Sabitlenmiş Tweet
"Do you own research" ≠ Knowing how to find credible research and actually read & interpret it.
Cant believe it has to be said, but people on this platform who are competent enough will understand why.
English
Teja Paladugu
210 posts
Teja Paladugu
@PaladRx
Med-Student ◇ U.S. Army Officer ◇ Fmr. Chairman @OhioCrs ◇ Views are my own and not the views of the U.S. Army or DoW
Ohio, USA Katılım Şubat 2022
453 Takip Edilen57 Takipçiler
@JamesPa24472406 @Arc_LightStrike @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory Plus your responses dont even make sense to the original discussion, so youre arguing with a brick wall here
English
@JamesPa24472406 @Arc_LightStrike @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory I posed a question in earnest and didnt condemn anyone for their position. Very much could have responded with a "Hey, thats not accurate, and here is why" then back it up. Now you're strawmanning and picking fights on the internet for no reason. Cant help you here 🤷♂️
English
Cancer rates have exploded in patients under 50 after the rollout of the Covid shots.
- Brain tumors +19.5%
- Colon cancer +19.4%
- Small intestine cancer +15.5%
- Ovarian cancer +12.8%
- Stomach cancer +7.3%
- Breast cancer +3.6%
@DrKellyVictory
English
@OKIEMAGA1962 Engage with the argument instead of appealing to authority. Intellectual fallacy otherwise.
English
@PaladRx By your own tag line, your only a med student. So, I'm going with someone who's been reading these things for decades.
English
What a bogus study. Unsurprisingly its not peer-reviewed. They took the ACM, lined it up with what they arbitrarily presumed was the period of vaccinations, and then attributed every death in the excess to vaccines. There are no controls in the study. Theres no system to actually diagnose a vaccine-mediated death. And their argument hinges on excess deaths that coincidentally line up with Omicron. Then they extrapolate this faulty data and project a 17,000,000 something number using this. With their study methods if a mass earthquake, tsunami, etc. suddenly killed thousands of people, all of those people would also get factored in as "vaccine deaths".
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970
Bret Weinstein Confirms What The International Crisis Summit Said..."17 MILLION PEOPLE Have Been Killed By The COVID 19 mRNA Vaccine." "It's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this DANGEROUS."
English
Id love to investigate, and i reckon there already are papers out there assessing a statistically significant correlation. But you're fighting an imaginary battle here. The original topic was addressing the validity of data that was posted, not whether this concern ought to be investigated or not.
English
@Arc_LightStrike @PaladRx @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory No one is arguing cancer rates haven't been increasing for years. When there are sudden spikes in aggressive Stage 4 cancers post C19 vax rollout being reported around the world you don't think that is worth investigating, and that maybe, just maybe, there could be a connection?
English
@JamesPa24472406 @Arc_LightStrike @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory Going to point you back to the first sentence x.com/i/status/20509…
Teja Paladugu@PaladRx
Wasn't this largely due to diagnostic delays because of the pandemic leading to an artificial spike in incidence reports? Additionally most of these cancers have a clear trend line going up for the last 2 decades, well before Covid was a thing. This could be reasonably explained by a mix of actual cancer rates going up and also improved cancer screening leading to more reports.
English
I dont believe its generally discounted, but rather the pathologic symptoms of a slew of infections are less desirable than the prospect of the stronger immune response to re-infection down the line.
Toughing out a Rhinovirus infection or something is one thing, but im sure people would not want to "tough out" rabies.
Everything in medicine is fundamentally measured on a cost-benefit analysis, and its irresponsible of anyone to say otherwise.
English
@DrSuneelDhand Natural immunity yields antibodies against a variety of epitopes, while vaccines elicit a specific antibody response. It’s not about being a “stronger” or “weaker” response, but being a broader response when it’s natural. Public health was wrong to discount natural immunity.
English
This is VERY disappointing
It’s never desirable to get an infection. But it is scientifically impossible for antibodies after a real infection to be “weaker” than antibodies from a vaccine
Natural immunity will always yield stronger antibodies
Dr Saphier should retract this
Toby Rogers@uTobian
In this clip from Dec. 16, 2020, Surgeon General nominee @NBSaphierMD claims that "immunity from vaccines tends to be stronger, more robust, and longer lasting than natural immunity from exposure." This is a lie. Dr. Saphier is a Pharma bot who regurgitates the official script.
English
@LeeKurtiss @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory Im not knowledgeable enough to give an answer to that, but I would reckon its at least hard to tell when you have only like 3 or so data points on the graph post-covid and post-vaccination rollout. Maybe the shape would look cleaner if you filtered by month instead of year.
English
@PaladRx @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory Wouldn't a diagnostic delay be a sharp jagged line, not a curve?
English
The chart goes till 2023. Also you wouldn't expect it to go down like the flip of a switch. There would be a weaning off period, especially when you consider every person with cancer who didnt get a screening appointment during covid doesnt suddenly show up the next year to get screened. The infrastructure for the screening remains the same, if not less compared to pre-covid, so screening rates would logically slow down.
English
@PaladRx @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory tl/dr No
Diagnostic delays might impact the following year, declining thereafter. We see an increase with a plateau.
