Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Amnesia
3.4K posts

Amnesia
@Pakyoukaogag
Tabula rasa means when you were a child you started with a sponge-like mind or whatever stage you started to be conscious. A blank state soaking "it" all up.
Katılım Nisan 2014
720 Takip Edilen117 Takipçiler
Amnesia retweetledi

there's only one way to remain relevant and profitable in AI...
and it's REALLY important, so listen to this
obsessing over "mastering" Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or OpenClaw will take you nowhere, it's a completely wrong approach
simply because we're in a market that changes every 3 months:
> new model drops
> everyone's mind is blown
> old workflows are obsolete
> you're back to square one
if you're trying to become "very good" at THIS specific tool... you're already behind because by the time you master it, there's a better one
the tools are temporary... the skills are permanent, here's what actually keeps you relevant:
develop AI skills that transcend the tools:
- context engineering principles
- AI workflow design (when to use AI vs when not to)
- quality control systems (catching hallucinations, maintaining consistency)
- integration thinking (connecting multiple agents into one system)
these skills transfer, no matter what model launches next month... you can adapt in hours, not months
your business stays profitable because you're not tied to one tool - you're building systems that work regardless of which AI is "winning" this quarter
English

To prevent a future like the one in this picture, open source has to win.
(And it’s already happening, look at all those posts about people waiting for usage limit resets)
But most great developers chase money and work for corporations - which isn't a bad thing, you have to make a living.
They work for these companies, only to be the first ones mass-laid off under the excuse of cost-cutting.
The biggest problem with open source is always living expenses.
Only a tiny fraction of famous developers can actually survive through sponsorships or money from their own businesses.
But most of the amazing open-source developers I've talked to are worrying about rent, despite making incredible contributions.
I really want to solve this fundamental problem.

English

@jun_song Because open source means you're on your own. The majority will be sacrificed for the sake of freedom but in reality they are only used for those who've been selected to survive. No different from those who depend on convenience only the "Idea" of freedom.
English
Amnesia retweetledi

I’m shocked to see how little people care about the escalating situation in the bond market. I guess they simply don’t understand what’s happening. So let me put in simple words - your government spent so much that no one wants to lend it anymore, and it’s about to go bankrupt. But it has this friend, called the central bank, which has a magic printer in his basement that can produce an infinite amount of dollars. So the central bank is going to bail out your government.
But here’s the thing - the magic printer can’t print real wealth. Whenever it spits out dollars, it is stealing some of the purchasing power of your savings. It’s as though it is reaching out with a very long straw, drinking your milkshake.
That’s right, it is YOU who will be bailing out your government, whether you like it or not, until the currency is worthless and you have no more savings. Are you angry yet?
Good. Now go and get yourself some #silver .

English

@multiplanet1 Why create a human being in the first place? To have a cute thing by their side and alleviate loneliness? Motivation or inspiration? To make them feel consciousness like elon/fathers have? Or maybe to serve the system to delay collapse?
English

Elon Musk's children will inherit almost nothing.
He's said this publicly and nobody paid attention because it contradicts every assumption people have about billionaires. The richest man in history plans to give his children no meaningful financial inheritance.
This is not a tax strategy. It's a philosophy. And once you understand it, you understand why Musk operates differently than every other billionaire alive.
The logic starts with his father.
Errol Musk was wealthy. Owned emerald mines in Zambia. Young Elon grew up around money. He has described his relationship with his father as the most damaging element of his entire childhood. Not the money itself. What the money did to the family's character.
He's said directly that inherited wealth destroyed more potential in his family than poverty ever could have. His father used money as control. As identity. As substitute for character.
When Elon left South Africa at 17 with almost nothing, he was running from inherited wealth as much as he was running toward opportunity.
Everything he's built since then has been fueled by a refusal to become his father.
This is the key that unlocks every confusing Musk decision.
Why does he work 100 hours a week when he could retire and live better than any king in history? Because stopping would mean he's just a man who has money. Like his father.
Why does he keep starting new companies when he could coast on Tesla and SpaceX forever? Because coasting would mean he's living off past success. Like inheriting. Like his father.
Why does he sleep on factory floors and wear the same clothes and live in a prefab house in Texas? Because luxury would mean he values money over mission. Like his father.
Why will his children inherit almost nothing? Because giving them money would do to them what his father's money did to his family.
Every project, every company, every 18 hour day, every factory floor nap is downstream of one psychological wound. The absolute refusal to become his father.
This is not weakness. This is the most powerful fuel source available to a human being.
A person running toward something can stop when they get tired. A person running from something never stops because the thing they're running from is inside them. It travels with them. There is no finish line. The fuel never runs out.
Most people look at Musk and see ambition.
I look at Musk and see a man who decided at 17 that he would rather build everything from nothing than live off anything from someone else.
That decision echoes in every rocket launch. Every factory. Every sleepless night.
The inheritance his children will receive is not money.
It's the example of what a human can build when he refuses to become his father.
That's worth more than any trust fund ever created.
English

anthropic is charging 6x for fast mode on opus 4.7. that is not a typo.
standard opus 4.7: $5 per million input tokens, $25 per million output tokens. fast mode on opus 4.7: $30 input, $150 output. literal 6x on both sides.
even worse, fast mode bypasses your subscription entirely. your $200 a month max plan does not cover it. from the very first token in fast mode, every single token is billed to extra usage at the 6x rate. mid-conversation toggle? the entire context gets re-billed at 6x uncached.
the trade-off they are selling: 2.5x faster output for 6x cost. you are paying 2.4x more per unit of speed gained.
as of today, opus 4.7 becomes the default fast mode model. toggle /fast by reflex, wake up to a bill you didn't expect.
this is why i keep saying buy a gpu.

