Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Pat176
60.4K posts

Pat176
@Patrick17_6
_____ Well what do we type in here? _____ YouTube: https://t.co/wron4z1Mq4
Red Dead Redemption 2 Katılım Ocak 2017
106 Takip Edilen221 Takipçiler

Every dot in that image is a star. Each one probably has planets. Scientists just combed through every planet we’ve ever confirmed outside our solar system, all 6,150 of them, and asked a simple question: how many could actually support life?
45.
And that’s the generous count. A stricter version drops it to 24.
I spent a while sitting with that number because it sounds depressing until you realize how misleading it is. Our telescopes are basically designed to find the wrong planets. They’re really good at spotting massive gas balls hugging their stars, the kind of planets where nothing could ever live. Small, rocky worlds sitting at the right distance from their star (not too hot, not too cold, liquid water could exist on the surface) are almost invisible to current instruments. We’re finding them by accident more than by design.
So 45 is where the count starts, with instruments that can barely see what they’re looking for. NASA estimates the Milky Way alone has somewhere between 100 billion and 300 billion planets. We’ve cataloged 6,150. That’s like surveying one apartment in Manhattan and concluding the city has no good restaurants.
The red glow in the photo is probably the North America Nebula, about 2,600 light-years from us. That bright clump is called the Cygnus Wall, a 20-light-year-long wall of hydrogen gas where new stars are being born right now. Planets are probably forming around them as you read this.
A Cornell team published the 45-planet list on March 19. Two of those worlds are close enough for the James Webb Space Telescope to actually sniff their atmospheres: TRAPPIST-1e, roughly 40 light-years away, and TOI-715b. JWST has already stared at TRAPPIST-1e four separate times, looking for gases that shouldn’t exist together unless something alive is producing them (methane plus carbon dioxide is the combo, same thing cows and forests pump into our own atmosphere). Results so far are a mess. The star itself keeps throwing off flares that scramble the data. They’re trying again with a clever workaround, watching a dead, airless planet in the same system pass in front of the star at the same time, to subtract out the star’s noise.
The closest rocky planet in a livable zone is Proxima Centauri b, 4.2 light-years away. At the speed of the fastest thing we’ve ever launched, it would take about 73,000 years to get there.
I keep coming back to the math on this one. Two trillion galaxies in the observable universe. Hundreds of billions of planets per galaxy. And we’ve checked 6,150. We’re arguing about whether life exists out there based on a sample size that rounds to zero.
Curiosity@CuriosityonX
There has to be life on one of these dots.
English

men were never meant to see this many beautiful women, social media got us fried. Our ancestors used to only see 10 baddies in their whole life
fayesxh@fayesxh
ist das curvy??
English


@SpicyBerry Yes if you've been convinced otherwise, you may need to change the company you keep.
English


You know what this means? It means that the past, in a sense, still exists…if you’re in the right vantage point to observe it.
To understand why this is possible, you have to recognize that everything you see depends on light. Objects are visible because they emit or reflect light. If something neither emits nor reflects any light, you wouldn’t see it at all ,you’d only perceive darkness or, at best, a silhouette.
Now, the key point is that the speed of light is finite. Light travels at a specific speed…it doesn’t move instantaneously from one place to another.
If that’s the case, then everything you see is actually seen as it was in the past. The amount of delay depends on the distance between you and the object you’re observing.
When you look at your phone screen, you’re seeing it as it was a few microseconds ago….that’s how long it takes for the light to reach your eyes. When you look at the Sun, you’re seeing it as it was about 8 minutes ago, for the same reason.
Now take this idea further….if an alien civilization were located 2,000 light-years away and had a sufficiently powerful telescope focused on Earth…especially around Nazareth or Bethlehem…it would catch Mary and Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, planning on how to convince Joseph that the pregnancy was by the Holy Spirit…when in reality, she had a sexual encounter with a Roman soldier who later rejected responsibility for the pregnancy. 🥲
Curiosity@CuriosityonX
Did you know🚨: A civilization 2,000 light-years away looking at Earth today would see the Roman Empire.
English

@fw_naetoblaq Facts. As I've grown up I've realized this to be true.
English

Love alone isn’t enough for a relationship to work
Andyy@fw_andyyy
Unpopular relationships opinions that would get you in this position ????
English

I don’t think a woman can actually enjoy the very best that this life has to offer, as in, adventure and do risky and dangerous things without wrecking herself, unless she has a dangerous and trustworthy man to do it with.
The safety, thrill and complementarity of her lover’s presence just opens up the world to her in ways it is closed without him. He can take her to places that would be unsafe for her alone. Speak for her in places where they would not listen were the very exact same words coming from a woman's tongue. She is, in her natural state, less free without him - viewed by the world as prey with her small body, and as less serious with her feminine voice - and she knows it.
Paradoxically then, man both limits and frees her, and if he does it right - limits her by structuring her in all the ways that are most freeing - by bringing coherence to her self-destructive chaos, and generative chaos where she has otherwise been restricted, muzzled, and unable to indulge her appetites.
English