English
Cancer is a metabolic disease - and lactic acid can directly cause it.
You can measure lactic acid (lactate) for cheap today to get a handle on your odds of getting cancer.
Recent studies show that lactate levels in blood are directly related to cancer development.
Often thought of a waste product of metabolism - lactic acid actually acts as a signaling molecule both within immune and tumor cells to initiate and worsen the disease.
Lactate can directly modify gene transcription for better survival of cancer cells, and even induce processes like angiogenesis which make cancers more aggressive.
Meanwhile - therapies that inhibit lactic acid production (DCA, High dose thiamine, Methylene blue, ALA) have shown the ability to shrink tumors in experiments.
Dalton (Analyze & Optimize)@Outdoctrination
Cancer starts in the mitochondria, & fixing them might treat it - a groundbreaking study shows it more clearly than ever. (🧵1/8)
English
@JamesPa24472406 @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory Idc what side of the argument the research comes from. If its disingenuous or a bad interpretation of what is being presented, then im going to call it out 🤷♂️. It just seems that this happens in one direction more than the other.
English
@PaladRx @MaryBowdenMD @DrKellyVictory ANYTHING but the clot shots, right? The desperation/denialism of the Covid cult never ceases to entertain.
English
How does this happen?
Somehow the mainstream will find a way to blame...
- COVID
- The unvaccinated
- Climate change
- Systemic racism
We see patients who were injured by these vaccines every single day.
Time to pull them from the market.
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD
Cancer rates have exploded in patients under 50 after the rollout of the Covid shots. - Brain tumors +19.5% - Colon cancer +19.4% - Small intestine cancer +15.5% - Ovarian cancer +12.8% - Stomach cancer +7.3% - Breast cancer +3.6% @DrKellyVictory
English
They're saying the vaccine groups have around half the risk of all cause mortality, which is *less* than the unvaccinated group. That being said, the reduction is a lot greater than what would reasonably be expected, and the authors acknowledge its probably a statistical artifact and the actual reduction is less than that.
English
@PaladRx @myhiddenvalue Half the risk is an increase in all cause mortality.
Deep
English
1. First Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
2. Second Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
3. CDC data shows 138,000+ excess cancer deaths in the U.S. since the beginning of mass mRNA vaccination: theethicalskeptic.com/2026/03/13/the…
4. Systematic Review Documents 300+ Peer-Reviewed COVID Shot Turbo Cancer Cases Across 27 Countries: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41498242/
5. mRNA "Vaccine" Genomic integration Demonstrated: ijirms.in/index.php/ijir…
6. mRNA Injections Induce Severe, Long-Lasting Genetic Disruption Linked to Cancer and Chronic Disease: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
7. mRNA "Vaccine" Spike Protein Detected in Both the Cytoplasm and Nuclei of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41076388/
8. First Peer-Reviewed Paper Defines COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Turbo Cancer: journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n0…
9. 17 Ways mRNA Shots Induce Cancer, According to 100 Studies: thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna…
English
The conclusion also mentions there was a significant decrease in all cause mortality + the elevated cancer hospitalization rates were inconsistent and disappeared entirely when the lag time was extended to 365 days.
Additionally in the paper the test group with 3 or more vaccine administrations showed a lower risk at the 365 day lag, which is exactly the opposite of what youd expect if the vaccines caused increased cancer risk.
English
@baard2000 @myhiddenvalue The authors are speculating for further research, not drawing a definitive conclusion. They literally mention that their results are likley due to confounding bias.
English
The conclusion also mentions there was a significant decrease in all cause mortality + the elevated cancer hospitalization rates were inconsistent and disappeared entirely when the lag time was extended to 365 days.
Additionally in the paper the test group with 3 or more vaccine administrations showed a lower risk at the 365 day lag, which is exactly the opposite of what youd expect if the vaccines caused increased cancer risk.
English
@Hennadepenna @myhiddenvalue The authors are speculating for further research, not drawing a definitive conclusion. They literally mention that their results are likley due to confounding bias.
English
@Carl0vj3 @IanCopeland5 The absence of evidence is not proof for the contrary
English
@IanCopeland5 And what is your proof they don’t cause autism? My view is we can’t say with absolute certainty either way.
English
Your proof that vaccines cause autism are commentaries, reviews and associations.
You're a joke...
Andrew Zywiec, M.D.@AndrewZywiecMD
There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism ...except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism: ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947 ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092 Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism ▪️ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883 ... and autism being listed in the inserts....
English
There isnt any complicated word play going on here. Im not interested in rough housing to "win" an internet argument.
It just seems to me that your understanding of biology is not as in depth and nuanced as you believe it to be, which is why I keep giving you the opportunity to clarify your position so that my assumptions can be proven untrue.
English
@PaladRx Let's not be pedantic here and how about instead of trying to trip me up, which you won't be able to do, why don't you start making your counter argument, if you even have one?
I'm not quite sure what you're actually attempting here, besides trying to trip me up....
English
Sometimes you have to let the Dunning-Krugers get an absolute victory in their misinformed goals so that they have no excuses to make when everything starts crumbling down in front of them.
DC_Draino@DC_Draino
How much you want to bet that autism rates will now go down after the child vaccine schedule was pulled back from 72 to 11 jabs?
English