PaleRider1980

@Cerberus103199 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Who said anything about 2016?

@PRider1980 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Why TF would you think 2016 is a conglomerate data set? JFC people are stupid.

Does anyone dispute these facts…in March of 2020 there was a nationwide panic that was based on an imperial college study that suggested that covid had a 3-4% fatality rate. Policy was crafted based on that study. By May everyone knew that those estimates were over stated by about 500x. The new information would have never caused a panic…but the ball was already rolling…what did I get wrong?

@Cerberus103199 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Here's a visual aid to help you.

@Cerberus103199 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok What is the standard deviation of 2020 vs. the 16 years prior?

@Cerberus103199 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Post a link to where a US news service claimed millions of people died from covid in the US.

@PRider1980 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Another lie to conceal the last, but I'm accustomed to your lot playing that game. We absolutely were told by a liberal media that MILLIONS WERE DYING! Denying that only affirms your commitment to ignoring facts.

@Cerberus103199 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok I see a deviation in a trend. Maybe it's just me.

@DQuinn1575 @PRider1980 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Saying things like "obviously" doesn't make things tried, especially in the world of mathematics. Your conviction to supporting the lie is really the anomalie here

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Your illogic is truly something to behold.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Certificate

This has happened to so many good doctors , scientists , lawyers and others who have raised concerns and asked questions about the safety and efficacy of the Covid ‘vaccines’. It’s their only defence mechanism as they can’t enter into debate on the shots as all the evidence shows they are neither safe nor effective. Too many powerful and rich people will fall if the narrative changes so they and their controlled vassals stick with it even though it’s untenable.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Thanks for confirming the 34% of covid death certs that cite only part 1 conditions don't have any pre-existing conditions listed. Those people sound healthy.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen No, genius, Part 1 is the chain-of-event (COVID → pneumonia → respiratory failure → death), not pre-existing. But the CDC explicitly counts both Part 1 and Part 2 when they report the 94% with at least one comorbidity and average 4 additional conditions per certificate.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Hey moron, the chain of event conditions cited on those 119K death certs all came from covid. That's why they're listed in part 1.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Lmao, What is 34% of 350,000? 119k, but that’s Part II only (no pre-existing chronic conditions listed). The CDC’s full stat (both Part I chain-of-event and Part II) is 94% with at least one comorbidity, average 4 additional conditions per certificate.

@Cerberus103199 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok No one ever claimed all ~1.2 million US covid deaths all happened in 2020.

@PRider1980 @DQuinn1575 @_PsychedOut @jimiuorio @grok Again, not age adjusted data, BUT, look at 20 over 19. 0.5M isn't millions as professed - repeatedly. We also know suicide and accidental death went through the roof. So, there are only two choices from your end, either it was hyperbole then or it's lying now.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Loooooool. So if a complete cert lists the causal pathway in part 1, a cert that doesn't list the causal pathway in part 1 is incomplete. Thanks for confirming the 5% - 6% stat is incomplete covid death certs. See what you can do when you put your mind to it?

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen conditions per certificate.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Are the conditions in part 1 pre-existing?

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Lmao, 34% of 2020 certs had nothing in Part 2? That’s Part II only, clown. The CDC’s full stat (both Part I chain-of-event and Part II) is 94% with at least one comorbidity, average 4 additional conditions per certificate.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen What is 34% of 350,000? Use a calculator if it helps you.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Zero math disproving the 94% comorbidity stat, Zero study with higher absolute benefit than 0.01% healthy / 0.07–0.2% high-risk, Zero competent, non-insult argument You've had every chance to prove me wrong. You've proved nothing except that you can't.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen What would it take for the death cert to be not "somewhat incomplete"? Be specific.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen That’s you desperately clinging to one sentence from the CDC blog while ignoring the rest, clown. The blog says when only COVID is listed, the statement is “somewhat incomplete” because the certifier didn’t spell out the full pathway (COVID → pneumonia → respiratory failure)

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen It's not rare genius. It's the two most common chain of event conditions. And 34% of US covid death certs in 2020 had nothing in part 2. What is 34% of 350,000?

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Lmao, You posted one rare ‘pure COVID’ certificate with nothing in Part 2 and think it’s a slam dunk? That’s the 5–6% group the CDC has always reported. The other 94% had at least one comorbidity, average 4 additional conditions per certificate (both Part I and Part II).

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen The operative word in that sentence is "incomplete." You even typed it.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen COVID as the cause, but Part I is “somewhat incomplete” because they didn’t spell out the full pathway (COVID → pneumonia → respiratory failure).

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen What pre-existing conditions does the following death cert have: Part 1 covid (underlying cause) -> pneumonia -> respiratory failure -> death Part 2 None

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen The CDC still counts those cases in the overall stats: 94% of COVID deaths had at least one comorbidity, average 4 additional conditions per certificate (both Part I and Part II).

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Hahahahahahahaa. The interview literally says a covid death cert with an empty part 1 is incomplete. Hey look, you're back to being illiterate.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen chain-of-event conditions.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen What pre-existing conditions are there on a death cert with an empty part 2?

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen additional conditions per certificate. You still are not proving anything clown.

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen "In cases where only COVID-19 is reported, the certifier is indicating that COVID-19 was the cause of death, but really they left it – the cause of death statement – somewhat incomplete.  They neglected to provide the entire causal pathway." Meaning part 1 is incomplete nimrod.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen Source clown lmao

@JonJon41691378 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen The 5% - 6% is not the proportion of "healthy" people that died from covid. It's the proportion of incomplete covid death certs dumbass.

@PRider1980 @MikeKon219 @ABridgen That’s you celebrating a fake strawman victory again, clown. I never based my argument on the tiny 5–6% “pure COVID” group (zero conditions in either Part I or Part II).