English

@_The_Prophet__ Real life is not even real. What is REAL even means? When life feels like a dream is there really a right or wrong way to live?
English

⚡️The deeper signal is youth risk did not disappear.
It migrated inward.
Teen drinking fell because the old physical world of adolescence got dismantled. Alcohol belonged to a social ecosystem: unsupervised time, cars, parties, local jobs, malls, basements, boredom, flirting, older siblings, house gatherings, and the chaotic peer world where teenagers learned who they were by colliding with other people in real space.
That ecosystem was replaced by phones, surveillance, parental tracking, algorithmic entertainment, social anxiety, online status games, and a much thinner physical commons.
So the surface looks healthier. Fewer kids drinking. Fewer kids using weed. Fewer kids doing reckless things in public.
The hidden layer looks worse. The young are less reckless because they are less socially embodied. Less initiation. Less unsupervised friction. Less courage-building. Less embarrassment and recovery. Less real dating. Less independence. Less contact with the physical world before adulthood demands it.
The old teenage world produced damage, stupidity, alcohol abuse, pregnancy risk, fights, accidents, and bad decisions. No need to romanticize it. But it also produced social reps. It forced young people through discomfort. It made them practice attraction, rejection, conflict, reputation, risk, repair, and status in the open.
The new world suppresses visible risk while increasing invisible fragility.
That is the trade.
A teenager can avoid drinking, avoid parties, avoid sex, avoid driving, avoid real confrontation, avoid rejection, avoid shame, avoid danger, and still arrive at 23 emotionally underbuilt. Cleaner behavior does not automatically mean stronger formation.
This is why the marriage chart and the teen drinking chart are the same story at different stages. People are not suddenly failing to pair in adulthood. The whole pathway into embodied adulthood has been slowing for years before marriage even becomes the question.
The real truth: society solved part of the teen vice problem by shrinking the arena where teenagers become adults.
It took away the dangerous commons and replaced it with controlled isolation.
The result is safer kids with weaker initiation into real life.
Grant Bailey@grantjbailey
Huge collapse in drinking among high schoolers 👀
English
Amnesia retweetledi

