given when a keeper dives after it hits the post and rebounds back off him into the net. There’s no such thing as an accidental action not meaning it’s an own goal
English
0
0
25
618
Alex Vollo
Alex Vollo@AlexVolloFPL·
Don't be shocked if there are loads of massive DEFCON changes tonight. The amount of replays during today's games was crazy, which probably means a lot of DEFCON actions happened off-camera.
English
4
4
141
61.3K