Sanjju
512 posts













gm stabblors! We hear you. After listening to the community, we’ve decided to re-evaluate the submissions and will be redistributing the prize pool to better reflect the quality and impact of the content in our recent Super Earn bounty. Thanks to everyone who participated, we appreciate your creativity and support. Winners will be updated and rewards distributed this week.





gm stabblors! We hear you. After listening to the community, we’ve decided to re-evaluate the submissions and will be redistributing the prize pool to better reflect the quality and impact of the content in our recent Super Earn bounty. Thanks to everyone who participated, we appreciate your creativity and support. Winners will be updated and rewards distributed this week.

I didn't really care about the @stabbleorg bounty, but I was rooting for my friends who participated. Still happy a member of @SuperteamNG did take home a prize. But at the same time, I refuse to shy away from the truth. It's one thing to do a random pick rather than a fair outlook of every submission(if it's stated in the description) or do a popularity contest. But awarding first place to a bot is just diabolical 🤷♂️ What is fairness if only the people who stand to lose are the ones who spend hours researching and working on a bounty? 📌If bounty hunters stand a chance of being penalized. Bounty sponsors(projects) should be flagged for things like this.

