I found the best way to bankrupt the government.
It comes from a Russian quantum physicist.
---
In 2004, a man named Vadim Zeland wrote a book titled, "Reality Transurfing."
In the book, he introduces a concept called “pendulums” that explains why fighting the government never works.
The government's operation is absurd.
-$39 trillion in debt
-Funding wars you never voted for
-Printing money whenever they want
-Endlessly taxing you in every direction
-Selling new bonds to pay off old bonds
-Politicians retiring as multimillionaires on $174,000 salaries
But here’s the thing…
Accountability won’t come from the system. That’s why Zeland’s concept of “pendulums” is so important.
A pendulum is anything that lives off your attention and emotion (energy-in-motion).
Religions, political movements, businesses, group chats, diet trends… these are all pendulums that feed on attention and energy.
If the world collectively withdrew its energy from Buddhism, Buddhism would dissolve.
If America collectively withdrew its energy from the Democratic or Republican party, it would dissolve.
It’s like food to a person. If you stop giving it food, it will die.
Your government is a pendulum, but… there's a key point to understand.
The government feeds on your attention and your energy. But that is not its primary food source.
Its primary food source is fiat money. The money they print, control, and force you to use.
They have an unlimited supply of it. They can tax it however they want. They get to enforce the rules around it. Their money endlessly feeds them, by design.
That’s why you can vote whoever you want into office, but nothing will change — because the money hasn’t changed. Their primary source of fuel hasn’t changed.
The pendulum stays alive as long as their money stays alive.
That’s the key thing to understand. The money is the target.
If you actually want to end the government’s fraud, you have to stop using their money. You have to withdraw your energy from their system. You have to starve them.
You do that by starving the source of their food. If they can’t eat, they will die. If they don’t have their money, they will die.
If the government didn’t have an infinite source of money that they control at will, they could never rack up $39 trillion in debt. But because they *do* have an infinite source of money that they control at will, they have an endless source of food.
That’s the target.
It was never the politicians. It was always the money.
So how do you actually starve the pendulum?
Zeland gives us the answer — he calls it “extinguishing the pendulum.”
Every pendulum has a script it expects you to follow. The script is designed to provoke a reaction out of you, to get you to swing your energy toward the pendulum.
It wants to hook you like a fish.
For example, think of a hostile comment you receive online. That comment is a pendulum. It wants your energy.
When you defend yourself, think about a clever reply, escalate, hurl an insult back — you feed it.
The pendulum doesn’t care if you agree or disagree. It just wants your energy.
Complaining about the government only feeds the pendulum of the government. It’s exactly what the government wants. It wants you to bite. It wants to keep you in its frequency. It wants to keep you in its game.
So how do you actually win?
You don’t.
You leave the game.
Extinguishing the pendulum means breaking the script.
You break the script by offering an abnormal response.
When a pendulum tries to provoke you, you do something completely off-script, something that doesn’t fit the game it’s trying to play.
You shift to a different frequency and play a different game.
Suddenly, the pendulum has nothing to grab onto.
The best way to bankrupt the government is simple:
You stop using their money.
The government’s entire script is dependent on you using their money.
Their monetary system is designed to feed them energy.
When you work for their money, they tax it.
When you spend their money, they tax it.
When you hold their money, they quietly steal it through inflation.
Here’s the devastating part.
To function in modern life, you need money — and the fiat monetary system is designed as a monopoly.
They create legal tender laws which mandate the use of their money — and their money only — for taxes and debts.
If you don’t pay your taxes in their money, you get fined, your assets get seized, or you get sent to jail.
They coerce you into their pendulum under the threat of violence.
It’s the trap inside the trap. It’s not just that they feed on fiat money. It’s that they’ve made it illegal to not use fiat money.
For as long as fiat governments have existed, there was no true off-script move.
You could complain. You could vote. You could move countries, only to find another version of the same system awaiting you.
You were always left inside their monetary system. You were always hooked to their pendulum.
The only real exit was leaving the grid entirely. You would have to stop using money, close your bank accounts, and disengage from modern life altogether.
People’s yearning to live “off-grid” is simply a desire to escape the fiat pendulum.
But they made it inescapable.
Until 2009.
---
Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin to be the off-script move.
The abnormal response.
The different game.
Bitcoin was designed to extinguish the pendulum of fiat.
Previously, it could never be done, because there was never a different frequency to shift to, other than going completely off-grid.
Bitcoin is, for the first time, the truly different frequency of money that you can shift to.
It doesn’t argue with fiat.
It doesn’t demand accountability.
It doesn’t run for office.
It doesn’t ask for permission.
It doesn’t try to reform the Fed, or audit gold, or pass legislation.
It doesn’t even acknowledge fiat as a worthy opponent.
It simply exists as a completely different frequency, governed by a completely different set of rules:
1. The protocol is neutral — it has no political ties.
2. The system is transparent — you can verify the rules for yourself.
3. The supply is fixed — it cannot be inflated.
4. The network is permissionless — you don't need permission from banks and governments to use it.
5. The protocol is decentralized — there is no central party manipulating the system.
6. The supply issuance is based on math — not what a group of elites thinks is best.
Every single one of those traits is the dead opposite of fiat.
Bitcoin swings the pendulum of money in the opposite direction — and that’s exactly what’s required to extinguish fiat.
No matter who you’ve voted for, the government hasn’t changed.
The system remains the same, because the money remains the same.
The off-script move isn’t to vote with your ballot. That’s the script fiat wants you to follow.
The off-script move is to vote with your money.
The off-script move is to stop using their money and shift to a different game.
That’s how you stop feeding the government.
That’s how you starve the pendulum.
The best part?
Zeland notes that when you extinguish a pendulum, its energy doesn’t disappear.
It returns to you.
Every dollar you hold in fiat is energy you’ve been losing your whole life — to inflation, to taxes, to a government with trillions in debt.
When you shift to Bitcoin, all of that energy comes back to you.
What previously went to the government and all their closest friends now flows to you.
That difference in energy is the pendulum being extinguished in real-time.
It’s the power shifting from the top of the system to you.
You don’t have to protest.
You don’t have to wait for an election.
You don’t have to vote anybody into office.
You can stop feeding their system, right now.
Bitcoin exists, right now. The network is open. For anybody, at any time.
All you have to do is shift.
That’s how it ends.

English

@coinbureau Then what pay mortgage and work 9-5? People should not just end aging but end the snake inverted world. How? start with money.
English

🚨 15 YEAR OLD QUANTUM PRODIGY PIVOTS TO SOLVE HUMAN AGING WITH AI.
Laurent Simons just earned a PhD in quantum physics from the University of Antwerp at age 15. Instead of remaining in theoretical physics he is immediately launching a second doctorate focused entirely on medical science and artificial intelligence.
His explicit goal is to deconstruct human aging. He is combining quantum principles with AI models to map out biological systems and accelerate disease prevention.

English

@incentivising But if you are really dumb its better to be perceived as a threat.
English

I have seen intelligent people destroy their careers by never learning to play dumb strategically. And game theory explains why: in most high-stakes hierarchies, influence is perceived as a zero-sum game. If you appear "too intelligent," you are perceived as a threat. That locks you out of important networks. Let the others feel superior for a while, and hide your intelligence until deployment.
English






